hill. i mean, i think president trump has set into motion a series of events for which, frankly, his administration has not developed any sort of contingency planning around. so you know, there are going to be consequences that he's going to have to manage, whether it's the potential resurgence of isis, whether or not it's a humanitarian disaster, whether or not it's the turks and the syrians opening a new front. this has tremendous consequences down the road, and there's no national security process around this. like chris said, the president made this decision impulsively on a phone call, and i don't think they had any sense of how to manage the contingencies around this. >> kelly -- and i know you're not there right now, but you have been previously -- take us inside the national security council. how do they play this? what do they do? >> well, in a normal national security council process, there would be a series of options developed for the president, and those options would be weighed with their risks and consequences. but in this case, there wasn't that process. the president just made a decision, and now the nfc has to