In a recent opinion out of the Southern District of New York, Judge William H. Pauley III certified three classes of plaintiffs in New York, California, and Florida who allege that KIND.
In a recent opinion, three classes of plaintiffs were certified who allege that KIND LLC, the manufacturer of KIND Bars, deceptively marketed several products as all-natural and non-GMO, even though they contain synthetic and genetically modified ingredients.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit issued a decision vacating a district court order
certifying three plaintiff classes pursuing damages for alleged
price-fixing conspiracies in the tuna industry.
Olean Wholesale
Grocery Coop., Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Case No.
19-56514, F.3d , 2021 WL 1257845 (9th Cir. Apr. 6, 2021).
Although the decision addresses issues regarding antitrust injury
and the use of econometric models to prove antitrust impact, its
reach goes beyond the antitrust context to class litigation
generally in the Ninth Circuit.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision vacating a district court order certifying three plaintiff classes pursuing damages for alleged price-fixing conspiracies in the tuna industry.
Olean Wholesale Grocery Coop., Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Case No. 19-56514, F.3d , 2021 WL 1257845 (9th Cir. Apr. 6, 2021). Although the decision addresses issues regarding antitrust injury and the use of econometric models to prove antitrust impact, its reach goes beyond the antitrust context to class litigation generally in the Ninth Circuit.