angle." to a fox news alert. president biden is set to speak at 7:45 p.m. eastern on the supreme court's immunity ruling. we'll bring it to you when he comes out. but, first: another great day for trump and another bad day for the liberal media my top line legal thoughts are cray cray. >> look like wearing red jerseys or even maga hats basically the supreme court said in the past week no rules for the powerful, no rights for the powerless. >> imperial presidency now made concrete. >> it is about an imperial court imperial presidency. >> contrary to the ridiculous hyperbole from the left today. the high court's ruling isn't issue earning in the second come'6" caesar. what does the actual 6-3 opinion say? quote the nature of presidential power entitles a former president from absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preexclusive constitutional authorities. and that there is no immunity for unofficial acts. in other words, the president should be allowed to perform his constitutional duties as president without fear that unscrupulous prosecutors will craft crimes out of thin air to arrest their political opponent. which is exactly what we have seen the biden department of justice do to president trump. but, rather than cool, calm, reasoning from the left, after all this ruling benefits democratic presidents as much as it does trump, well, cue the panic. >> we are headed for a disaster in a way it's hard to think through. >> god only know what is damage could be done. it's a big step forward to having authoritarian president. >> it's five alarm fire. trump's supreme court has decreed him a king. i don't know if i have ever seen you this emotional. >> yeah. it is. it's so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left thing the ruling gives the president? >> the president, like donald trump, can take a blatantly illegal act, slap the label, hey, this san official act. >> hurt a political opponent, according to this court, it doesn't matter. >> he could shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue in new york and get away with it. we hopefully will not see him test that theory. >> the president can task them to assassinate somebody? >> we don't know because this thing ping-pongs back and forth, -- i don't think. jason jason unfortunately this lunacy isn't just contained to the media. justice sotomayor's dissent claims that the president can order seal team 6 to assassinate a rival. organize a military coup. and take bribes with immunity. it's one thing for the media to engage in this brazen irresponsible fear-mongering, it's another when a sitting supreme court justice is undermining the court's ruling by claiming without a shred of evidence that this ruling would allow the president to commit such blatantly unconstitutional actions. as justin thomas explains, in this case, there has been much discussion about ensuring that a president is not above the law. but, as the court explains, the president's immunity from prosecution for his official acts is the law. exactly the law protects the president so that he can perform his official duties in office. and assassinating one's rivals clearly falls outside that official duty. and the ruling lays oought clear example in which the president has immunity. trump met with the acting attorney general and ore senior justice department and white house officials to discuss investigating purported election fraud. trump is absolutely immune from prosecution for alleging conduct involving his discussions with the justice department officials. this is common sense. but, we know why the left would rather cloud this case and the ora of authoritarianism rather than explain the actual details. there happens to be an election coming up and they need a boogie man. >> what does this mean? practically, i think it means if you are joe biden, if you are a democrat, who is running for the president, your path right now is clear. you have to run against the supreme court. you have to run against this decision. this is not america. if you want to make america great again, you got to return to the rule of law. >> jason: i always love it when they say they want to return to the rule of law. yeah, we gotcha. all right, joining us now is matt whitaker, former acting attorney general under president trump and chris landau, former law clerk for justices scalia and thomas. quite a resume, gentlemen. thanks so much, chris, i want to go to you, first. clarify what this law says because all this hyper vent a little from the left about what it would do and how dangerous donald trump would be under -- it's just -- i mean, it's absurd. >> yeah. you are absolutely right. may made the point earlier. the court held that the president has immunity for his official acts. okay. not for unofficial acts that are within the scope of authority. either under the constitution or under statutes. a lot of these hypotheticals that people are coming up with, shooting people on fifth a&e, ordering assassinations don't even arguably come within any of the president's authorities. but what is important is that the president have the ability to carry out his constitutionally appointed functions without fear of a lawsuit. which is what this case is about. >> jason: and msnbc guest says at the they are too hyperbolic to talk about assassinations for goodness sakes. watch this. >> strikes me as a little bit odd and, perhaps, hyperbolic that our, you know, successive president also become cold blood assassins and try to hide that conduct behind this case. i would tell everyone to take a breath. watch the hearing below and then reassess. >> jason: matt, what's your take on all of this? >> that's the last time he will be on msnbc. the real question here -- the real question here is that jack smith overreached. he engaged in the use of novel legal theories that have never been used before. you saw him loads earlier this week on the interference with official acts statute. and now you are seeing him being curtailed and his theory that no president has any immunity from any act whether official within its core functions or not, it is just not the way the law has been for 230 years of american history. so, you know, these folks that are just like losing their minds over sort of a very common sense approach to presidential immunity, i think, are -- would rather just win the 2024 election than somehow continue this great american constitutional republic for another 250 years or more. >> jason: cnn is saying that alvin bragg's case against president trump could also be in trouble. >> do