Stay updated with breaking news from Amy hough. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Panto season: Book now for Jack and the Beanstalk at Grove Theatre in Dunstable with Eastenders star in cast lutontoday.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lutontoday.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Drug manufacturers reject Cleveland's insulin price-fixing claims ideastream.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ideastream.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The city says drugmakers and pharmacies 'orchestrated a pricing scheme that resulted in skyrocketing insulin prices and cost the city millions of dollars.' ....
Joining me now pete williams and amy hough. let s go back to the recess appointment decision. pete, what was interesting is there were two decisions. explain. well, the court said three things. number one, they said that you can have a recess appointment not only between sessions of congress, but within sessions of congress. secondly, you can appoint people who are when the vacancies arise before the recess. the constitution says the president can fill up vacancies that arise during the recess of the senate and what the supreme court said is that means vacancies that exist, not that occur. and thirdly they said a recess has to be at least ten days. so for all practical purposes, when the white house and the senate are in opposite parties, the recess appointment power is dead. completely dead because they ll do these they said specifically these fake sessions, which harry reid started back in 06 and 07 to prevent judge packing in his mind, something that the republicans want t ....
Amy, what was interesting here, though, there was sort of two different things the nine justices were saying. they decided to be unanimous on one part of the decision but then they disagreed on another part. explain that. exactly. they agreed that these particular recess appointments were unconstitutional. the particular ones the three appointments to the national labor relations board. but the nine justices split pretty sharply on exactly what the scope of the president s recess appointments power would be. so this was a really unusual occurrence in which you had justice scalia who agreed with the result still read from the bench for 20 minutes why he thought the theory of recess appointments was actually wrong. he and the three other justices, kennedy, thomas and alito would have read it even much more narrowly than the majority did. he would have basically thrown it out completely. yes. pete and i have been discussing this the last six ....