countries that have due process something they are now telling success an ugly relic of institutional racism. when unpopular people seem guilty, you just go ahead and punish them, that's the new rule. years ago we called this lynching, now we call it equity. cnn's chief legal correspondent a princeton graduate called laura coats explained this morning on twitter quote the defense begins the closing by defining reasonable doubt not with why derek chauvin is innocent, she wrote. think about that. as it happens we have thought about it. we have thought about it because that is the entire principle of our entire justice system in the united states you are not required to prove your innocence that's china. in the united states the government has to prove your guilt. and if they can't proof your guilt, they have to let you go that's the american system, there is no other system that you would want to live under. with you then you're not congresswoman maxine waters of los angeles. waters has never believed in western justice. for decades she supported the totalitarian government of cuba which replaced jury trials with summary mass executions murdering entire groups of people that was fine with maxine waters. she has never had a problem with killing political enemies. waters is now among the most powerful democrats in congress over the weekend she traveled to indianapolis make sure the mob understood the marching orders. >> we have got to fight for justice. i am very hopeful and i hope that we are going to get a verdict that will say guilty, guilty, guilty. i don't know whether it's in the first degree but as far as i'm concerned it's first degree. we have got to stay on the streets and we have got to get more active. we have got to get more confrontational. we have got to make sure that they know that they know we mean business. >> tucker: we have got to make sure that they know we mean business, she said. well, that couldn't be clearer. do what we say or we will kill you. that's the message. marks seen waters doesn't have much use for those anglo-saxon civic traditions like jury trials. her demand was very clear. convict officer derek chauvin of first degree or we will burn it down. no one asked the question is chauvin actually guilty of first degree murder. and the answer is, you may believe he committed a crime and he may have. but no honest person who has watched the trial will tell you is he guilty of first degree murder. saying that or claiming that is not racial based on the last election or. no jury would convict jury of first degree murder. again, maxine waters doesn't believe in the system, the one that she helps run so she is demanding a first degree murder conviction. what is this called? it's called jury intimidation. inside the courtroom, hennepin county judge got that will message. he is not a right winger he once worked for amy klobuchar. but he knows a threat when he sees one. >> i'm aware of the media reports. i'm aware that congresswoman waters was talking specifically about this trial and about the unacceptability of anything less than a murder conviction. and talked about being confrontational. but you can submit the press articles about that. this goes back to what i have been saying from the beginning i wish elected officials would stop talking about this case especially in a measure that is disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch and our function. i think if they want to give their opinions, they should do so in a respectful and in a person that is consistent with their oath to the constitution. to respect a coequal branch of government. their failure to do so, i think, is abhorrent. >> tucker: so maxine waters did not speak in a vacuum. and judge cahill wasn't the only person who heard what she said. just hours after maxine waters called for violence, someone tried to murder two national guardsmen in minneapolis in a drive by shooting. until just recently people bragged about the gentle niceness of minnesota. not anymore. watch this clip from the police chief of minneapolis suburb as he describes how his officers were attacked by biden voters who had been egged on by demagogue. >> i was front and center at the protest, at the riot. we did not. >> it was -- don't do that. >> no riot. >> it was. so, i was -- we were being the officers that were putting themselves in harm's way were being pelted with frozen cans of pop. they were being pelted with concrete blocks. >> tucker: so that was the context. that was the scene in minnesota before maxine waters showed up to demand more violence. here's what it looked like. [explosion] [shouting] [explosion] [shouting] other side of the street. >> my procedure and my sister and i will go. >> tucker: so once more, for the second time in less than a year, blm is burning the state of minnesota. now, maxine waters knew that when she showed up. and that's why, according to documents obtained by town hall, she demanded government body guards on her way to minneapolis. police escort in and out reads her request. it's almost hard to process facts like these. calling for violence even as you demand that taxpayers protect you from the violence you are calling for. whipping a dangerous mob into a frenzy at the very same moment you are trying to eliminate the police and then disarm the population through gun control, what is that? well, it's totalitarian and we should be honest about it. too often republicans waste time highlighting the hypocrisy of the left. is blm more dangerous than the fake insurrectionist who showed up at the capitol on january 6th? well, yeah, obviously. is maxine waters -- guilty of greater incitement than donald trump? well, of course. but that's not the point. people like maxine waters don't care if you point out that they are hypocrites. they don't care if you can catch them lying you are wasting your breath if you point this out. they are not ashamed. they never will be ashamed. how do you respond to people like this? well, the only thing you can do is tell the truth about who they are. maxine waters is someone who supports mob violence. she