comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - நுகர்வோர் சட்டப்பூர்வமானது வைத்தியம் நாடகம் - Page 2 : comparemela.com

Of Tuna Price-Fixing Conspiracies, Econometric Regressions, And The Ninth Circuit s Latest Guidance On Class Certification - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision vacating a district court order certifying three plaintiff classes pursuing damages for alleged price-fixing conspiracies in the tuna industry. Olean Wholesale Grocery Coop., Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Case No. 19-56514, F.3d , 2021 WL 1257845 (9th Cir. Apr. 6, 2021). Although the decision addresses issues regarding antitrust injury and the use of econometric models to prove antitrust impact, its reach goes beyond the antitrust context to class litigation generally in the Ninth Circuit.

Of Tuna Price-Fixing Conspiracies, Econometric Regressions, and the Ninth Circuit s Latest Guidance on Class Certification | Foley & Lardner LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision vacating a district court order certifying three plaintiff classes pursuing damages for alleged price-fixing conspiracies in the tuna industry. Olean Wholesale Grocery Coop., Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Case No. 19-56514, F.3d , 2021 WL 1257845 (9th Cir. Apr. 6, 2021). Although the decision addresses issues regarding antitrust injury and the use of econometric models to prove antitrust impact, its reach goes beyond the antitrust context to class litigation generally in the Ninth Circuit.

Ninth Circuit Upholds Arbitration Agreement, Holding That its Ban on Class Actions Did Not Prohibit Plaintiff from Seeking Public Injunctive Relief Under California Law | King & Spalding

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On February 19, 2021, the Ninth Circuit upheld a district court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration in a putative class action lawsuit alleging violations of various California consumer protection statutes. The court rejected the Plaintiff’s argument that the Agreement was invalid under California law because its class action waiver prohibited her from seeking injunctive relief. Defendant MoneyLion provides financial services to its customers, one of which is the “MoneyLion Plus program.” That program offers customers with little or poor credit history a small “credit-builder” loan to help create a positive credit history. Plaintiff Marggieh DiCarlo enrolled in the Plus program and took out a credit-builder loan. As part of her enrollment, she signed a Membership Agreement (the “Agreement”) that required her to pay monthly fees and gave each party the right to demand arbitration in the event of a dis

AD-ttorneys@law – March 2021 #3 | BakerHostetler

DraftKings Settles Class Action Lawsuit for $8 Million Settlement is a hybrid payment whose lion’s share is in-game currency Two Fair Households It wasn’t too long ago that DraftKings and FanDuel, the biggest names in the fantasy sports league business, were set to merge. But the downfall of the deal is implied in the description of the companies – they were the biggest players in the field, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) didn’t want them to get together. But in a certain sense, the two companies got married anyway: They both experienced the same, or similar, legal woes brought on by their elevated position on the fantasy sports heap.

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.