he said sort of cryptic things, migration is too high, yes, i think 700,000 were there it s too big, but today, for the first time in this campaign, he s been clear about a commitment to get the numbers down, which that is a different thing to saying i think it s too high, why? should the next general election be around that time, people like you and me will say you made a commitment in the last general election, how have you delivered against it? i also think it s significant because of the politics of it and the politics of it are pretty obvious and we should bill it out anyway. this is keir starmer, yet again, as he has every day since, though, it was a bit different at the start, he is trying to basically bash voters over the head with a message that he is moving the labour party way to the right of where it was in 2019 and 2017 general elections when their approach to immigration would ve been quite different to this. that is the message here. we can see this is the mess
it is laura in the studio. and it is henry in the studio. henry in the studio. today s big sto is henry in the studio. today s big story is keir henry in the studio. today s big story is keir starmer s - henry in the studio. today s big story is keir starmer s promise | henry in the studio. today s big i story is keir starmer s promise on migration. he has said cryptic things for a long time since he has been leader, yes, migration is too high, 700,000 people coming to the country is too big a number. but today for the first time in this campaign he has been clear about a commitment to get the numbers down, which, henry, is a different thing to say i think it is too high. why? because in five weeks per match time should he become prime minister, people like you and me also you made a commitment in the last general election, how have you delivered against it? i also think it is significant because of the politics. the politics are obvious, but we shall spell it out anyway. t
higher nearest pharmacy and there is a much higher concentration of pharmacies in deprived areas, which means that we will in deprived areas, which means that we will be in deprived areas, which means that we will be able to for these basic conditions we will be able to for these basic conditions be able to secure faster access conditions be able to secure faster access to conditions be able to secure faster access to health care. but conditions be able to secure faster access to health care. access to health care. but services have disappeared. access to health care. but services have disappeared. if access to health care. but services have disappeared. if i access to health care. but services have disappeared. if i may - access to health care. but services have disappeared. if i may on - access to health care. but services have disappeared. if i may on the | access to health care. but services i have disappeared. if i may on the gp oint, we have disappeared. if i may o
at pharmacies, the funding for those services has gone down one third since 2015 and more than 1000 of them have shut. so in both of these cases, it might be all very well you promising that now, but it will sound like a lot of people that you are trying to unpick the mistakes the tories have already made. 1with the tories have already made. with pharmacies the tories have already made. with pharmacies we the tories have already made. ti pharmacies we know that four out the tories have already made. if u pharmacies we know that four out of five people are within a 20 minute walk of their nearest pharmacy and importantly there is a much higher concentration of pharmacies in deprived areas which means that for the basic conditions we will be able to secure a faster access to health care. h, to secure a faster access to health care. p, , t , t, care. the point here, services have disappeared- care. the point here, services have disappeared- if care. the point here, services have d