>> dana: hello, everyone. i am dana perino, my ear just got blown out but i am all right. i'm here with judge jeanine pirro, jessica tarlov, greg gutfeld, it's 5:00 in new york city, and this is "the five." ♪ ♪ all right, the house set to vote any minute on making the impeachment inquiry into president biden official as his son claims maga republicans are targeting him and his family. enter biden showing up on capitol hill this morning and divinely ducking the closed-door deposition set up for him. and said of honoring a presidential subpoena, the president's son demanding a public hearing while lashing out at the g.o.p. lawmakers who wanted to question him.. >> for six years, i have been the target of the unrelenting trump attack machine, shouting "where's hunter?" well, here's my answer: i am here. but i am also here today to correct how the maga right has portrayed me for their political purposes. republicans do not want an open process where americans can see their tactics. expose their baseless inquiry. or hear what i have to say. what are they afraid of? i am here. i am ready. >> dana: but hunter biden choosing his words very carefully on if his father, joe biden, was involved in his business dealings. listen here. >> my father was not financially involved in my business. not as a practicing lawyer, not as a board member of burisma, not in my partnership with the chinese private businessman, not in my investments at home nor abroad. and certainly not as an artist. >> dana: you catch that? the first son keeping o speaking on camera, coming as a shock for most people but apparently not president biden. >> the president was certainly familiar with what his son was going to say, and i think what you saw was from the heart from his son. when it comes to the president and the first lady, they are proud of him, continuing to rebuild his life. they are proud of their son. >> dana: so what comes next for hunter? top republican james comer and jim jordan not letting a subpoena snuff slide, pledging to initiating contempt proceedings against the first son. jesse watters, i am sure you are watching this but you know a lot about it. he said "my father was not financially involved," did your ears perk up? >> jesse: well, that is a lie. and even if he wasn't financially involved, he is logistically involved, he is personally involved, he is politically involved, because when you fly your son to 15 countries, you are logistically involved. when you are personally involved, politically involved, when you are meeting with all of his clients at the white house come at the vice president's residence, ethical course, at the four seasons in los angelesy involved, and then doing favors for the client's leg when you are firing the prosecutor running the ukrainians a blank check, or you are not popping the balloon or shutting down the fbi task force on china, lifting trump tariffs on cheap solar panels, yeah, you're doing favors, writing letters of recommendation for the people -- come on. everybody knows he is involvr he and senate depositions, hours. they didn't pull theatrics like that. there is no way he is going to get away with this. he is racking up another charge, this guy has some nerve. i love how we say this guy is clean and joe biden is clean. where is the 1.6 million in cash that hunter biden withdrew over three years? no one is curious about where the cash went? is its own into windbreakers in joe's closet? i mean, you've got missing cash. you've got missing diamonds. no one is curious about where all of this goes? i mean, you've got hunter biden, and 2018, according to dave voice in the indictment, the indictment says hunter biden made $2.1 million in 2018 and he goes, there was no evidence of any business. he didn't conduct any business, and there was no business travel, so hunter biden is being indicted for not paying taxes on his bribes. that's what's going on here. and why were people bribing hunter biden? because he was selling access to the biden brand, obviously. >> dana: what is his legal position, judge? your thoughts? >> jeanine: first of all, in a not so legal phraseology, hunter biden gave congress the middle finger today. hunter biden is bound by the law, just like steve bannon and just like everybody else who has been held in contempt. steve bannon, from a time he refused to come in and honor the subpoena, within a year, he was sentenced, this can move quickly and it must. you can't go out there you can't say my father loves me and i had a problem and the maga people are after me. the maga people are not after you come hunter, what the maga people in every other american or after his equal justice. they don't want to hear about the guy making millions of dollars in foreign countries and then watching the policy play out in this country where it seems to benefit the other countries, as jesse has so eloquently laid out, whether it is popping the balloon, whether it is three days after there is a meeting and his son is told about the prosecutor on burisma, three days later, after hunter called his father, joe gets on a plane to ukraine and threatens withholding a billion dollars of our money that that prosecutor off my son's company. because that business, burisma, was corrupt, it was going down. they had to make sure i could pass muster on wall street, that is what that was all about. when hunter biden says "my father was not financially involved" come as a prosecutor, every antenna goes up. so if your father was not financially involved, first, you know, joe says he knows nothing of his sons business. next he is not involved in his business, now he is not financially involved. then it begs the question and it begs impeachment inquiry. how was he involved then? if he wasn't financially, tell me all the circuitous ways he was involved, and we do that with the emails, we do it with his so-called stolen laptop, which he has already admitted is his, and there is proof, pictures, photographs, emails, business partners, and