Lands fiscal year budget is making a statement that the board thinks if you look at the renderings the project budget is going to this house is humongous and remain at 1. 899. I think all thats what i look at just the of the public discussion on the render to tell you the story you previous item is an accurate reflection of the boards understanding of our budget took the top floor off the situation and of course i defer duncan street august of last to the board and what you would like to do, but i would year you took the whole top recommend adopting the fiscal year budget. You think theres no other floor off i watched the video so way to do it but go on the i want to remind you of duncan record for adopting this as the next years budget based on the august 2014 there was a monster 1. 899 number . You can continue to do one house proposed similar to this month interim budgets which are you took the top floor off i was based on last years interim budget or you can adopt a impressed as you can see today they have no support for anybody budget for the entire fiscal year. Its the boards i talked to and discretion to choose. It doesnt look like anyone thank you dr requester. Else is bothered by the discrepancy but at least were on the record that it is a discrepancy. I think thats important because i dont want it to look later on like the im not sure exactly what board was not being cognizant of the changes we have had. I think the process is once we have a real budget with theyre proposing but it the these negotiations then we would make the amendments that are needed. Thats right. Discretionary review submittal in november, if we get a im made modifications to the Program Budget in november, then this would automatically lines and this risks the change, right . We would take a look at Foundation Failure and eliminate what the updated cash flow for the remainder of the fiscal the code violation for light year was and if there were categories that needed to be increased we could go ahead and actual light into my living room do that at that time. Typically we would have done this is what i propose for the budget amendments throughout first floor if you look at the the year as the need arose but we certainly could prepare it in november. Well, all right. Is there area bottom the building a grade a motion for approval . A 3 foot setback and a notch on motion. Motion and a second. Roll call. The office the floor above that first and second and no members of the public waiting to address you on that item, key, aye. Director riskin, 3 foot setback and a notch out of master Bedroom Terrace and at aye. Nuru, aye. Five eyes and the top floor another 3 foot the budget is approved. Setback authorizing web and it indicates that there will extend all the way across a 3 core obayashi joint venture to execute a trade work foot setback in a terrace below. Subcontract with concrete north as the responsible bidder those are the only changes i submitting the lowest indicated that will make the responsive thereby increasing impacts on 74a harper street authorized direct costs. Mark will report on this item. Reduce the reduction reduce the this trade package is eliminate the code violation for concrete toping slabs, concrete light and ventilation to the on the bus deck and seismic living room and minimize the joints for the transit center. Risk for Foundation Failure thank you. Thank you. With that, the public sorry pretty basic work. This is one of the most critical packages two imaginations for project at this point and thats why were coming to be awarded at sponsor. Thanks just quickly the issues this is this time and well be using some of the contingencies in the reserves to award it what you say tonight and if we because we dont have enough budget in the trade packages to award it. So we received a may 7th, we had 7 qualified can so the one of the concrete suggestions in the dr request bidders, we received 3 bidders ranging to 32 Million Dollars, so this is the second floor you all s were significantly above our budget and the gngc saw that as well the 3 feet estimate. We did share with the board some of the reasons setback lightwell we are behind that at the july board providing and providing a meeting. We did ask the setback right here cutting a contractor to extend their to chunk out of may or may not end of september. Their bid bedroom to the extent we received any actual suggestions from the dr request we did our best to accommodate those within the perimeters i am want to run expires 30 days after bid opening. It came in at 30 introduce a few things in terms Million Dollars and uron came of the setback under the memorandum i believe that what in at 32 Million Dollars. Even though they are above our that is talking about for a budget, they are come ted different Zoning District for rh1 d if so in the Zoning District were in rh1471 duncan competitive and within 10 percent of each other. As we shared with you at the had a party room we have a july Board Meeting, the difference between the estimate kitchen and it is the living our budget and the bids was attributed to some of the scope space like comparing apples and in the trade packages and not oranges and i also think that you can see from the project weve done accounted for, the estimate and a lot to address light and air Market Conditions and logistics. What i think you may be hearing so were recommending that when you hear privacy and when someone across the street is pub this package be awarded to u talking about loiltd someone concrete north for 27,677,000, maybe losing their view this project is designed to provide we believe the s are alignment to the properties that competitive and this is a are effected by a new houses and schedule critical package. Recommendation is to award it the property is designed to e by utilizing 11 Million Dollars from the budget for the multiply others verify. Remaining trade packages, the budget for the remaining trade with that, the public hearing portions is closed. Packages is 11. 