from kentucky and five other states now reeling after that wave of deadly tornadoes this weekend. we will also show you how democrats, the mob, the media are now trying to politicize this horrific natural disaster but first, our account continues, we won't stop. >> americans held hostage behind enemy lines day 121. >> sean: 134 days since joe biden promise not to abandon americans now according to "the washington post," evacuations have as we told you they would predictably slowed to a trickle. the administrations as the process is now limited by the realities on the ground and the taliban-controlled islamic emirates of afghanistan. the biden administration laughably promised we have all the leverage and the terrorists and the taliban over them to secure the release of those on the ground that they abandoned there that was and remains a blatant lie. one senior state department official is telling the post that a real evacuation is no longer possible. "when you don't have people in the country, there is not really a functioning airport and arguably, there are tens if not hundreds of thousands who have fallen to the broad category of at risk so make no mistake, this is a serious ongoing crisis without any obvious solution completely preventable cause and perpetrated by joe biden and hope now has diminished and sadly it appears that americans, military families, thousands of green card holders that are eligible to live in this country, our afghan allies will not be getting out for years if at all. now, it is one of the many self-inflicted crises responsible for joe biden's plummeting poll numbers. look at this, new abcs news survey, only 28% of people approved of his handling of inflation in the economy, a measly 36% approve of his handling of crime. his overall approval rating now is underwater by around ten points in nearly every single poll. the only person pulling worse than joe biden is his choice of a vice president, kamala harris. in fact, no vice president in u.s. history has a lower approval rating than kamala harris and maybe that's because the vice president is terrible at her job. for example, ever since she was appointed borders, has done nothing to resolve the crisis. she did make a 30 minute trip near the border, not where she needed to be in el paso. nowhere close to where the migrant surge was actually happening and a useless trip to the southern border, made a trip to central america to see the problems going on there. along with a whole phone call to the president of guatemala. that's one in nine months. that's it. take a look. >> is vice president harris still in charge of addressing the root problems? >> she is and i just announced a commitment that she is announcing this afternoon. >> why is it she has not spoken to the president of guatemala since june? six months. >> i did see this kind of strange report from the president of guatemala saying that he has had no contact with the white house which is inaccurate. >> he said vice president harris, he has not spoken to her and if she's in charge, why is that? >> we have had a range of conversations that has been reflected in our readout we put last week with our national security advisor. >> sean: yet another massive caravan, another is headed our way, kamala harris has no plan of action, no resolution, no future plans to visit the border, absolutely nothing. by the way, are you surprised at this point, is anybody surprised? according to reports, harris often refuses to read briefings, is frequently unprepared for the daily challenges that she would face is vice president and get this, instead of actually doing her job, she now spends countless hours berating her own staff according to numerous reports allegedly kamala harris is such a menace that some are openly referring to her as a soul destroying bully. of course, amid lashing out at her own employees, also found time to redecorate her own office with carefully curated art pieces and all white furniture set, brand-new light, blue collar for the walls and apparently according to her, the border crisis can wait. her office was in desperate need of a makeover. mike pence apparently doesn't share the same decorating taste but the ridiculous headlines about her will not be a distraction. it is now imploring her to get serious writing "the president is old and his judgment questionable. she seems out of her depth. we will have another three years of >> griff: sadly, the answer is yes. sadly, i have to agree. joining us with more, fox news contributor ari fleischer and a former trump white house chief of staff reince priebus. we will begin with you. again, we are still at this point where we have one crisis after another and no solution on the horizon and no shift in policy. today, double down on build back better socialism and arm-twisting of joe manchin. we don't know how that went and if it went well, they will get there build back better socialism which is estimated to be 5 trillion. >> first of all, what's happening in the white house is taking a drama and the white house to a whole new level. everything you just read out between kamala harris and the president is a knife fight that we just don't see very often, yes. we have some drama and every white house, but to have planted stories between the oval office and down the