On the difference between 12 miles of fisheries and 200 miles of fisheries, and i can understand the delicacies. I believe as the Prime Minister tries to help mr. Mccraw by phasing in those fishing rights. We will be speaking with our fisheries expert, therese raphael. And the underlying question, how many can fish at any time, we will see if they want to sign something or whether they want to postpone it. Thats get to first word news with ritika gupta. Ritika the Justice Department is in talks about resulting charges against the ceo of huawei technologies. It is a longrunning dispute that fueled a clash between the u. S. And china. Canada arrested mag ones out two years ago, confined to the city of vancouver ever since. There are talks of a third prosecution agreement on violating sanctions against iran. That would allow him to return to china. Call for says he will americans to wear masks for the first 100 days of his administration. He will issue a Standing Order biden sayses he thi
Through a number of judges. I am going to be a little bit limited in that. I have to give my presentation and not go through the questionandanswer, and i almost would have rather flipped that because the question. Question period is more important. I appreciate this opportunity to speak and i hope to continue the dialogue because the issue is the issue of our time. I will talk about u. S. China relations and maintaining the United States competitive edge. There is a widespread understanding that addressing a rising china is the great Foreign Policy challenge of our time, so this could not be a more important time or more important conversation. I believe we can and must retain our leadership and Global Competitive advantage by erasing those defining characteristics raising those defining characteristics that have made america the leader of the world. Rights, diversity, human , and ultimately the rights of an individual, especially when those rights come in conflict with the government.
Test the only the way that i come at that aspect is why are you using it for . Right. Because its like i said, youre not convincing anybody with that argument. Theres nobody who is against impeachment who can be turned to impeachment because the federal system. In fact, there is nobody, i believe, there is nobody against impeachment that can be turned towards impeachment because impeachment is no longer a legal or political issue. It is a social issue. Like donald trump is your team. He is on your white supremacist team and youre going to go with that or not. I dont know that tis argument while it is a good one, is effective at changing anybodys mind who hasnt already made their mind up about impeachment. Just to respond to your yes, i think i heard two questions. One is, do we win and the other one is, does he get removed . Im going to kind of separate those out and im going to reframe who we are. If im again, if i can speak from the ukrainian experience, be not only because of the cu
Topics panel on the appeasement of President Trump. Coleman, andancis i will be your moderator. We have a distinguish set of panelists who will discuss the impeachment of President Trump from a political and diplomatic perspective. We have a video presentation. I will begin with a short introduction of our panelists. Each will speak for 10 to 15 minutes after each has spoken, we will open it up so they can have reaction to each others presentation, and then we will open it up to questions from the audience. We have professor frank bowman, who is the Floyd R Gibson endowed professor of law at the university of missouri. He is also the author of a recent book, high crimes and misdemeanors a history of impeachment before mr. Trump. He is also the author of a blog, Impeachable Offenses. We have dr. Monica f injured. As an anthropologist of model, her extension of work on private property and ukraine is book,sis for her current property and oligarchy. She works in the u. S. , ukraine, and o
Extensive fieldwork on the creation of privacy and post soviet ukraine is the basis for her current work on property and al arche. Teaching and other jurisdictional, property theory, diplomacy, property law and the law of four. Working with ukraine on ukrainian issues for 25 years started before she became a legal scholar. During her time which included a two or of duty at the u. S. Embassy. He is the executive editor of above the law. A frequent commentator. We are looking forward to a very exciting panel with divergent views and takes on the impeachment process. Our first panelist will be from the professor. Constitutionally sufficient charges. Greetings to everyone in washington. I am frank. Circumstances are such that unfortunately i could not be with you in washington today. The organizers of this panel were kind enough to submit this short film in lieu of a personal appearance. Here are some thoughts on impeachment. Sometime in the next few weeks the effort to impeach and remove