the crazy part of this thing is he says, "i want to speak in front of the united states people." wait a minute, wasn't at the democrats, jesse, who had that impeachment inquiry in the bottom of the basement of the house, where nancy pelosi said for two years, you know, we've got to do it down here, we don't want anyone upstairs interfering -- >> jesse: and then they destroyed the tapes. >> jeanine: the last point i want to make is this. stop with this drug addiction nonsense. because a lot of the cones in the latest indictment are post addiction. all you have to do is read his book and know that he was no longer addicted and he still wasn't paying taxes. >> dana: he says, greg, it is the maga republicans coming after me. you might be able to get the media to write that story, but chris murphy is a democrat senator from connecticut, friendly with the bidens come he said a lot of the charges seem legitimate to him. >> greg: it was a stunning press conference, stunning for me to finally see hunter speak with pants on. it was disorienting, like seeing santa without a shirt on or jesse without his hairpiece, you just can't handle it. did you see his mouth move minus a crack pipe or a straw, like watching lazarus do a back flip, it was bizarre. he snubbed the closed-door death deposition because he does not like anything closed him including his laptop or his bate and he says he wants a public hearing because he probably didn't notice the l in public. but i will say this. i still would take him over his dad as president because this guy gets it done. this guy a successful. he is an american success story. and the judge is right. it's easy for us to focus on the hill they are and tragedy of his lifestyle, but it is also easy to exploit addiction as a shield. millions of people did not leverage political power and influence foreign cash, people with addictions who didn't deny their own child or try to blame an errant gun on illegal aliens or repeatedly lied to authorities or enjoy the protections of a famous name. there are millions of addicts who didn't do that. he just got a lot of breaks. he got more breaks than a million junkies, so i am glad that he is making amends. far be it from me to judge. but you can't blame others for impugning your own character, especially when it was a one-man show. and i mean, you know, who else -- talk about breaks, who else, a first-time artist gets an exhibit in soho, selling's's not for hundreds of thousands of dollars and we have no idea who is paying? he can play the victim card but no one else was filming him naked, it was not maga republicans. maga republicans are not pointing firearms near terrified sex workers. maga workers weren't slyly implying that if you don't do what he says, you know, the big guy he might, you know, come around, and maga republicans didn't write the emails about the big guy. i think the only way that hunter is a victim as he is a victim of his dad running for president. i think he was doing all of this stuff under the assumption that dad was retiring. and he was building a big, vast retirement fund for joe come and then joe all of a sudden is running and he is like, holy crap, you are out of your mind, and he was, still is, but now hunter is like, holy crap, now the spotlight is on him. >> dana: jessica, you have the floor. >> jessica: great, so much to choose from, like a lazy susan of crazy. so, i look forward to most likely be jesse who will next have jim jordan on his show, and you can ask him about the subpoena from a january 6th committee that he has flouted for years now. hasn't turned up. no respect for the rule of the law, as judge puro would say. so you can list all these other people, but i want to see jim jordan being pushed on that and i think you are the man to do it. hunter -- >> jesse: subpoenaed by jan six? and he -- so he can get arr arrested. speed two oh, right, because we control all of the law hunter made a lengthy statement about why he wanted to testify in public and there is some important details in it and i understand that he got subpoenaed a certain way for a closed-door testimony.y. but it matters when he gets clear examples of the fact that republicans have completely distorted his record, his bank records, his emails, and we saw what they did with the devon archer testimony, right? that emerge from that saying devon archer said that joe biden was behind this, et cetera, and you listen to the other people in the room, dana goldman, for instance, instance, eventually the transcript was produced where devon archer said the complete opposite, joe biden was not personally -- viktor shokin was not fired by joe biden to protect his son. first of all joe biden could not have gotten the international committee to do it. it is just a load -- >> greg: there was no large international community -- >> jessica: of course there was. christine lagarde. >> greg: international community. >> jessica: yes, it is. it is not one person, and senate republicans, whole bunch of them. republicans are freaking out because of the beginnings of this impeachment inquiry, which i've been going on or fact finding going on since they took the majority about a year ago has turned up absolutely nothing. >> jesse: really? >> jessica: really. you should be leading, or you should be leading, judge, because jim palmer is not up for this. jim jordan, site him again, on with marnie talking about what the impact is going to be, driving down biden's phone numbers come i don't know how pronounce his name, what's going to be the outcome of the impeachment inquiry? trump 2024, baby. this morning, maria bartiromo has nancy mace on. hey, nancy, nice to see you this morning, thanks for getting up early with us. what you got? where are the policy changes that came as a result of being paid off? nancy mace. i don't have anything. i said, go get -- i love being with you, but you had the committee, if you have all of the answers. congressman don bacon, probably not, about biden committing