hallway to the vps office is intentional, it's real, it's not made up, and the reason is kamala harris is a total liability to the president. she doesn't offer any balancing political philosophy to the president unlike you mentioned pence who was conservative and conventional, she doesn't offer any different base of support from the president unlike pence who was a faith-based conservative. worse yet from being a liability, she's an anchor. you just said she's at 28% approval. that puts her at the level of divorce lawyers and lobbyists who represent countries that everybody hates. that's the territory. >> sean: a friend of mine says that. >> it is a bad situation. >> sean: soul crushing bully is the term that people are using. she tried the video with child actors has you know, ari fleischer. this is your area of expertise, crisis management. also, people are leaving in droves, she has brought in a pr team for an image makeover. i don't see any changes as of now and joe biden seemingly doesn't want to even acknowledge her at bob dole's funeral. >> a pr team full of children reading off of a script for a spontaneous event. she is in overhead, so was the president. at least the president is less in over his head than she is. we have to pray for his good health so we don't get hurt. when you look at her boss, i think it's fair to say since joe biden took office, he has the reverse midas touch. what issue has he not botched? the american people largely want to withdraw from afghanistan. energy independence, we were a free independent country. he botched our energy. the southern border. our southern border was secure. american people want a secure border and humane immigration policies pretty delivered neither. almost every issue he botched largely because the biggest on his watch has been going well. and they've become a welcome party. that's the core of the botch. >> sean: if you want to fix the border problem, you have to go back to the trump policies that worked. you want to fix the energy problem which would impact inflation which is now at a 39 year high, you go back to the trump policies on energy and the economy. you want to fix foreign policy issues, you will have to get a little tougher and a little bit more awake than joe biden is and aware and a little tougher. i don't see that joe biden has the ability to stand up to russia and say we are going to supply all the energy needs of our western european allies, he wouldn't do that. he needs to say to china we are not going to import a single product from your country unless you stop saber rattling with taiwan. those things would work. no one is talking about war, use the tools you have available. >> just remember as i said before, this is intentional conduct by the president. it was the president who chose to sign six executive orders on inauguration day -- excuse me, eight. in six of them had to do with this border issue, not building the wall, decriminalizing -- not deporting illegals who have committed crimes. he's the one that signed the executive order on the keystone pipeline. they are the ones that went forward with this crazy spending after they've been warned that when you put too much money in the economy chasing the same amount of goods you will create inflation. so i put it more in the category of intentional conduct. this is what they want to do. they've got a big mess on their hands. they think their problem is they don't communicate correctly about this stuff, not actually the stuff they are doing and this is why they will pay a huge price at the ballot box because what they're doing is what the american people aren't buying. >> sean: going to give you the last word and may be as part of your last word, the top three or four things you would recommend they need to do immediately to get their polling back in line? >> you should immediately walk away from build back better. he wants to be a moderate, he should work on something bipartisan and take it in very small nuggets but he can't do it because he is too deeply in debt now to the woke. he began his presidency appealing to them, he can't cut and run from his base now. he is trapped with his base. harris is the anchor around biden and progressives are the anchor around biden as well. they are trapped. >> sean: great analysis. thank you both. breaking earlier today, senator joe manchin spoke with president biden on the phone about his build back better green deal socialism deal. he votes no, this insane spending plan will be dead. tonight, there are 5 trillion reasons for joe manchin to walk away from this bill. according to the bipartisan gold standard, congressional budget office nonpartisan budget office, build back better actually when you get rid of all the accounting gimmicks and you get rid of all the sunset clauses that are ridiculous if you include them actually cost $5.1 trillion with interest and that adds $3 trillion to the deficit. democrats have been lying to you trying to mask the true cost by pretending the programs in this bill will just magically and in year three, five, whatever. politicians lie, the cbo does not. according to all the democrats are the gold standard at least according to every top democrat in office. take a look and remind you of what they think about cbo. >> the estimate from the cbo