Stay updated with breaking news from 24th amendment. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the capitol police, d.c. metropolitan police, other law enforcement agencies were attacked and assaulted before our very eyes, spirit, sprained, stomped on, brutalized and lives were lost. for three hours, the defeated former president of the united states watched it all happen. he sat in the comfort of a private diner next to the office. while he was doing that, brave law enforcement officer subject to for three hours. they were dripping in blood and surrounded by carnage. face-to-face to believe the lives of the defeated president. the police were there that day. donald trump lacked the courage to act. the brave women and men in blue all across this nation should never forget that. you can t be pro-insurrection and pro-cop. you can t be pro-democracy. you can t be pro-insurrection and pro-american. president biden doesn t talk about january 6 often nor does he talk about his predecessor often. we ve heard him use the phrase defeated former president, but he used don ....
for staying up with me. if you if you were brave enough to open the new york times this morning and you turned to the opinion section, this is what you would ve seen. thomas friedman, joe biden is a good man and a good president, he must bow out of the race. ■ç frank bruni, biden cannot go on like this. nicholas kristof, president biden, i ve seen enough. this evening, the entire editorial board of the new york times published this op-ed, to serve his country, president biden should leave the race. mr. biden answered urgent question on thursday night, it was not the answer he and his supporters were hoping for. if the risk of a second from term is as great as he says it is, his dedication leaves him and his party only one choice, the clearest path for democrats to defeat a candidate defined by his life is to deal truthfully with the american public. acknowledge that mr. biden cannot continue his race and try to process to select someone more capable to stand in h ....
President was reluctant to give a speech? yeah. what do you base that on? the fact that somebody had to tell me to nudge it along. let s remember that donald trump didn t want to give that speech. he only was pushed into it, because of the growing chatter that the 24th amendment might be invoked to remove him from office and prevent him from running again. even when he did, he watered it down. he crossed out stuff that was most important in terms of sending a signal to the country that he was not behind the insurrection. it turns out he was and he was happy about it. it turns out he was gleeful about what was going on. the most important thing about that speech, which hasn t been talked about very much, is that the people around him were willing to lie in this cover-up on january 7. there is language ....
The country, if some can t vote because of race, this is not a true democracy. preach, congressman. that s supposed to be the promise of america. true democracy means every one has equal rights and equal vote. voice and vote. until a right to vote doesn t depend on where you live or the color of your skin, we won t be living in a true democracy. and that is exactly why all americans need to care about this. all americans. the right to vote is right there in the constitution. the 15th amendment. extends the right to vote to any male regardless of race. the 19th amendment extends that right to women. the 24th amendment abolishes poll taxes intended to keep black people from voting. those amendments didn t just appear out of thin air. they were fought for with lives, protests and with acts of civil disobedience. if voting rights seem straightforward, it s because it is straightforward. but republicans are making it ....
that is still the policy of the department of justice. have you spoken to deputy attorney general rosenstein about his statements on invoking the 24th amendment admired up president trump? i have seen the statements by deputy rosenstein that he made to the press regarding both statements, and i have no reason to believe that he did not that those statements were consistent with what he believed at the time. i m not sure i understand that. you said you have no reason to believe they were not consistent. a couple negatives there. do you think they were consistent what he believed at the time customer i do i think what he said to the press, what it was first reported about his you re talking about his comments, his comments to the press, not the ones about him wearing a wire? i m talking about deputy attorney general rosenstein s comments to the press after it was reported that he had considered his responses. his responses, we think are ....