high crimes and misdemeanors. chuck grassley, i have no evidence what i can say the president is guilty. g.o.p. aides, obviously don't want to lose their jobs, an unmitigated disaster, comer has lost control, and he has botched this bad. >> jesse: catch your breath. i can just name one right there. the russian billionaire gave him $3.5 million, and of course panorama, and that he left the lady off the sanctions list! right there! >> dana: we will have more to come on this. >> jeanine: the russian lady and hunter biden -- >> dana: one thing to be sure of, the commercial break is going to be real hot. house expected to vote soon on whether to launch a bite and impeachment inquiry. we'll keep you updated. harvard reviewers trying to cover up the plagiarism scandal surrounding its president. ♪ ♪ my most important kitchen tool? my brain. so i choose new neuriva ultra. unlike some others, it supports 7 brain health indicators, including mental alertness from one serving. to help keep me sharp. try new neuriva ultra. think bigger. (husband) ♪ hey there family! while you're shopping, ♪ ♪ get me a 5g phone, it's on my list. ♪ (w(wife) instead of doing all of this a better plan is to switch to verizon. (avo) this holiday turn any samsung phone, in any condition, into a galaxy s23+ on us. and now add netflix and max to your plan for just $10 a month. only on verizon. my a1c was up here; now, it's down with rybelsus®. his a1c? it's down with rybelsus®. my doctor told me rybelsus® lowered a1c better than a leading branded pill and that people taking rybelsus® lost more weight. i got to my a1c goal and lost some weight too. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. need to get your a1c down? you may pay as little as $10 per prescription. municipal bonds don't usually get the media coverage the stock market does. in fact, most people don't find them all that exciting. but, if you're looking for the potential for consistent income that's federally tax-free, now is an excellent time to consider municipal bonds from hennion & walsh. if you have at least 10,000 dollars to invest, call and talk with one of our bond specialists at 1-800-217-3217. we'll send you our exclusive bond guide, free. with details about how bonds can be an important part of your portfolio. hennion & walsh has specialized in fixed income and growth solutions for 30 years, and offers high-quality municipal bonds from across the country. they provide the potential for regular income... are federally tax-free... and have historically low risk. call today to request your free bond guide. 1-800-217-3217. that's 1-800-217-3217. ♪ ♪ >> jesse: liberal universities don't know what a woman is, and now they are not sure what a plagiarist is, either. harvard's embattled president claudine gay getting caught any major plagiarism scandal that's only getting worse. "the new york post" claims harvard spent weeks secretly investigating gay's alleged academic dishonesty, but covered it up. harvard even used an expensive law firm to threaten the post when they started asking questions. that according to the school's paper, gay has been copying and pasting for a long time. check out the meaty chunks of text she lifted on her dissertation. look at those meaty chunks. [laughter] one of many examples. but harvard has already done its own sham investigation and cleared gay. greg, she is fine. it's just a bunch of meaty chunks. >> greg: here is a question to blow left-wing mines. that is racist to fire dr. gay because she happens to be black, why is it not racist to keep her employed because she is black? or aren't they both racist? especially since she is obviously incompetent. she checked boxes but they never checked her work. for that reason. the problem with the ei, diversity hires, they create a future problem in the person you hire. first you narrow the field of applicants, just decided whole group cannot be there, you are going to eliminate a lot of very qualified people. and then the person you choose assumes they are set for life because if you are hiring someone to write a racial wrong, firing them erases the so-called progress you just made, so they replace merit, which is a scourge of whiteness, with dti, which is why there are no merits in dei come it is meritless because they are identity markers. you lose out on experience and confidence and you end up with, harris, the last marvel movie. they are going to redefine plagiarism because that is what they do. i think it is going to be no different than these smash and grab but of words. you can take up to a thousand words and get away with it, exactly, going to run out -- take everything you want for the encyclopaedia britannica, that is a boomer reference, and then they can't let go of this. the full house of race cards collapses. >> jesse: they called it not plagiarism put in appropriate citations. >> dana: like the shoplifting of words will be behind the counter at cvs. in order to say anything you are going to have to go and ask a staff member to unlock the cabinet so you can make up some words. this reminds me of the covid hypocrisy of some of the governors. we had a new some going to the french laundry. witmer flying when she was not supposed to. the mayor of d.c., danced at a wedding when you are not supposed to be. all of this -- you all have to comply with the plagiarism rules, but i don't because i am claudine gay, and so right now you also have somebody from the naacp said that gay's -- the attacks on gay's administration is part of a white supremacist agenda but last i checked, the only one who got fired so far is a white woman. and also, harold brought up the other day the example of an stanford which was about in appropriate citation, he was cleared of any wrongdoing and they still fired him. so i think a lot of this is just making people realize that harvard is going to have to dumb down its requirements in order to keep her. >> jesse: jessica, so if you were the board chair of harvard and you just hired