$500. for that same low, low price, you also get a metaphor for republican governance by this ill conceived stunt. that does it for us tonight. you can catch me back here on tomorrow night at eight pm eastern. now, it s time for the last word with jonathan capehart who is in lawrence. h jo good evening, jonathan. good evening, a man. it s our first time doing a hand up. i know in your last, you re talking about the supreme court. we re gonna pick it up right here at 10:00. i m sure you will, my friend. have a good hour. thanks, eamonn. and on the last day of pride 2023, the republican appointed justices on the supreme court in shrine discrimination against lgbtq people in a case deliberately brought to advance conservative interests in a favorable court. of course, it was about a wedding website. it was decided that in the evangelical website design or in colorado would not have to design the website for same-sex couple because it would violate her first amendment righ
our first time doing a hand off. i know in your last segment, you re talking about the supreme court. we re gonna pick it up right here at 10:00. i m sure you will, my friend. have a good hour. thanks, ayman. and on the last day of pride 2023, the republican appointed justices on the supreme court in shrine discrimination against lgbtq people in a case deliberately brought to advance conservative interests in a favorable court. of course, it was about a wedding website. it was decided that in the evangelical website design or in colorado would not have to design the website for same-sex couple because it would violate her first amendment right by forcing her to say something she didn t believe. here is the thing, no gay couple actually asked for this evangelical website designers work. the conservative legal interest groups created out of cloth this fever dream that an evangelical wedding website design or what have her rights hypothetically challenged if a hypothetical s
wedding pikas she doesn t believe in their constitutional right to marry. now, it is hard to imagine exactly which part of the wedding website would be so violating. is it having to type the words adam and steve, summer 2023? directions to the venue, chicken, beef, vegetarian? what exactly is the profession that was so violate her, quote unquote, some severely held beliefs about marriage? it seems unlikely that any actual in gauge gay couple would seek out this person services for a custom creation for their love story. it is more concerning what legal floodgates have been opened by a supreme court conservative supermajority. justice sonia sotomayor argued in her dissent, today is a set date american constitutional law and in the lies of lgbt people. the supreme court of the united states declares that a particular kind of business, the open to the public, has a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. the court does so for the first time in its history. by
evangelical website design or in colorado would not have to design the website for same-sex couple because it would violate her first amendment right by forcing her to say something she didn t believe. here is the thing, no gay couple actually asked for this evangelical website designers work. the conservative legal interest groups created out of cloth this fever dream that an evangelical wedding website design or what have her rights hypothetically challenged if a hypothetical same-sex couple hypothetically asked for her to design a website for their wedding pikas she doesn t believe in their constitutional right to marry. now, it is hard to imagine exactly which part of the wedding website would be so violating. is it having to type the words adam and steve, summer 2023? directions to the venue, chicken, beef, vegetarian? what exactly is the profession