Vice president on not he will take to the podium in grand rapids, michigan, and what marks his third visit to the Battle Ground state in a month. We are told he will be centering his speech around the economy and inflation, as it remains a top issue in the state. Sandra also take aim at the administrations energy policy, plans of a multibillion dollar ev battery plants. So far Vice President harris has been vague on her energy policies, so what could we expect . We will get the read from fox business Charles Payne live just ahead. Really an extraordinary abuse of power by both the fbi, the cia on covid and other issues by department of homeland security, so i think we are still at the beginning of a reckoning here of really a panic that resulted from peoples ability to get information. We see people having a kind of panic around the inability to control information thanks to the internet and social media platforms. The fact that you have government putting its thumb on the scale and in
chris hayes starts now. tonight on all in. the presidents actions and words on january 6th were reckless. the special counsel wants to get mike pence under oath. i would hope that they would not bring charges against the former president. tonight, what we know about the subpoena for the vice president and what it means for the january 6th investigation. then i read your opening statement isn t actually an excerpt from your book. is that right? well, it covers some of the same territory, yes. next time make sure you give us a heads up and we can set up a table for you to have a book signing after this. from witnesses pushing books to cable pundits pretending to be twitter experts have you ever work for twitter? now. you have any formal relationship with the company? now. i just have an account. a surreal scene in today s first mega hearing on weaponization. if weaponization of the department justice has any meaning this is yet. all in starts
former president. tonight, what we know about the subpoena for the vice president and what it means for the january 6th investigation. then i read your opening statement is actually an excerpt from your book. is that right? well, it covers some of the same territory, yes. next time make sure you give us a heads up and we can set up a table for you to have a book signing after this. from witnesses pushing books to cable pundits pretending to be twitter experts have you ever worked for twitter? no. do you have any formal relationship with the company? no. i just have an account. a surreal scene in today s first maga hearing on weaponization. if weaponization of the department of justice has any meaning, this is it. all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. big news tonight. the grand jury investigation into the january 6th insurrection has crossed a remarkable threshold. former trump vice president mike pence has been subp
joining us now. so what more could you tell us. reporter: well this story is fast moving. it is only 72 hours since we first learned there was a problem at the secret service where text messages from january 5th and 6th on agents phones were erased or lost because of a data migration tech process that that agency had ongoing around the 6th, this pivotal event. but here is the story of how this played out over the last couple of days. so the department of homeland security inspector general, a watch dog that would look into the secret service related to january 6 was frustrated about not getting information from them in this investigation. and that included the i.g. learning there were erased text messages. this i.g. at dhs notified capitol hill three days ago this was a problem, that is how the public and the news organizations covering the story first learned about it and then the inspector general went and briefed all nine members of the house select committee yesterday.
of the alleged proposed changes were workable, but some went beyond what the group had previously agreed to in talks for a ceasefire. speaking in qatar wednesday, secretary blinken reiterated that hamas was the party holding back an agreement. a deal was on the table that was virtually identical to the proposal that hamas put forward on may 6th. a deal that the entire world was behind, a deal israel has accepted, and hamas could have answered with a single word, yesi. instead, hamas waited nearly two weeks, and then proposed more changes, a number of which go beyond positions it had previously taken and accepted. the senior hamas official mentioned earlier responded to secretary blinken. osama hamdan told the bbc that mr blinken is part of the problem, not the solution. he said hamas designated a terrorist organization by the us maintains its demands for a permanent ceasefire and a complete withdrawal of israeli forces from gaza. that s a slight variation from the three pha