this woman, i believe this year, and not only do you find out she is a plagiarist but she thinks screaming "kill all jews is fine, what would you do?" >> jessica: i would really struggle with this on the free-speech level, and people of gone back and looked through the codes of conduct, especially the pen pen code, saying this is a tricky one but as dana pointed out when you are getting prepped by all of these lawyers, it is time we reevaluate the code because we know if we had supplemented jew for any other protected group that would never stand on campuses. the plagiarism issue... it's complicated. what the journalists, the young journalist at "the crimson" did, they do incredible work, the past few years when you think of what went on at stanford that they took down a professor, student journalism is such an important asset. >> dana: found to do no wrong, but still -- that is what i was just talking about. >> jessica: bad example, i guess. they said in "the crimson" that it showed there were violations under harvard's current policies around plagiarism and academic integrity, so that implies current standards versus old standards. i know when i submitted my phd, there was software that we put it through, and that is a new thing that you can do that. and it was one of the scariest sets of weeks of my life, thinking, did i miss something? i hired someone, as well, paid them out of poet to check my phd because the last thing you want going before the committee is they say you improperly cited this or you lifted this, and there is -- not to use the cvs joke, but there is a certain amount of text you can lift from other people where they say it is understandable because academic work is premised -- >> jesse: but those are some meaty chunks, jessica. look at those meaty chunks on the screen. >> jessica: the issue is right now right now claudine gay would not be rewarded her phd, but when she did write those articles, that she violated harter's policy appeared to be when i'm not so sure about that. their old policy does not allow meaty chunks like that. >> jeanine: i don't know, what did they comup with, 20-something instances -- okay, the woman lifts for a living. she is like joe biden of plagiarism. the amazing part of this is what the left does is they want to protect you, than what they do is they just change the definition. they changed the law. so plagiarism isn't really what you think it is. if you miss a comma or a quote here or there is no problem, if the laws don't work for people in your tribe, i always refer to it as a tribe, then change it. you dig deeper in this, you find out that harvard cleared her of breaching the standards of plagiarism. and it turns out the guy who was involved is a guy named swaim and when "the new york post" called harvard and they were looking into the allegations of plagiarism by claudine gay, they threatened them with a high-powered law firm, with defamation, if the post printed anything about claudine gay, and i think they sent them like a 17-page letter threatening them. but this guy swain as part of the biden-harris transition team. he was an aide to hillary clinton. okay? so for the left, they can't have anyone take out someone and make it look like it is a success by people on the right who believe in the law and following the l law. this isn't, to me, a tribal thing. they don't care. they talk out of both sides of their mouth. and this is a woman who said free-speech is alive and well at harvard, and then two days later shuts down a conservative event. i mean, they just -- they are not -- they are not fair about -- >> jesse: well if i was a harvard student, i would plagiarize all year. all year long. >> greg: what's stopping you now? let's just plagiarize all the time. >> jesse: why would i do that, greg? i have academic honor. up next, shock comic daniel tosh thinks cancel culture is actually a good thing. ♪ for moderate to severe crohn's disease skyrizi is the first il-23 inhibitor that can deliver remission and visibly improve damage of the intestinal lining. serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or a lower ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms, had a vaccine or plan to. liver problems may occur in crohn's disease. control of crohn's means everything to me. ask your gastroenterologist about skyrizi. ♪ control is everything to me ♪ learn how abbvie could help you save. my name is dana bellefeuille, and my husband and i own the village bakery located in hayden, idaho. our mission is to employ people with different abilities. tiktok is allowing us to show what acceptance looks like on a day-to-day basis, here at the bakery. this is a community of just complete and utter love. it's the people that lift you up when you're down. people on tiktok do that on a daily basis, and i've never found a community like that, ever. we're traveling all across america talking to people about their hearts. - how's the heart? - good. - you sure? - i think so. how do you know? let me show you something. put two fingers right on those pads. look at that. that's your heart. that is pretty awesome. with kardiamobile, you can take a medical grade ekg in just 30 seconds from anywhere. kardiamobile is proven to detect atrial fibrillation, one of the leading causes of stroke. for a limited time, kardiamobile is available for just $74. hurry, these prices won't last. get kardiamobile today at kardia.com or amazon. ♪ ♪ >> jeanine: comedian daniel tosh is best known for his edgy and shocking brand of comedy that many find offensive. but fans are scratching their heads after he defended cancel culture. tosh making the case that sometimes backlash is deserved. >> what's your feeling on cancellation? >> i think it's great. cancel people. i think people deserve it. you know, obviously it is not a real thing. oh, your livelihood is gone. >> yeah. >> but as someone who has done things and said horrible things constantly, i have had backlash. and i deserve it. there has to be