which is the gold standard, no republican or democrat questions. >> some of them are trying to pin a rose on this report and make it sound like it's a good thing and others are trying to discredit the cbo but it's completely wrong. >> before we enact major legislation, we should know the truth. cbo speaks the truth. they've been speaking the truth for decades. and to try to attack cbo is simply attacking the messenger. >> the cbo nonpartisan fact-based score shows what a horror show this republican plan is. >> we're going to beat stopping at cold and certainly the cbo information gives us a big boost. >> sean: now that the math isn't working for them, they are trashing the cbo. actually said they are outdated because they don't count the well-being of the planet. how do you calculate that? and jen psaki calling the cbo analysis faked taking a cheap shot at senator lindsey graham who insisted on real numbers and no accounting gimmicks. take a look. >> the president says build back better is not going to add a penny to the deficit. they assume social programs are going to be made permanent and in that case it would add almost $3 trillion does that mean president biden will commit to these programs are not going to be made permanent? >> first of all, what you're talking about here is a fake cbo score if that is not based on the actual bill that anybody is voting on. this is a ask request by senator graham to score a bill that is not currently being debated but it's important to understand when anyone raises a question about this new cbo score, it is a fake score about a bill that doesn't exist and we should really focus on the actual bill everyone is going to vote on and considering in congress right now. >> sean: jen psaki is lying as per usual. the true cost of build back better socialism is monumental, not fully paid for it. we've been lied to, not even close and according to two of barack obama's top economic advisors, this bill would cause inflation to spike even more. lindsey graham said it's like pouring gasoline on it. joining us now, south carolina senator lindsey graham. first of all, i was mad at you over the infrastructure bill, i'm not as mad as i was, so we don't always agree but you rightly demanded no accounting gimmicks, you rightly demanded it be scored accurately, the democrats always said the cbo is the gold standard and when you get to the real numbers, 5.1 trillion, 3 trillion to the deficit. we been lied to the whole time. >> so what did i do? i asked the cbo to look at the bill to see if it had budget gimmicks and that's what joe manchin asked in november last month and what did cbo tell us? if the 17 program stay in place and will never go away, it's not 1.75. you spend that much money over ten years the way the bill was constructed, the deficit goes from 360 billion to 3 trillion. so it's alive. so what she said about me is a lie. the bill on the floor is a lie. the bill on the floor and set up to because 1.75 trillion based on a lie. it's a lie that these programs will go away. you tell the truth about the bill like cbo did, it's 5 trillion, not 1.75, 3 trillion deficit. i don't know what joe manchin is going to do. the biggest game in town right now is what will joe manchin do? i can tell you what he said. he said he would not vote for a bill that was part of a shell game full of budget gimmicks, the cbo said this is a budget gimmick bill. he said he would not vote for a bill that added to the deficit. this bill adds $3 trillion to the deficit. he said he wouldn't vote for a bill that would make inflation worse. this bill will pour gasoline on the inflation fire. using his own words, he should vote against this bill. >> sean: so america's hopes to be back this new green deal radical build back better socialism hangs in the balance with one of vote, one man, one person? our only hope they are -- i have a good relationship with joe manchin. i think he really cares about the people of west virginia but it's all -- he holds all the cards here? >> 100%. every republican will vote against build back better and that's quite a feat. the republican party can't unite itself but the democratic party has been able to do something we can't do. build back better has united every republican, all of us will vote against it because it's a nightmare for the country. it will lead to inflation, it's full of budget gimmicks and his $3 trillion unpaid for so every republican vote and if joe manchin listens to the good people of west virginia, he will vote no. this bill, the green new deal components will make gas prices go way up. they've gone up 58% since biden has been president. the build back better will -- if you want this bill to pass and be paid for, show me how you come up with $3 trillion of tax increases for government cuts. it can't be done, it should be shelved or rewritten. >> sean: have you talked to joe manchin and how certain are you all republican stay united? >> i've never been more certain of anything in my life. susan collins, rand paul, ted cruz, lindsey graham, fill-in the blank, mitch mcconnell, we are all going to vote no. the first person i told about the score was joe manchin and he was stunned that the cbo had the bill more costly than went from 360 billion over ten years to $3 trillion in deficit. again, if