Formally recognized a palestinian state. Deadline white house starts right now. Hi there, everyone. 22 witnesses, 21 days of court, 80 hours of Witness Testimony later, the firstever criminal trail of an expresident is coming to a close. The prosecution has one last chance to hammer home its case in close answer on tuesday, given that the defense put up just two witnesses, lasting four times longer than their entire presentation, only the manhattan d. A. Is wrestling with the about the Testimony Bombshell after bombshell over four weeks. Jurors listens intendly, as they testified about the confidential arrangement made with trump in 2015. Hope hick telling the about the infame owls Access Hollywood tape. Jurors also saw the handwritten notes that worked out the monthly reimbursements. Stormy daniels was questioned in detail about an rattled Sexual Encounter . Michael cohen it was, mr. Trumps former fixer turned foe Michael Cohen taken the stand. So, all the testimony and all of the evi
released today, propaganda video that depicts new york city in some of the elements oof that video. obviously specifically intended to be interpreted as a threat here in new york city. the fbi statement on this video is, we are aware of the reporting of ongoing terrorist threats of new york city to include the newly released isis video involving times square. it reaffirms the message that new york city remains a terrorist target. while there s no specific articulatable threat at this time. what s your interpretation of this situation with the video and the fbi s response? the fbi and nypd said this is propaganda value mostly, trying to issue another threat to new york city, one of the most desirable targets for terrorist groups around the world, of course, incluing isis. and before that, al qaeda. but i think this footage has been recycled before.
let s take midare a. you authorized us to get the phones in california. missare a was talking to the other four teams. under the business record fisa, because we had stored that data in a database, we have what we call reasonable articulatable suspicion and we can do back in time and see who he talked to. if we saw four other groups, we wouldn t know who they are, we d only get the numbers and say this looks of interest and pass that to the fbi. we don t look at u.s. the identities of it. we only look at the connections. i m way over time. i m not going to dwell on it. you gave a clear illustration where you had specific information about telephone contacts which i don t quarrel with. i quarrel with collecting all of the information in california on telephone records to find that specific case. that to me seems overly broad.
i think i have the conservative position here. conservatives say they want less government entruck into our personal lives. anybody could be arrested and that doesn t mean the person is guilty and then you get the person s dna and then the government stores the dna and access to family history, health information, all kinds of personal information and that information could then be used against that suspect for perhaps a future crime without articulatable suspicion that somebody is guilty of anything without a warrant to do this as a fourth amendment violation. what about the fourth amendment? unlawful, unreasonable search and seizure. people say dna is the road map to the most personal information. why should the government be able to take it before you are convicted? you have to strike a balance. they put in unreasonable. i m a big fan of the bill of rights and the fourth amendment. this particular case out of maryland is a gentlemen named alonzo king, a rapist, a monster and the
new york city remains a terrorist target. while there s no specific arc c articulatable threat at this time. the fbi and nypd said this is propaganda value mostly, trying to issue another threat to new york city, one of the most desirable targets for terrorist groups around the world, of course, including isis. and before that, al qaeda. but i think this footage has been recycled before. it s been used in previous isis videos. and so it is not new, the threat is not new, but the video message is new, which is threaten france yet again in the same video saying this is not over. and it s not over, i guess, on a much wider scale. it s not over for france or other countries we view as enemy nations. all of us here in new york wake up knowing this is a target.