not be at all surprised if we see in the next couple days a motion from donald trump's legal team to throw out the verdict in the new york state case because some of the evidence that was introduced in that case had to do with conversations donald trump had with his advisers, including hope hix while he was in office. >> chris, what's your take on all this? how many of these cases are going to be in deep trouble? >> you know, it's just -- again, i think people are exaggerating. i think people need to take a deep breath a and, again, this is about the constitution. we are going to be studying in this case in law schools. people are going to be analyzing this case in 100, 200 years. this is about the president, our constitutional separation of power. anybody who looks at this as just being about the trump case has no idea what they're talking about. i mean, the supreme court understands that it's making law for the ages and it doesn't matter. like, who is the president? i mean, this could protect joe biden's hide because he would be subject to prosecution for having failed to enforce the immigration laws if somebody was murdered, many people have been murdered by illegal aliens. they could say well, joe biden, you are criminally responsible for that bell well, guess what? that was his official act. i think that makes it very hard for him to be prosecuted. again, it protects the presidency. not president trump. >> jason: i think it was a very reasonable opinion and much needed. matt and chris, i got to keep moving. thank you so much for joining us tonight on "the ingraham angle." i could appreciate it. all right, the supreme court has taken a sledge hammer to the democrats wants main election strategy lawfare from the from january 6th ruling last week to the immunity warning. the democrats plan to throw their rival in jail rather than campaign on the serious issues. of the high court has taken the issue off the dableg tore democrats. if its ruling abortion pill and would restriction emergency abortions. joining us now is ned ryun fiewrnsd and ceo of merge american majority. president biden is set to come peek here in just over a half an hour. what do you think president biden is going to talk about because they are running out of things to run on. >> jason, your guess is as good as mine. who knows what will come the of biden's mouth based off thursday's debate. we have no idea if it will even make sense. but i think you are right. in some ways, rational people what is taking place with the scotus rulings should be devastating to democrats except democrats don't operated in reality. their talking points won't be in shambles because they are a series of intentional insane lies. they will continue to double down on them. i'm convinced that they know of no other way, neurotic left pedals nay know a and it dependent to their vase. they the keep power. i do think you are absolutely correct. jack smith, all of these things are starting to fall apart. they desperately wanted them to take place before november 5th because the very essence of them was political to take out the chief political opponent of joe biden. and it is collapsing. i think what it is also highlighting is it is one of the main re-election -- campaign election strategies for biden was the lawfare. and now they will have to try to run on issues and quiets frankly they don't have much to run on. >> jason: look, one of the most important rulings to many do out of the court i believe in this session was actually the ruling against chevron deference. that really does more to take a sledge hammer. >> yes. >> to the bureaucracy if people really understood what that is. ned, none other than aoc she is dom sphowt swinging quote the supreme court has within consumed by it's up to congress to defend our nation from this aauthor terrible tar cure. i attend articles of impeachment 'upon my huron does that concern you? >> you expect stupid people to say stupid things and aoc never disappoints. all the supreme court was doing olding up separation of power. the president is immune for official acts. not immunity for up ploicial and and really clarifying the boundary. they want nothing to do with separation of powers. that's why they probably find this so disorientinged that the supreme court actually says separation of powers. >> jason: ned, thank you again for joining us. >> thanks, jason. >> jason: a fox news alert. president biden planning to comment on the supreme court immunity ruling this hour. we'll bring it to you when he does. and up next, we now know who is in charge of biden. coming up next. ♪ into the things that keep our food fresher, our families safer, and our planet cleaner. to help us get there, america's plastic makers are investing billions of dollars to create innovative products and new recycling technologies for sustainable change. because when you push for smarter solutions, big things can happen. (♪) (♪) sandals rhythm and blues caribbean sale is now on. visit sandals.com or call 1-800-sandals. here's why you should switch fo to duckduckgo on all your devie duckduckgo comes with a built-n engine like google, but it's pi and doesn't spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. and there's no catch. it's fre. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you aroud join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today. ♪ >> jason: fox news alert. president biden planning to comment on the supreme court immunity ruling this hour. we'll bring it to you when he does. >> donald trump has a fragile ego, demands absolute royalty ly and has no impulse control. >> donald trump demands absolute loyalty from anyone that he supports. you have to believe everything he says. it's all about loyalty. loyalty to trump, loyalty, loyalty, loyalty. >> donald trump values loyalty above all else, even if he does not actually reciprocate it, ever. >> jason: for years the media has been saying that trump demands nor loyalty than a king that his voters turn on biden horrified by the president wants decline it's democrat elites that are now lining up to pledge allegiance. >> that whole abandon biden thing. that's the dumbest [bleep] that's i ever heard. >> it was bad night. it's a great presidency. >> very clearly, he should stay in this race. >> joe biden is not going to take himself out of this race nor should he. >> i told you it was a bad night. but it's not the end of the campaign. >> jason: is this what democracy looks like? and it's not just politicians, the donors are lining up as well. their loyalty comes with