republican party is throwing out there. they wrap their message in, what s sounds like something that people would be interested in, when, in fact, it is anti-democratic. everything the talk about anti-education, anti-democratic, anti-health care, anti-everything, but they wrap it in this conundrum. the message is confusing. when you hear election integrity, it s also something, yes, we should get around that. but when you understand, what they mean by election integrity, and stripping voting rights from people, closing polling stations, disallowing absentee voting, things like that, that is not election integrity. that is just a way to suppress the vote, and that is how they think they can win. they can t win with the vote, so they try to limit the people who can vote. carol, thank you for joining us tonight. carol glenville, in the michigan elect, we appreciate your time. thank you. coming up next, the january six investigation, interviewing
how did that resonate? when you were talking to people, as you were campaigning, do people care about that stuff? the actual election integrity issue that has become so central to michigan politics? i think election integrity is another one of the misconceptions that the republican party is throwing out there. they wrap their message in, what s sounds like something that people would be interested in, when, in fact, it is anti-democratic. everything the talk about anti-education, anti-democratic, anti-health care, anti-everything, but they wrap it in this conundrum. the message is confusing. when you hear election integrity, it s also something, yes, we should get around that. but when you understand, what they mean by election integrity, and stripping voting rights from people, closing polling stations, disallowing absentee voting, things like that, that
elections in the entire state. how does that resonate? when you were talking to people as you were campaigning, do people care about that stuff, the actual election integrity issue that has become so central to michigan politics? i think election integrity is, it s another one of the kind of misconceptions that the republican party is trying to throw out there. they wrap their message in what sounds like something that people would be interested in, when in fact it is anti-democratic, right? everything they talk about is anti-education, anti-democratic, anti-health care, and anti-everything that they recognize as kind of a conundrum, the message is a little bit confusing for folks, so you hear election integrity, it sounds like we should get around it but when you understand election integrity and stripping voting rights from people and closing polling stations and disallowing
go going to be lasting for generations. the nomination is barely a day old and we are talking about the politics. we need to take a step back to look at his record. his record is anti-health care, and anti-roe v. wade and he thinks that trump should be above the law. this is the kind of the nominee that we felt that he would nominate because of the litmus test, test, and he said that they would do what he says, and this is what we have here. his record limiting a woman s right to abortion, and dissenting when it comes to the affordable health care act, and that is why we are seeing the democratic senators running out to say, this is who we thought that it would be and that is why we are opposed to it. the american people by a margin of two to one opposed the supreme court overturning roe v. wade, and they oppose president trump trying to take away health care for people with pre-existing health care through