>> there wasn't an answer. it was a filibuster. >> mr. jordan we will hear the witness's answer. have you concluded mr. holmes. >> vicious sir. >> thank you. mr. hymes. >> thank you, mr. chairman, dr. hill, mr. holmes, thank you for your testimony. dr. hill, you made a fairly dramatic comment in your statement to which the ranching member took some exception. i'm more interested in the ukraine piece of this. but you said some you on this committee appear to believe that russia in its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country and that somehow for some reason ukraine did. i'm really much more interested in the ukraine piece of this. but i do want to defend you briefly. i don't know what my colleagues believe, but i do have a pretty good sense of what the effects are of creating ambiguity, of lacking clarity and conviction around the russian attack on the election of 2016. in response to your comment, the ranking member offered up a report, which varies in material respects from the report that was created by