some deals with movies. jordan: in the 80s, some serial killers were treated like celebrities, and the media outlets would actually compete to get the rights to their stories. ramirez was in that group. linedecker: he did what a lot of people like him do. he suddenly decided that, gee, i m a celebrity, and i m going to milk this for everything i can milk it for. yochelson: there was some indication that there was a book deal in the works, which poses all kinds of ethical issues, so the judge actually appointed another lawyer just to advise ramirez as to the possible issues of financing his defense through a book deal, and ramirez refused to talk to that lawyer. ultimately, daniel and arturo hernandez came on the case. they re not related, even though they have the same last name. the family has retained us officially, and as far as we re concerned, we are the attorneys for mr. ramirez. hernandez: we ended up with the case, and it made a big difference, absolutely,
reports that the plan, for now, is for the manhattan district attorney s office to present the case to a grand jury, and that s how they will decide if any charges will be made. according to two sources familiar with the matter, the timing of this is unclear, as the investigation is ongoing. meanwhile, penny has hired manhattan d.a. bragg s republican challenger, thomas kenneth, who ran against each other two years ago. the incident is drawing comparisons to two familiar cases that they re trying to use. one is the bodega owner who stabbed an assailant in self-defense last year and had a murder case against him dropped. and the other case of bernard gets, one i was involved in in the 80s, who shot for young black man on the subway and was eventually acquitted of all, but one, gun charge. he claimed self-defense and then i can t help but also bring another case out that was involved in lately, erik gardner case, the chokehold
the autumn statement, that we have prioritised the nhs and we have listened and put more funding in. how the funding is split up and how much is for pay versus having more nurses and how much should be going on more diagnostic equipment, these are the conversations we are making with the nhs and that is why we have an independent process on pay, rightly, and it was called for in the 80s by the rcn, to have a independent review pay process and we have respected those decisions. they make recommendation to the government, often higher than what the government initially suggested, and higher than what many people in the private sector are receiving, but we have accepted them in full because that is the right thing and as i said to others, we are happy to have a dialogue and the door is always open. we are talking about the process for next year which is what we should be sitting down and talking through and it is notjust about pay, when you are talking to anne boleyn is workers and others
actually became an issue because the national archives, as they do, for the public record is, they go through all of the documents from a presidency, put it all together, make sure it is very clearly organized, and during that process, which takes decades, there are still at times these archivists are going back to former presidencies, that, you know, in the 70s, in the 80s, when they find new historic records that need to be preserved correctly. but what they realized when they were going through the trump white house s records was that there were documents that were missing that were publicly known and fairly infamous, and gained notoriety throughout the course of the trump presidency, including for example that letter from kim jong-un, the north korean dictator that famously wrote former president trump a letter while he was in office, it was missing from the
0 2022 and they are going to google at the thought of what your life must be like. they will goggle at the thought of what it must be like to see something like this happening in your lifetime in realtime for the first time ever in american history, having no idea how it would how it would play out. nothing like this has ever happened before. and we don t know how it ends. tonight s news, that the fbi has raided the home of the immediate past-president of the united states, it feels both astonishing and sort of inevitable in equal measure. before republican president donald trump, we never before had a president impeached twice in a single term. we ve never had so many members of a president s own party vote not only to impeach him but to convict him and remove him from office and bar him from ever serving in office again. we have never before had a president reject the results of the election that did remove him from office, we never before had a president summon his followers into a