dollar sounds. after a disastrous debate, biden raises $33 million? does that make sense to anyone? and now we know who is really in control. it's been that way for a while. jill and hunter. politico reporting jill and hunter were the loudest voices urging biden to stay in power. you know why? jill biden likes president president and hunter biden what's he going to do for business? probably not sell as many of those paintings if he is not the president. well, it's because of what a laura, she has been talking about this for years. >> we know what biden and hits handlers do care about. catering to the rich donors and enriching their sleazy family members. biden's focus if he is capable of any focus at all, is enriching his family as much as possible before he leaves this earth. >> jason: joining us now former congresswoman who he served in congress with tulsi gabbard is a fox news contributor. she knows about putting her country before her party and she joins us now. tulsi, it's always good to chat with you. always good to see you. >> likewise. >> what's your take on what is happening here? because this doesn't look like democracy. they want to bypass all those voters and do whatever the heck they want. >> well, you will remember, jason that, they didn't really have a democratic primary at all. they didn't give democrat voters in that primary an option, but here we find ourselves as we see all of this inner squabbling happening amongst democrats and influential people in the democratic smear about whether or not joe biden should remain the nominee or whether they should swap him out. and you look at why this infighting is happening. it's because they don't really care about what's best for the country, quite frankly, when you look at it really they don't care about joe biden. this isn't about loyalty to joe biden. they are trying to figure out how best they can stay in power. so they are trying to figure out is joe biden that winning horse or do they need to put him out to pasture and find someone else that they believe can win who will also be a figure head that they can be the puppet masters for and control. so, you pointed out jill and hunter biden but really i think there is something far more serious going on here about who is really in control. clearly joe biden showed the country in the debate that he is incapable of being the president and commander-in-chief. clearly is not calling the shots. so we should all be asking who is really calling the shots? and it's what we know to be the deep state. it's those are who are an unelected positions political figures, the military industrial complex. the national security state. their friends in the propaganda media. everyone who gets their power by knowing that they can control this figure head, which is why they are doing all they can to destroy trump. they know that he will expose them and dismantle their power. >> jason: yeah, that's exactly right. these puppet tears they don't want to be pushed off to the side. i mean, that is clear. you sigh a lot of the discussion on x out there, but i tell you a lot of it isn't about the incompetency, the ability to physically and mentally do the job. it's whether or not they can win an election. that's what they seem to be much more concerned about. now, president biden is going to come out and talk about this, as soon as he comes out. we will bring it to you live. but, what do you think the president is going to say about this latest supreme court ruling? is this him trying to show vigor after 4:00 p.m.? >> it seems to be the case given how limited his exposure is to the media and frankly to the country normally. but as we have seen he will be likely reading off a teleprompter and, once again, just pointing to the fact that you know, he is not the guy. he is not the gay who is in charge. like you said, jason, they are -- the powers that be in the democrat elite are concerned about winning, which is why when you look at some of the names that they're putting forward, whether it be kamala harris or whitmer or gavin or any of these others they are not talking about how these people differ on issues or agree on issues. they are not talking about issues at all. they know that regardless of which one of them they pick to be their horse, they are all going to continue to follow the instructions of the unelected shadow government that is in blaze and, again, whose power something threatened by donald trump. >> jason: i just want to remind people that president biden is going to come out and make an address about this latest supreme court ruling. chance comes out. we will bring it to you live. tulsi, i want to show you actually one more ad that the democrats are actually putting out now and get your reaction to this ad that they are putting out. watch this. >> folks, i know i'm not a young man. i know how to do this job! i know right from wrong! i know how to tell the truth! [cheers] >> i know, like millions of americans know, when you get knocked down, you get back up. >> jason: i mean, what's your fake on that, tulsi? >> you know, they are picking and choosing these soundbites, once again, just blatantly lying to the american people. i will give you just two brief examples from that debate where joe biden did not tell the truth. number one is he said that no service member has been killed under his administration as someone who still wears the uniform, that was a punch in the gut because there are 18 service members who were killed while serving overseas under his watch. and for him to be so unaffected by their sacrifice and the fact fight of their families is just absolutely unacceptable. secondly in the debate he said the only existential threat to humanity. the only existential threat to humanity is climate change, which again, as commander-in-chief for him to not recognize the greatest existential threat is nuclear war, which he has pushed us closer to than ever before in our country's history is yet another piece of evidence of why he is unfit to serve in the office of the presidency. >> jason: tulsi, we want to thank you for your service to the country and thanks for joining us tonight on "the ingraham angle." do appreciate it. all right. i want to remind everybody president biden is set to react to the supreme court immunity ruling at any moment. we will bring it to you when it does. and, coming up: welcome do crazyville. democrats' latest attack against trump will make you wonder if they have actually truly lost their minds. ♪ ♪ my back got injured very bad. i was off work for about a year. i hear