consequences, and i also don't think that there is a problem with evolving and like, oh, i use to be able to say this and now i can't. well, fine, good, i am okay with that. >> jeanine: okay, greg. >> greg: i am really confused. >> jeanine: who is he? >> greg: i don't know. also, it says "talk show" but she is interviewing him. someone interviews this guy and asks him what happened to him and he tells them. i think this is, a, he is lying or he is stupid, and as jim noya dan pointed out last night on my show, there are reams of peoplee canceled, you can go back, and sl with shane gillis, look at roseanne, gilbert gottfried, small business owners, assorted regular folks on social media. i think this guy is trying to insert himself in a debate that really no longer exists. and this point was made last night, he is trying to get an in back in the entertainment industry, hoping to get a role in a judd apatow movie, the last remaining wokesters and he thinks this is the way forward, kimmell and howard stern were able to move past all of the black face stuff by it being extremely liberal and maybe he thinks this is his way because he missed the boat. all of these amazing "edgy" comedians, they are doing great. you look at the podcast, tim dillon, which is amazing, andrew scholz, and then you have locals and rumble, which is russell brand on there. tucker has a new network. everyone is doing great post cancellation except for him because he wasn't around so i think that is the strategy. >> jeanine: was he ever canceled? >> greg: his show was canceled because of ratings not because of content. >> jeanine: dana, i will go to you. he personally was never canceled. >> dana: this is the most research i've had to do in a long time. never ever have i heard of the guy. i thought there was a misspelling on the sheet. a shock jock, edgy comedian, i try to watch a lot of comedy, literally never heard of the guy, and i think the roughest punishment for comedians is when your jokes fall flat to pay or go i don't want people to be canceled, to never have a job again, but if you are not funny, like "snl"'s cold opens have been panned for days because it is terrible, that is the best kind of cancellation. >> jeanine: speaking of cancellation, jesse, he feels like he supports -- this is his favorite kind of cancellation, getting rid of family members. as soon as i see the way they vote on issues, he has no problem canceling his family. >> jesse: i used to watch that show. "tosh.0". not a lot, but i would flip and when i would land, i would stay. he was all right. i don't think he understands what cancel culture means. cancel culture, 2017, this espn tennis analyst doug algar was doing a venus williams match and said that venus was using guerrilla tactics, in terms of hit-and-run. and he was fired. that is not gorilla tactics, it is guerilla. do nothing to do with a guerrilla. that is cancel culture. the o'reilly book, "killing the witches," and you can see how it all starts, it was this frenzy driven by young people, young women were freaking out and going like this and labeling women, and without any due process, the preacher or the sheriff would then hang them and if you said you weren't a witch, that meant you were, and then they would kill you, and behind the scenes, a lot of it, when they were fingering these women, there were other financial motivations -- because there was a widow or someone like that. >> jeanine: okay, do you want to follow-up to what jesse was talking about? did d you read "killing witches" >> jessica: no. >> greg: some doctor you are. >> jesse: dr. tarlov. >> jessica: i think jesse is right about this, two stratosphere's of cancellation because the guy calling serena williams match, and then the most prominent example of an uncancellation that i think deserves to be reinstated and then some is that alex jones, who, you know, said that sandy hook was a false flag, was $1.5 billion to the families -- tortured families who lost their five and 6-year-olds, at elon musk does a twitter poll and he is back on and within a second, elon musk is in a spaces room with him, and whatever else was going on in that room. with andrew tate, someone else who i think deserves not to be heard from again. so i think people should come and we talked about this during the #metoo era, need to be precise about what they are doing and who deserves to be booted from polite society and the stratosphere more generally. harvey weinstein and al franken in the same sentence, not talking about alex jones and this commentator in the same sentence about cancel culture. >> jeanine: free speech absolutist, i see. coming up, a walk to school failing a student for saying only women can get pregnant. ♪ ♪ is all about presents and shopping and cookies and trees. but we know christmas isn't about something you buy at a store. it's about something so much greater. it is the day we celebrate the incredible truth that god so loved the world that he gave his only son. it's not about presents. it's about jesus. join me this advent in praying every day on hallow. cut through the noise and find god's peace. my mental health was much better. but i struggled with uncontrollable movements called td, tardive dyskinesia. td can be caused by some mental health meds. and it's unlikely to improve without treatment. i felt like my movements were in the spotlight. #1-prescribed ingrezza is the only td treatment for adults that's always one pill, once daily. ingrezza 80 mg is proven to reduce td movements in 7 out of 10 people. people taking ingrezza can stay on most mental health meds. ingrezza can cause depression, suicidal thoughts, or actions in patients with huntington's disease. pay close attention to and call your doctor if you become depressed, have sudden changes in mood, behaviors, feelings, or have thoughts of suicide. don't take ingrezza if you're allergic to its ingredients. ingrezza may cause serious side effects, including angioedema, potential heart rhythm problems, and