6 million commissioner richards. Dollars, utilizing 6 million so can i ask a procedural dollars of program reserves which are currently 8. 45 question two Building Permits or Million Dollars and utilizing one permit. Staff please. The current construction there are two briment a contingency which is 34 Million Dollars. After the award the demolition permit and i want to remaining balances would be talk about the Building Permit 614,000 in the funded budget first ill be honest with you, we have for the remaining trade packages, 1. 5 Million Dollars a 2015 appraisal by the dr in the program reserves and requester against 2014 standard 23. 3 Million Dollars for the that is worse construction contingency. You know you, you are have an any questions . Do we know why four of the inflated market under the 7 rr prequalified bidders did numbers on the demolition not snit a . Department my thought your permit appraisal for 2014 we sat here last week and did a water permit for Howard Street luxury submit a bid condos 2,000 per foot your let plea ask steve appraisal is 2,000 per square feet i cant support demolishing humphries. Yeah, im not sure i can this house it didnt reach the tell you right at the moment exactly why they did not bid criteria and when i tell you when see this ill see the board the project. They were all engaged earlier and the four of supervisors and try to change 317 im going to make a motion bidders during the bid phrase we were aware well prior to bi to deny the demolition permit. Dday that they were not going second. To be bidding the project for a commissioner antonini. Well, i disagree i looked at variety of reasons. We do both the appraisals the extensive outreach efforts to appraisal that was done last keep the bidders engaged but it year was done by a certified is not unusual to have several public appraisal by the first bidders drop out before the Republic Bank banks are phase. I dont recall the conservative that is supplying what their lend their money exact reasons why they did drop. Based on the appraisal i had one this issue has come up several times so i think you done on my house it was can expect to be asked why if conservative memo son bought a not all bidders submitted a house done the street and i know bid, so im curious as to why the value on my place was much we dont have the answer to that at this Board Meeting. It more conservative it is one. 704 comes up every single time, we have asked every single time we have the rfp process reviewed how we can have as many of our and everything acknowledges the prices have religion even though qualified bidders so we get the the lower barrier it is far best price. I feel like were a broken record on this issue above the barrier and thats and we should be able to reach out when people arent bidding staffs position and my guess, of during the rfp process and find course, im voting against the out exactly what those reasons measure to not allow the are. I think we have records for demolition it is a wide lot 40 the reasons. I know theres feet widest youre paying for communication between web core, the size of the lot you can we just dont have them with us build a house of this size with right now, supervisor kim. I think we will have the details with us. Notifications ill agree to but i think we should always have that information at these make an inappropriate house and meetings. One of the things that i big enough with 4 bedrooms on the upper floor it make sense a notice over and over again, we master and bedrooms for the see these overs are the other three children and youve got factors included for them to be the appropriated bathrooms and things and thats on the middle higher, a large project consumes much of the bidders floor and then youve got the capacity and limiting its living room and dining room and the other spaces on the upper opportunity, inefficiencies and low productivity rates and perceived increased risk of floor and down below a garage large public works projects. The Square Footage is sometimes this is a large project. I a little bit overstayed i agree think we can start getting our with 45 hundred it maybe less estimators to realize its a than that in accident old days large project. And the same with you talked about square thing about the risk, its a footage you dont count public project. That really shouldnt be, thats really not bathrooms or hallways and did a reason to say thats why they that and garages so people who its something that was known to us long before it was are representing the square known to the bidder, its large and its public. Footage on the orderly homes im the question i have on the used to the lower figures that is the case being wrought up on other one, inefficiency and low this one this is in terms of the productivity rates assumed by bidder, does that have something to do with our job demolition situation when i will go with the prevail that is site or is that something that is just generic to. Submitted and acceptedcy first its lay down area, its Republic Bank secondly, theyve logistics. Theres no place for where were at is the done the stairs theyre gone and middle of downtown, theres no place to them for lay down the southeast corner is gone, area, theres no place to be able to work. Its not like theyve now cargo to what ive any other project where you have a lot of work, you can been told 16 plus square feet park your trucks, you can bring in your concrete pumps anywhere from the wall i dont any they you want to. So that difficulty was not accurately accounted for in our estimates. Have a 3 foot separation from that would make. I understand the part that mr. Harassing tons house im we have 7 bidders, we did not expect to get 7 s but we should invited my house is 3 feet from have gotten more than three the Property Line and the next bids but the fact we got three it is 3 feet from the Property Line and a detached neighborhood bids and they are close to each the setbacks are 3 feet from the other, for what its worth even line on each house that is more though our budget is off and the estimate is off. If these than accurate, however, ill propose a couple of things to bids were far off but they were help to needs needed the close to each other. Within 10 concerns the neighborhood i know percent, thats a good result. There is plenty of room to drop granted way above estimate. I two or three feet as used think we came up, rebidding excavates the present feet is 36 them is not going to give us better results and the scope is feet 10 inches in height what pretty simple. Any further discussion . Give me the height sir, if you member s of the public . Could are sorry 34. No. Yes, mr. Patrick. 