Outfront Tonight, Grief And Anger not far from where George Floyd took his last breath. The community around minneapolis again gathering, this time for Daunte Wright, the 20yearold Black Man shot by a Police Officer. Officer Kim Potter yelled taser, taser, taser at wright before firing her gun. The Police Chief says she mistook her gun for her taser. At one point, Wrigts Mother was on the phone with her son. That, of course, would be the last time she ever spoke to him. And today, she spoke about him by his casket. I never imagined that i would be standing here, the roles should be reversed. My son should be burying me. My son had a smile that was worth A Million dollars. When he walked in the room, he lit up the room. He was a brother, a jokester. He was loved by so many. Hes going to be so missed. Wrights family was surrounded by other families, who also have lost Loved Ones at the hands of police. The families of George Floyd, or Lando Castillo and Jamal Clark were all there, along
these had application to the issue that were here before your honor today. the first has nothing to do nothing related to the disqualification of anyone. some of these are relating to aspiring for broad language of outstanding language to prosecutors. point taken. if there are more keep going. as it relates to one of the cases referenced here earlier, and is also referenced in some of the briefing by defense counsel is georgia 542 and all of the cases that fall under this, what i would call cat category, is about an attorney who formally prosecuted a defendant is the same type of case or similar charges. that is why the courts found the disqualification would be necessary because of the relationship that existed between the former client and the person being prosecuted now. the next series of slides goes through what has been addressed as it relates to the standard that is required when dealing with the issue of disqualification and the state would submit to the court
of the cases that defense counsel had cited within their brief that had absolutely no application to the issue that we re here before, your honor, today. the first mciver be state has nothing to do. has nothing related to the disqualification of anyone. i think some of these are just relating to kind of aspiring for broad language about standards to prosecutors. so point taken there but if they re more all right. keep it on so as it relates to one of the cases that was referenced here earlier. and as i was also referenced in some of the briefing by defense counsel, is the we re just savy state, which is to 87 georgia, 542. and i ll all of the cases that fall under this, what i would call category is about a attorney who formerly prosecuted a defendant in i guess the same type of case are the same case or similar charges. and that would be why of course, we re using the courts found that disqualification would be necessary because of the relations kinship that existed betw
two days after a drone attack by iran backed militants that killed three american troops injordan, president biden has said he has now decided how to respond. he didn t give more detail, but he did said america wasn t looking for a wider war in middle east. tensions have soared since the october 7th attacks by hamas in israel, with us forces in iraq and syria coming under attack more than 150 times. but what happened at tower 22 the military post injordan at the weekend was the first fatal attack. in the last few hours, the us president has been speaking. have you decided how to respond to the attacks? have you decided how to respond to the attacks? yes. inaudible i do hold them the attacks? yes inaudible i do hold them responsible in the attacks? 151v inaudible i do hold them responsible in the sense they are supplying the weapons. sense they are supplying the wea ons. ~ , i don t think we need a wider war in the middle east, that s not what i m looking for. preside
ruled that donald trump s role injan 6th riot at the us capitol meant he was ineligible to run for office again. the ruling referred to clause 3 of the 14th amendment of the us constitution that prohibits anyone who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding elected office. the supreme court has since taken up that case. and before them in support of colorado is a brief signed by twenty five historians, all of them experts on the civil war and reconstruction. in their submission they write, that, contemporary evidence from the decision makers who sponsored, backed, and voted for the 14th amendment, demonstrates that decision makers crafted section three to cover the president and to create an enduring check on insurrection, requiring no additional action from congress. there are diverging legal views on whether trump must actually be found guilty of the crime of insurrection before he can be deemed constitutionally ineligible, and whether congress needs to play a r