abnormal movements. report fevers, stiff muscles, or problems thinking as these may be life threatening. sleepiness is the most common side effect. it's nice. people focus more on me. ask your doctor about #1 prescribed, once-daily ingrezza. ♪ ingrezza ♪ sofia vergara: dwight was a 13-year-old kid with cancer, when he came to st. jude. dwight: this kid is now 73 years old. sofia vergara: that's what we do at st. jude. marlo thomas: give thanks for the healthy kids in your life, and give a gift that could last a lifetime. hey, grab more delectables. you know, that lickable cat treat? de-lick-able delectables? yes, just hurry. hmm. it must be delicious. delectables lickable treat. i hear it all the time. people tell me they'd love to buy gold. but because it's gold - they think it must be complicated. it isn't. not with rosland capital. with rosland... the entire process from start to finish is built on one concept... one... keep... it... simple. rosland capital - a trusted leader in helping people acquire precious metals. gold bullion, lady liberty gold and silver proofs, and our premium coins, can help you preserve your wealth. call rosland capital at 800-630-8900 to receive your free rosland guide to gold, gold & precious metals ira, and silver brochures. with rosland, there are no hassles, no gimmicks, and our shipping is fast and reliable. remember. keep it simple. make gold your new standard. call rosland capital today at 800-630-8900, 800-630-8900. that's 800-630-8900. ♪ ♪ >> greg: working in the kremlin with a two-headed dog. this is a fox woke school alert. a seattle high school student failing a basic quiz on gender after correctly stating facts about human biology. taking a test and ethnic studies world history class -- what the hell is that? answering true on a statement that said all men have penises. it is true only women can get pregnant. sounds like a set up. seattle public schools defended the gender quiz as inclusive and a statement to our producer then said the results did not impact the student's final grades. so dana, not only did this kid point out that the emperor has no clothes, but he also has a enis and can get pregnant. >> dana: it was just a quiz and didn't count. that's actually not the point. the other thing is the mom got involved. she heard about this and had to get involved and that was a level of parental involvement that i truly can't understand. my parents had no idea, find a chemistry test, they had no idea what was going on. parents are really having to pay a lot more attention now. maybe they should have before, but it would have turned out better. >> greg: you know, jessica, they defended under the guise of inclusivity, which means inclusivity does not include science. i mean, they actually trump science with inclusivity. we want to make everybody st stupid. but because of inclusivity. what say you, dr. tarlov? >> jessica: and makes people think you are mocking me when you say that. if i saw a question like that on a test i would know it was a gotcha. you know what you're supposed to answer. that doesn't mean that it wasn't... a misplayed lesson, let's say. what they were going for is the idea obviously that gender is a social construct and sex is your biology, you were born male or female, penis or vagina. but i don't like this. and especially because if you are saying it doesn't count, that means you are not serious about it. so this is seriously what you want to be teaching, and that is now how the conversation goes about gender being a construct, which is how you get people who were born female but live as male that are pregnant and are going to give birth, it should count toward your grade if you're going to do it. otherwise you shouldn't do it. >> greg: it was definitely a stunt, judge. >> jeanine: wait a minute. born as female, but a male -- >> jessica: a trans man can be biologically female. >> jeanine: i would be stupid in every class at this point. did you get that, jesse? >> jesse: no, i am still trying to figure it out. >> jessica: transmission -- >> jesse: what does that even mean? >> jeanine: it's a social construct. i don't know what that means, either. >> greg: it's a babylon bee article that came through. >> jeanine: you know what it is? it is all fantasy. it is an allusion. it is their way of having our kids to make something that is real to them is not real. you are taking the truth away from young children. it is not right. the reason this parent is involved, dana, thank god, is because of covid. >> dana: yeah, yeah, yeah. >> jeanine: you've got to go. >> dana: there is a fox news alert. the house now voting on making the impeachment inquiry into president biden official. official. aishah hasnie, are you on capitol hill for us? can you tell us what is going on? >> i am. hello to you. standing outside the house chamber a few steps away and i am watching this happen on c-span right now so i can talk to you about it as it is happening. yes, we are now watching this impeachment inquiry vote and inquiry into president biden, and just a flagging for our viewers, this is not a vote for impeachment, it is a vote to laununch an official impeachment inquiry, and the reason republicans, house republicans, want to do that is because they feel like the white house and the president have not been forthcoming in their investigation and have not been turning over documents and records, telephone records and things of that nature, so they feel they need this inquiry, this official inquiry, to be able to gain more substantial subpoena power. now we are looking for a magic number, and we won't really know it until we have the total number of people that have voted. but i will say that if all 434 members are voting, then the magic number is 218. i do believe we have technical absences on this boat. >> johnson, dana, believes he has the votes. he has been saying that for a few days now. and he feels like he is pretty confident that this is going to pass, and to bhonest with you, if any