amy, what was interesting here, though, there was sort of two different things the nine justices were saying. they decided to be unanimous on one part of the decision but then they disagreed on another part. explain that. >> exactly. they agreed that these particular recess appointments were unconstitutional. >> the particular ones -- >> the three appointments to the national labor relations board. but the nine justices split pretty sharply on exactly what the scope of the president's recess appointments' power would be. so this was a really unusual occurrence in which you had justice scalia who agreed with the result still read from the bench for 20 minutes why he thought the theory of recess appointments was actually wrong. he and the three other justices, kennedy, thomas and alito would have read it even much more narrowly than the majority did. >> he would have basically thrown it out completely. >> yes. >> pete and i have been discussing this the last six