Anything else, this man was not necessarily that person. However, my point was just to say that you can be lowlevel george, you can be low on the org chart and still be the guy who goes to moscow and was sending plenty of emails to people who were high level. High level, theres now it seems like there may be a fair number of people, including high level steve, mr. Bannon, who is for the first time, this is the first moment in which highlevel steve is being dragged into this investigation. First time weve heard his name in a material way and that story may be developing. Let me jump in on this. The point is that when you want to do something sensitive like this, its something akin to an intelligence operation which was what this was on the russian side and i would argue in ways even on the trump side. You do send a lowlevel guy. You dont send the senior guy. You send the low level guy because he attracts less attention. You do that with purpose. So im very much validating johns point bu
Respected by their male colleagues and treated as equals. To certain bishops or cardinals theyre well aware of the problems many women in the Catholic Church are turning away because they dont feel theyre taken seriously. Women want to be more visible. This isnt in different parts of the world white church theres a growing sensitivity to that desire and its also reaching the vatican only. Becoming more visible is part of the challenge anybody sees what goes on behind the walls of the vatican. Bought a quarter of the staff are women many more lay women the nuns and many of them highly qualified. Editor in chief of the french section of Vatican Radio for twenty five years looking back she remembers how difficult it was
at the beginning how some cardinals thought it beneath dignity to be interviewed by a woman and simply ignored her. Also said. As soon as i left the studios to interview somebody at the vatican it was dreadful when i was in a larger group of men i always had the feeling th
A look at the days news and headlines. A look at the days news and headlines. Dont want to put him in a position where he might injury himself, perjure himself or blow up the investigation and thats where Rudy Giuliani is. A possible circumstance for a sitdown. He has been clear when he said listen, the president could decide to do this but im not so sure they will actually let him do that. Well be watching as it all unfolds. Sandra more on that coming up. Kevin corke at the white house. Bill the trump team announcing a new round of sanctions against russia to hold russia responsible from a nerve attack that may have caused the death of a british woman and trying to kill a former spy. This move has to please the u. K. And some others in europe, i believe. Absolutely. Theresa may had been urging the Trump Administration to take tough action against russia after this poisoning, yution of
a Chemical Agent on british soil. This has to be seen in a much larger context, which is President Tr
political operatives who want to get to these people it has to be incredibly concerning for anyone in that potential juror pool when i saw this come through this morning, i said i totally get it anyone who s been in any way in the trump orbit, john, his ire knows what that means for you, for your family were professionals. many of us are used to this, but to a lay person, someone who is an oncology nurse focused on on that work to have this in the back of your mind concern not only for yourself before your family, i 100% understand why this is a concern. now, prior to all this happening and talking to sources on both sides, there was a concern, not just the safety aspect, but if they wouldn t be able to find 12 jurors and six alternates. and how long that would take. and what we ve seen over the past as 24 hours. you see just how difficult this is even when you think you have a juror seated, you have a lot of additional layers here that you don t have another cases. so i m sorry, i w
it seems unlikely that they would say yes, we are going to hear it. but judge chutkan wants to move forward. then it would be on them, then the timeframe goes on them. exactly. now, they could do this month long process the way they did the colorado case. not, just remember, judge chutkan has still kept the march 4th trial date. if the supreme court takes it, that trial date is off. in the manhattan district attorney s office is going to go forward at the end of march, because that is the date that they have. there s no reason for them to delay it, they will be free to go forward. if the supreme court doesn t take it, then there s a really good chance that what is going to happen is, maybe not march 4th, but around then. maybe a couple more weeks. you think the arguments were so again, i m a lay person here, i found the impeachment think so they just seem so trapped in that argument. it seems manifestly preposterous. it just doesn t work with anything. there s no reason for