house republican, perhaps a moderate, perhaps a former biden district, someone who is vulnerable in this next election, may have been double minded about voting for this tonight, perhaps. their decision-making shifted a little bit this morning after what they saw with hunter biden coming to the capital and basically defying that subpoena and deciding he was not going to take part in that deposition, that private deposition, that news conference, and basically driving away. we are watching to see how this all comes down. you can see 193 yeas on the republican side so far at all of those democrats are voting nay so far. just to see how this all plays out in the next couple moments, data. >> greg: thanks, aishah, you got us caught up on there. it does appear, jesse, that republicans will have the vote. a very small margin. you can only lose three and they are definitely going to lose one, ken buck, i believe, the congressman from colorado has said he will not vote for it for he has his reasons. if they get a 218 and you get this formal inquiry, then january shaping up to be a very different kind of month for president biden. >> jesse: it is not going to be a good january, except for january 6th, that is their holiday. they love january 6th. kind of like your july 4th. [laughter] all it is is an investigation. the democrats should just relax if joe did nothing wrong. why don't they just stop stonewalling and provide evidence. >> jessica: turned over everything. >> jesse: no, they have into. >> jessica: yes, they have. >> jesse: no, they haven't. hunter biden has been fighting the subpoena for an entire year. >> jessica: this is about jobide hunter biden. >> jesse: the accountant has not testified, the guy that set up the 20 llcs. by the way, what kind of business, jessica, dr. tarlov, with no website, no website, needs 20 shell companies. what legitimate business needs 20 shell companies and burner phones and encrypted apps? can you name one company? no! it is because of this was a scam, jessica. it's a big fat scam. >> jessica: was it a big fat scam that changed u.s. policy? >> jesse: sure, i just na named -- >> jessica: that is not true. >> jesse: what's not true? >> jeanine: what's not true? >> jessica: the thing about -- >> dana: can i jump in? they have the votes. we are at 219, 220. they only lost the one. >> jesse: i just want to mention the fact that you said i could get greg pregnant. you said men could get pregnant. how can i get greg pregnant? >> greg: you're going to have to get me drunk first. [laughter] i'm not easy, jesse. >> dana: now 221. >> jesse: explain it, jessica. >> dana: the other thing is, all republicans voted yes, even -- can you confirm, did ken buck also do the same? he did. one thing that is going to happen in january, the president will definitely do, is the democrats are going to use this opportunity to fund raise like crazy. to try to pull everybody together. the democrats have been splintering off into these different groups. this is unhappy. now you have the inquiry, it is formal. the fundraising piece, probably on both sides, everybody likes to raise money on everything but this one for the democrats they are going to use it a lot. >> jeanine: but i wonder how this is going to look for joe biden and the party. does joe biden, will he be the candidate? in the election in 2020? is this going to continue to kind of cut at him? and are the gavin newsoms and the rest of them going to start coming out because they smell blood in the water? because there is no question there is blood in this water. if you've got all of this evidence that jesse has been talking about and i have been talking about, without the doj, without the fbi, by congress, and you've got millions of dollars and your grandkids getting money and a former fbi director, louis free, gave joe biden's grandchildren $100,000 because he said i want to go into business with hunter, that was an incredible scandal going on and everyone in washington knew about it. i think this is worse than joe can imagine in terms of his not being the candidate. >> dana: so this is an inquiry, not an actual impeachment. >> greg: impeachment inquiry, impeachment, impeachment palouse, i am here for it. the democrats invented law fair. they are trying to take the leading republican presidential candidate off the ballot. they are trying to put him in jail. with some trumped up b.s. >> jessica: 91 counts made up? >> greg: let's keep counting the same one over and over and over again. times zero is still zero dr. tarlov. i love this because of the democrats tied up the government during the rise of covid with impeachment proceedings. god knows how this would have turned out, the disease, if we hadn't been doing that. so turnabout is fair play. i'm here for it. maybe this will be a battle not for the white house but who is in the big house. first. because joe broke more laws. speed to convict him -- >> greg: why are they going after trump and not going after joe? hypocrisy. >> jessica: return the documents be at >> jeanine: take the documents anywhere. >> dana: we have a real treat. peter doocy is at the white house, not the big house. we don't think. wright, peter doocy? tell us what the white house is thinking today as this happens on capitol hill. all republicans voting for impeachment inquiry of joe biden. >> what we are hearing of a biden white house is they think that congress has better things to do than scrutinize a private citizen in hunter biden. so while they dismiss the premise of this, they have been getting ready over the last few months, they have been staffing up a war room over across the west executive driveway, in the executive office building, and they have some lawyers in there, a lot of comms pros and are going to push back as hard as they can, as congress now gains this new tool to get information that they say they were not getting from the biden white house. karine jean-pierre, when she goes out to the camera, she will dispute that by