joe will do what he said he would do in terms of evaluating this bill, make sure it doesn't add to inflation, make sure it's paid for, make sure he doesn't have any gimmicks, he will vote no because it's based on his own standard. the cbo destroyed his ability to vote yes. >> sean: we are going to watch. why did the republicans help and assist in a one-time role, can you explain that to me? i've got to tell you something, the republican party under mitch mcconnell promise not to do it in september. then at the last minute, they aided and abetted the democrats who bought them more time. now they did at a different way but a one-time rule is just another way to buy the more time. republicans have been kept out of the budgetary process the entire time. why and what are the implications? less than a minute. >> i think people are worried about -- we had a good plan, make them raise the debt ceiling using reconciliation, same mechanism used to spend all this money. that was a good idea. what we wound up doing was a mistake allowing the house to change the senate rules but here's the good news. all of us are on board against build back better. i hope joe manchin will vote against build back better. >> sean: joe manchin, the world awaits your decision. a lot of pressure on one guy. i think i agree with you if he stands up for the people of west virginia, it's a no-brainer. good people. the left rush to politicize the deadly tornadoes in kentucky this weekend. it was shameless and oconee and covert mandates are coming back and blue states. mark meadows in an exclusive interview will join us live as a january 6th committee with a predetermined outcome recommended to charge him with contempt. stay with us as we continue. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list event. >> sean: democrats tonight hitting new lows actually using the deadly tornado tragedy across the midwest to push their far left climate alarmism agenda despite little facts and any evidence suggesting the extreme weather was directly tied to man-made climate change. just listen to biden's far left him a director. >> this is going to be our new normal and the effects we are seeing from climate change are of the crisis of our generation. we are taking a lot of efforts at fema to work with communities to help reduce the impacts that we are seeing from the severe weather events and help to develop systemwide projects like and help protect communities. >> sean: the panic inducing climate doom didn't stop there as joe biden himself claiming without citing any hard evidence that the storms are a direct consequence of warming but what does that actual science hearsay? follow the science, that's the mantra. what are the actual facts? for example, the 2021 climate report finds data on tornadoes and climate change is inconclusive. "attribution of certain classes of extreme weather like tornadoes is beyond current modeling and theoretical capabilities. but of course, that does not stop the democrats in the middle of pushing their new green deal socialism from rushing to politicize a tragedy. and the fueling of course more hysteria, speculation about naturally occurring weather events, climate change is a religion and the cult of the radical left. for example, failed far left congressman eric swalwell tweeted in part "do not for one second forget that rand paul has voted against helping most americans most times that they are in need. democrats can never let a crisis go to waste. rahm emanuel said that. even in the immediate aftermath of a really horrific tragedy. here to break it all down, author of the book the weaponization of whether in the phony climate war become a meteorologist and of course founder of whether bell.com. you know what i love about you is whether is your passion, one of these crazy storm chasers, everyone is running away from tornadoes and hurricanes and you're moving right into them but you have encyclopedic knowledge if i ask you about the hurricane season in the 1920s, i bet you could tell me the name of every hurricane, how bad it was, what category it was, et cetera, et cetera, my correct on that? >> i could tell you where they went, but they didn't have names back then. >> sean: of course, i stand corrected and embarrassed on my own show. thank you. but you could tell me was in a category three, four, five, what the damage was, correct? >> that's right. because if you understand the past, you have a foundation to reach for the future and erasing the past to pretending things didn't occur like for instance the 1925 tri-state tornado which this tornado may have actually been as bad or worse than that but it's 96 years later and for the fema director to say what she said is about as extremely wrong has i've ever seen unless she is forecasting this to come back every year, this is the new normal, it's the 96 return rate. so that's the fact, here's the other fact. as they've said nothing about severe weather this particular whether the season because there hasn't been much going on. the combination of wind damage and hill reports is near record lows but that's what they do and why i call it weaponization. of they wait for something to happen. the next big thing is going to be lookout, europe and vladimir putin, i'm sure his meteorologist is laughing and smiling