34 now okay. So if we sorry, i made this comment knockoff two or three two to three feet come down to 31 or 31 before but this goes back to the joint labor agreement. I believe there are lots of to the place where some of the companies that dont pay the doctor have asked for not they highest labor rate by a matter of good policy. Our wages, our necessarily need it the loiltd company, we dont always pay with the changes youve made and the highest wages. Therefore the views and the separation we wouldnt be eligible to on from the proposals o property this because i dont want to that adequate that there make pay the highest wages. This board has made a policy that the house appear to follow the they will pay always the slope completely even more so i highest wages regardless of who they hire on this joint labor did came back easily done the agreement. Therefore we should not be surprised at the results. Other things if youll look at thank you. Our plans plan a. 21 and a. 22 thats it. Is there a motion to approve on the award . All and a. 3 those are the 3 floors youve got to bottom that an office space that be will be right. Okay, ed, our movers and seconders of the day. Incorporated for the recreation first and second, director room or made a little bit smaller i suggest taking two kim, aye. Director lee, yes. Feet off the south aspect of that and 2 feet off the i guess director riskin, aye. Vice chair nuru, aye. Harper aye, the east aspect where the thats five ayes. Smaller pop outs still remains 16 is authorizing the according what will happen you have a terrace youll have a executive director to execute terrace that is a little bit amendment 3 to the professional smaller it will have 2 feet on Services Agreement with turner the lessen the south and east it Construction Company to provide Construction ManagementOversight Services by will be a nice sized terrace and increasing the maximum computation from 45,980,000 to on the top floor the setback a complete there but have to 2 57,180,000. I am here to report on feet on the area that comes off the living room minor changes that creates more operation for amendment 3, which is funded the neighborhood on that area through the soft cost savings they should be absolutely in through other portions of the program. The cmo contract questions with those things scope has 11 specific items to being done im neutrality on the deck on the top having a it. It addressed that. They trapdoor youve done it the cover anywhere from any quality rights way hover from the items to inspection, source commissioners see fit to inspections testing to eliminate the upper deck it has technical support, source quite a few of the terraces on inspections are covered by isi the different leveled that serve mostly where we reference them the same purpose as the top deck and technical touch on waterproofing experts as we it is okay with me to get rid of move forward. Background on the contract itself, the contract was that those are the main awarded in june, 2010, had a 6 suggestions i have to make a year term and it started and good project even better and you goes through june of next year know im not one of those people so we still have over, almost a that says just because my his or year left with it. The her how is it small you have to original contract amount was it is appropriate for the lot 38. 5 million and as part of the and has to have minimum impacts budget, july 2013 budget, had on the neighbors which it will 35. 8 Million Dollars and back when we make the changes and if in july we amended the contract up to the budgeted amount of it happens to be more Square Footage then you know there 45. 8 million. There have been many arent a lot of sites in eastern facilities that we have been utilizing specifically for isi San Francisco to build a and the source inspection, complete will family home so if mainly welding from fabricators there are is one in noah valley throughout the west coast. Then it should be built to the extent it can support the house originally scanska identified they were going to use 4 major being proposed so im in favor of the project and opposed in facilities and they added had a favor the demolition and ill minor one, added also see what my fellow commissioners have to say. Commissioner moore. Additional facilities on top of the problem with this those original ones to cover the workload which needed isi particular building is not necessarily it is oversized size inspection and actually an a but its under drawn sameness is fund was added that also required some inspections. That added to the costs for the completely unspectacular cmo contract. Building and it bothers me it cmo contract had additional and had show you they spending basically broken down neighborness it is our in three areas, the isi code separation this building remind inspection, which is the major me very much the state street one, then other essential work wood discussion were there was a that has been requested of turner such as an additional building after which the set of eyes and ears during the neighbors came out and asked the supervisor to have interim second shift, waterproofing Quality Assurance and controls which helped w