resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5:00 p.m., january 23, 2018. the commission members had electronic members of draft e.i.r. and background reports, including historic resource evaluation and response. the commission secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. today we re here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e.i.r. i would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft e.i.r. with historical resources the project site is a 2-story building that housed the metropolitan community church of san francisco and is now vacant. the proposed project would demolish the building, split the lot into two and construct two four-story, 40-foot-tall residential buildings
draft e.i.r. pursuant to the california environmental quality act or ceqa and procedures for implementing ceqa. chapter 31 requires a planning department to schedule public hearing that the historic preservation commission may have on a draft e.i.r., and prepared for projects that contain a resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5:00 p.m., january 23, 2018. the commission members had electronic members of draft e.i.r. and background reports, including historic resource evaluation and response. the commission secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. today we re here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e.i.r. i would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft
implementing ceqa. chapter 31 requires a planning department to schedule public hearing that the historic preservation commission may have on a draft e.i.r., and prepared for projects that contain a resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5:00 p.m., january 23, 2018. the commission members had electronic members of draft e.i.r. and background reports, including historic resource evaluation and response. the commission secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. today we re here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e.i.r. i would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft e.i.r. with historical resources the project site is a 2-story building that housed the metr
resource determined on sub stfrjal evidence to be a resource the public review project began on december 6, 2017, and will continue until 5:00 p.m., january 23, 2018. the commission members had electronic members of draft e.i.r. and background reports, including historic resource evaluation and response. the commission secretary has also distributed a handout, which i will refer you to later. copies of this handout are available to members of the public on the table to my left. today we re here to provide the commission to provide public testimony, to discuss and formulate any comments that you wish to submit on the draft e.i.r. i would like to provide with you a brief summary of the draft e.i.r. with historical resources the project site is a 2-story building that housed the metropolitan community church of san francisco and is now vacant. the proposed project would demolish the building, split the lot into two and construct two four-story, 40-foot-tall residential buildings
producing devices please turn them off. in regards to public comment if you fill out a blue card we ll call those first and then open up to everyone on each item. how many minutes do you want? general public comment. because we have 15 minutes in the first period let s give 3 minutes and we ll look at other items. 3 minutes on general public comment and then he will- see how many people want to testify. during public comments the commission nor staff will respond to public comment while it is going on. commissioners may ask staff to respond when comment is closed. we go to ititem 2. this will be brief. many heard my say over the years 220 parks in san francisco that everybody has a opinion and rarey do two people agree. having said that the chamber of commerce in the survey of services ensan francisco reported that the san francisco recreation park department had the highest rating of approval in san francisco at 70 percent positive rating with only 14 percent voicing