right now, severe and bitter cold is going to set into europe much of late december and january. we are also watching what's going on in alaska because that looks like it's bound for the united states. when you put together the energy situation, supply line situation in this country, another that has been engineered will then be blamed just like this particular situation is blamed on climate change. >> sean: and the '70s, saying the next ice age is coming on the cover of "newsweek." so there is a natural ebb and flow historically that you can trace and would you argue that the u.n. is correct, the science cannot determine at this point whether or not man-made anything had to do anything to these tornadoes? i have ten seconds. >> given their stated wow stated agenda, that is remarkably objective on their part and that's exactly right, strong tour tornadoes have been decreasing over the past 20 to 30 years, there's a reason for that, we can't get into that right now but for this particular year in general, this has stood out just like what you may see later this week in the philippines, a super typhoon hit is standing out because they have had near record low typhoon activity in the western pacific but that's what they do, it's almost like snakes in the grass, way to attack. >> sean: thank you. our prayers are with all the people impacted by this, it is devastating, lives are uprooted and lost, prayers are with all of you and it is sad that people would use even a weather event to advance an agenda, pretty pathetic without science behind it, the very people that lecture us to follow the signs. now the democrats never ending covid restrictions, the pandemic theater is showing no signs of slowing down. also tonight here in new york, a statewide vaccinate were a mask rule for going indoors went into effect today. california is going several steps further as the failed far left state is re-implementing a universal indoor mask mandate starting on wednesday. and that's not all, anyone unvaccinated who wants to attend a mega event must show proof of a negative test a day before the event. we are also learning tonight the u.s. air force has now administratively discharged 27 members for refusing the covid-19 vaccine believed to be the first members removed over the mandate. here with reaction, cohost of the clay travis and buck sexton show, clay travis. i could add that in new york even though the science, the cdc web site shows parity, the number of kids between ages five and 11 that have died from covid. it's on par with how many children we will lose every year from the flu. so it's very consistent. younger people are not being impacted but in new york city, they will now force children to show a vaccine card to get into a restaurant or store. thoughts? >> absolute madness. i have a 7-year-old, i have an 11-year-old. one of the most fortunate things over the past couple of years is kids have mercifully been spared. they are more likely to die of the seasonal flu but not just that, they are more likely to drown and die in a traffic accident than they are from covid and all of this is madness. jen psaki actually came out and defended the idea of young kids having to eat outside in the bitter cold sometimes sitting in socially distanced areas outdoors when there's absolutely no science to support this at all. and this is also a big point, talking about big events going on in new york and the restrictions in california as well for big events, you know what dr. fauci said about southeastern conference football? he said when college football started that covid was going to feast on all of the fans that were going to the tailgate, going to games, crowding into bars and restaurants. you know what happened? the overall covid rate collapsed and now all of the states that have the highest rate of covid voted for joe biden, blue states. all of these restrictions, masks, social distancing, the ideas that kids need to be vaccinated or not supported by science and it is the antithesis of science and the party of science like they claim to be is totally full of it. it's a joke. >> sean: they also said if we had football, it would be a disaster, everyone would be a super spreader event, that did not become the case. not at all, that's right. good point. they are wrong again. thank you. it also tonight, more antics from the democrat sham january 6 committee. we've been telling you this is a waste of your time and money. they have a predetermined outcome and by the way, it lacks any serious investigation and breaking tonight, the committee voted to send out criminal contempt of congress resolution to the house for former white house chief of staff mark meadows for failing to comply with a sham subpoena, documents he says are protected by executive privilege. that would need to be played out in courts. we are now learning about an email from the former chief of staff that said the national guard was on standby to protect "pro-trump people" and president trump requested increased national guard on the days leading up to january 6. including request by the capitol police chief. here with reaction, i read the book cover to cover, you've got to get a copy. it's an insider view that actually is fair to donald trump, what a rarity. chief of staff mark meadows. first i