saying, well, we have been forthcoming about everything. there have been certain things around here that they have not wanted to come forth with because this vote had not happened. so they are going to lose an excuse here at the biden white house not to comply because something is unconstitutional about a vote. the vote happened. it is constitutional now. joe biden is not getting impeached. at least, at this moment given nobody around here is acting like that is a real possibility. they are now going to have to do a lot more driving up and down with boxes of documents come up and down pennsylvania avenue between here and the rayburn staff room off one of these conference rooms on the hill, dana. >> dana: peter doocy, thank you so much. i am sure there will be a lot of activity there. ian sams heading up communications. the war room is going to be hopping. jessica, let's get you back in here. >> jessica: yeah, just to >> jessica: just to piggy gang on what the judge was saying. no one wants this. this whole idea that it can end up helping you out i think that any sane person -- and i'm even including donald trump in that bucket, i would rather not have been impeached. but the senate is not going to vote to convict. it will be the same thing that happened with donald trump. >> greg: they tried to impeach donald trump. >> jes >> jessica: he was impeached. >> greg: knew it was going nowhere and they still did it. that's my point. >> jessica: advantage that they could actually make clear. right. exactly. >> greg: it's pointless. this is pointless. except symbolically you guys deserve it. >> jessica: we don't fear it the way you think we do. >> greg: i don't care. i'm mad we are not doing taylor swift. >> jessica: two nights in a row no taylor swift. >> dana: do you think joe biden thinks taylor swift is overrated. >> greg: he thinks taylor swift is a man who mends his clothes. >> dana: that's a good one. jesse, how are you going to cover this tonight? >> jesse: so far the white house has been able to control the special counsel's -- they have been able to control the u.s. attorneys. they have been able to control the people here in manhattan. the people in georgia. this is not in their control. so, if they do go from an inquiry to an actual impeachment, you are going to have live testimony in the chamber. it's going to be covered by this network, other networks. c-span, it's going to be all over. you can't run away. you can't say there is no evidence. you can't hide from it. you're going to have witness testimony and whistleblower testimony. you're going to have documentary evidence. they are going to maybe not have a hollywood producer like the january 6th. there is going to be big exhibits that's going to show where the money went and you're going to see testimony from everybody. >> jessica: we're going to have flow charts. >> jesse: see the accountant have to testify under oath. you are going to have to see tony bobulinski, devon archer. you are going to have to see all of these people get up there and swear under oath they are telling the truth. frank biden, the brother. jimmy biden, the brother. this is not going to be as simple as you think to ignore, jessica. this is going to be incredibly painful. they are going to scrutinize every little crevice in the biden family. and i don't know if they're going to be able to survive it. >> greg: they went after trump's family like they were the gambinos. let's not pretend oh don't go after the biden family. >> judge jeanine: what's going to happen here is they are going to give you a timeline. they have parallel timelines as to what joe biden was doing. what hunter biden was doing. and what was going on in the world. you have got this devon archer and i think it's eric schwerin, he was meeting in the white house with joe biden. he has got emails. joe biden is using pseudonyms regarding policy. hunter biden is getting information about united states policy from joe biden's office. and then you're going to see the prosecutors -- the congress people tying that together with policy and the collection of money. why is joe biden the point man on energy in the ukraine when he is v.p. and everybody knew hunter was involved. this is going to be ugly. and it's going to prove that they were dirty. that what they were doing is collecting money with the united states being for sale. and you can say all you want, what you want about donald trump. but there is nothing worse than collecting money from foreign oligarchs because you're vice president and turning u.s. policy based upon your collection of money that's what the bidens are all about. >> jessica: what if you are withholding aid democratic ally until they go and dig up dirt on political opponent which is what donald trump was doing. >> judge jeanine: that aid went through. >> jessica: [inaudible] jump, jump, let's see how high. >> dana: what we have seen this is a preview much the debate that's to come. we know what the sides are i want to read to you from the house speaker. he put out a statement today saying that the house took a critical step in our investigation serious matters involving president joe biden by formally openings an impeachment inquiry. but the line that really stuck tout me is we do not take this responsibility lightly and will not prejudge the investigation's outcome. but, the evidentiary record is impossible to ignore. so that's what we have all been talking about here. we will see. >> greg: dana? >> dana: yes, sir. >> greg: i would like to point out that taylor swift was named times person of the year joining past winners hitler and stalin. i want to point that out to everybody at home. >> jessica: and that it is her birthday. >> greg: it is her birthday and she is 47. >> judge jeanine: she is 34. >> dana: did you get invited to the party? >> greg: we dated back in the 90's. >> dana: that's what that song is about? my god. that's it for us, everyone. ♪ >> mike: good evening, welcome to washington. i'm mike emanuel in for et