will get your reaction to the january 6 vote 9-0 that it will now go before the house but we already know this is a predetermined outcome. didn't we learn that when they kicked jim jordan and jim banks off the committee? >> we did. obviously it's disappointing, but not surprising and let's be clear about this, this is not about me, holding me in contempt. it's not even about making the capital safer. we've seen that by the selective leaks that are going on right now. this is about donald trump and about actually going after him once again continuing to go after donald trump and when we look at the real results of this investigation, it is not really -- the foundation is not based on legislative purpose. >> sean: i am looking at the interpretation of this by his committee, liz cheney and company. love how she has partnered with the people that called her father wrote a war criminal and a quick, amazing. and i'm looking at this committee and they are acting as though it is nefarious. you have massive crowds coming to washington, we just came out of the summer of 2020 not investigating the 500 riots that killed thousands of americans, hurt thousands of cops, caused billions of property damage, liz cheney and company have no interest in those riots, i condemn them all equally on this program. but what i want to know is as if it's a bad thing after coming out of the summer of 2020 saying okay there might be troublemakers here, we need to protect the capital. you asked for it before the rally on january 6, the president asked for it, the capitol police chief asked for it and we now have reports of whistle-blowers telling us is national guard members they were told to stand down when they wanted to go in and stop the trouble. i don't hear them talking about that part. >> they want to talk about the part that fits their narrative and what we do know that in one of the things that is coming out more and more clearly each and every day as everyone condemned what happened in terms of the breach of security on january 6th but what we also know is that president trump wanted to make sure that the people that came that there was a safe environment for that kind of assembly and i've said that publicly before, the 10,000 national guard troops that he wanted to make sure that everything was safe and secure and the way that some of the democrats are spinning this trying to spend some nefarious purpose i think at the end of the day, they are going to find that not only did the president act, but he acted quickly and in doing all of that, it's important with this contempt vote that is coming out tomorrow, a very high probability that they will refer me for criminal contempt to doj. >> sean: what will you do? >> at this point, it will be turned over to the hands of doj. i can say that when you look at the criminal component of the intent, there's never been an intent on my part. i have tried to share nonprivileged information but truly, the executive privilege that donald trump has claimed is not mine to waiver congresses to wave and that's why we filed the lawsuit to hopefully get the courts to weigh in, hopefully they will weigh in. >> sean: before they did this to steve bannon, the last time they had done this was 1983. i notice they haven't been focused on president trump's actual words on the rally that day. many will now peacefully and patriotically marched the capital so your voices may be heard. i didn't hear it any of that, many of you will march peacefully, not peacefully enough patriotically and invade the capital. the fact that they are ignoring your request, they are ignoring the capitol police chief's request earlier for support from the national guard which is especially after the summer of 2020 is just good common sense, smart policing. >> obviously, having those national guards available, the reason they were able to respond when they did was because president trump had actually put them on order. but i would also want to comment on one other thing. we look at senior officials, chiefs of staff compelling them to come in and testify and what we are seeing now, there's lots of jurisprudence and legal opinions and the law that would suggest that that's not something that should be in the purview of congress so hopefully. >> sean: i've got a question. i said that day and i've said it now and i mean it, we are a country of law and order. we have to be. with that said my want to get to the bottom of it, i want to know why the guard was told to stand down, one. i want to know why your request, why president trump's request for the guard knowing what happened in the summer of 2020 was denied and i would like an answer to why we had 500 riots in the summer of 2020, dozens of americans dead, thousands of cops injured, billions of dollars of property damage, arson and looting, where's that committee? i'd like to see that committee. >> that committee is not there and there is a political narrative that really focuses on donald trump is a 45th president of the united states and sadly when we look at what is to be accomplished i'm not sure that this committee is set up to do that. >> sean: we appreciate it and we will watch this very closely and coming up, biden's failed policies have created a labor shortage and stores are beginning to reduce their hours as a result. dirty jobs host mike rowe is up next as we continue. >> sean: just like we've been reporting tonight, the biden agenda is failing and it is taking more americans out of the labor force. it is harming businesses, putting the country on the path to more entitlements, more government dependency and more inflation now at a 39 year high. as someone who knows the value of hard work as well as anyone, the host of the new show dirty jobs premieres january 2nd and even has a new video called santa got a dirty job. take a look. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ santa claus never slows down ♪ ♪ he's got to keep on pushing those reindeer hard if he's going to hit every town ♪ ♪ 24 hours straight ♪ ♪ got to out run them big guard dogs ♪ ♪ got to do whatever it takes ♪ ♪ don't you know santa claus got a dirty job ♪ ♪ santa claus got a dirty job ♪ ♪ santa claus got a dirty job ♪ ♪ and he does it all night long ♪♪ >> sean: joining us now, the one and only mike rowe. why are you picking on santa claus like that, what's up with that? >> he's my hero, man. he's going down chimneys, reindeer kicking mud in his face, works all night long, got to give the guy a break. we wrote a song just because we felt like it and we had time and we wanted to raise some money for our foundations and last week, it was the number one downloaded song in the world so santa claus coming in clutch. >> sean: as i go over this and i'm looking at it, maybe it's just the way i was raised and maybe it's why i like the two shows. you're the only person that worked on shows that i would like to do except for my own shows and that is the dirty job show that you did which is phenomenal, don't know how you did some of those jobs. and deadliest catch, i love that show when i can watch it for hours on end. and the reality is if you have to get up in the morning and you have nothing to do, i don't think i can think of anything worse. >> than not working. we have a problem in the country and honestly it in my view, it's not really a political problem. it's a human problem. he give the average person, i don't care if he is a republican or democrat, the average person a chance to work and make 700 bucks a week or not work and make 700 bucks a week, most people are going to take the easy way. it is just the way we are wired. so when we talk about these policies and when you talk about incentivizing the kind of behavior that we want to encourage an dis- incentivize the kind of behavior that we want to discourage, it seems like a fairly sensible thing to do but the truth is you can't mandate work ethic. you can't just wave a magic wand at somebody and say they are, character or delayed gratification or at these and attitude or personal responsibility. those things have to be taught. they are choices. my foundation works hard to make a persuasive case for those choices but you are right, some policies get in the way, some policies don't. it's interesting to see how that all plays out. >> sean: when you did the dirtiest jobs, what was the worst of the worst? >> they were 300 of them. a couple coming up this season that of her right up there but i think getting a ruptured lip pump out of the wastewater treatment plant, it's all for ton motor and a five-story silo and when it ruptures, you've got to dog paddle through the filth and they winched the whole thing out with a big crane and with that lift pump breaks the seal that had been holding it to the floor, that sound will haunt your dreams. >> sean: i watched you in one episode and i couldn't do this job because you call in this little crawl space, had to call all the way in and then you're scooping out hunks of grease and grime and muck and you've got to do it all day, i could not have done that job, but you did. we have 20 seconds. >> you're sitting there every day doing your job. we all show up whether you're santa claus or a newscaster or a guy on tv, doesn't matter. some people show up early, some people stay late. those of the people we celebrate. >> sean: i don't know anyone that works an eight hour day, nobody. more "hannity" right after this. [upbeat acoustic music throughout] are you taking a statin drug to reduce cholesterol? it can also deplete your coq10 levels. i recommend considering qunol coq10 along with your statin medication. the brand i trust is qunol. ♪ ♪ >> sean: unfortunately that's all the time we have for tonight, as always we thank you for being with us. you make the show possible. we hope you will set your dvr so you never miss an episode. in the meantime, let not your hearts be troubled. laura ingraham, "the ingraham angle" starts right here, right now, and it's a great show. >> laura: do you have blue on blue tonight? is that a light blue on a light blue? i can't really tell, it's very pastel-like. >> sean: it's blue on blue, i just checked. >> laura: it's very icy. >> sean: guess how much thought to get that? none. >> laura: my next guest has the same outfit as you because you have jeans on. i'm revealing my next guest's pants. >> sean: i have sweat sweat pants on, do you want me to be honest? i have michigan sweatpants. >> laura: are you wearing crocs too? great, hannity, i'm taking your fashion of ice. great to see you. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle" from washington