always has supported it. we have known that. almost 30 years ago when race riots leveled huge parts of los angeles maxine waters cheered them on. people want to know why i'm not saying exactly what they want me to say she said at the time. they want me to walk out and, walk like black people did in the '60s and say cool it baby cool it i'm sorry. riot is the voice of the unheard. it was quite a riot. 50 people were killed during those riots in 1992. many more were seriously injured. one of those most seriously injured was a man called reginald denny he was beaten nearly to death he was left with permanent brain damage. why? because he looked the wrong way. he had the wrong color. a mob pulled him out of his truck and smashed his scwul a cinder block it happened on camera. if you haven't seen it, here it is. >> the one image that i will never get over. it will go to my grave, with me, and that's the image of reginald denny being pulled out of his truck and being beaten mercilessly. >> denny would undergo multiple surgeries to repair the extensive damage to his face. >> tucker: how could you watch that and not feel sick? no normal person okay but maxine waters defended the men who did that. the ringleader of the mob who pulled reginald denny out of his truck was a man called damion williams. the day that the jury was set to deliver a verdict in the williams case, maxine waters visited damion williams' home and offered her support. quote: we have an opportunity for justice to prevail, waters said. in the end, williams served only a short part of his sentence. was released from prison and then what do you think happened he? went on to murder someone else. waters has paid no price for this. she kept rising in the democratic hierarchy. no one told her to stop inciting violence naturally she did. few years ago she called on mobs to attack trump supporters. >> and if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. [cheers] >> and you push back on them and you tell them they are not welcome. >> tucker: these aren't aberrations. this is a decades long theme. what do we conclude from it? the obvious, max seep waters doesn't believe in the western understanding of justice or self-government. she believes in mob violence for political end. that's why she has been calling for it for decades. how has the democratic party responded to this they have rewarded her for it. maxine waters is the chairman of one of the most powerful committees in the congress house financial services. she oversees wall street. that was her reward. tonight you are hearing for republicans to call for her to lose her chairmanship or expel from congress. those are worthy goals. let's not lie to ourselves. that's not going to happen. leading democrats are not going to punish maxine waters because they are not embarrassed of maxine waters they agree with max seen waters. that cnn reporter asked maxine waters today if maxine waters should apologize for what she said for whipping the mob into violence. no pelosi said quote, maxine talks about confrontation in the manner of the civil rights movement. what an insult by the way for the actual civil rights movement. then she was asked if maxine waters' comments incited violence and pelosi said this, quote. no, absolutely not. so in the fails of that grotesque display, silence from the democratic party's usual moral chorus. the lincoln project tells you so deeply cares about democracy is not running ads against maxine waters, obviously. david frum hasn't scolded her in the that atlantic he is not going. to say "the washington post" doesn't seem to care. why is that? why aren't they saying anything? obviously they support maxine waters. they think her calls for violence are justified or at least they are afraid to say otherwise which is a distinction without a difference. this is true. and the super we understand it the better. here's a clip from a show called "burn it down" with tim brown. can you get it on itunes. can you watch it on any number of social media platforms none of which is even considered censoring it. as you watch ask yourself how much influence should someone have over the country where your family lives? >> for the record, i support all that [bleep], i support them looting the damn dollar tree. i support the looting of what [bleep] they loot like the advanced auto parts. i remember last year they looted target. i support all that [bleep]. loot all that [bleep]. do you know why? because black people and marginnized and oppressed people could loot over store for this whole country 200 years would not come close to the debt that america owes us [bleep] stand up because really that's the language. that's the only language this country understands. >> tucker: tear it up she says. burn it down. so how are people in charge responding to this? well, we are pretty surety fbi isn't at kim brown's house tonight. cold front "60 minutes" isn't planning hit piece on her. those are reserved for florida's governors. in america's many numerous she is not considered a threat. she considered ally. who is the threat? it's people who didn't vote for joe biden. they must be hounded into submission by the american news media. here's the latest example a few days ago an abc reporter in utah brought a tv camera to the home of a paramedic. just a paramedic. not anyone with power. a guy who helps injured people. the tv crew showed up because this paramedic had made the mistake of donating $10 to kyle rittenhouse deal defense fund. the website was hacked and his donation the paramedic's donation became public. so abc local in utah decided to destroy the paramedic's life and put his family in peril. he stepped out of line. that's not aloud. no one outside of utah seemed to notice this. just as no one outside of still water minnesota seemed to notice in a mob showed up at the home of the county attorney there the mob demanded more charges filed in the case of that cop who accidentally shot someone last week. they didn't petition the court to get new charges. they went right to physical threats. that used to be very rare in this country when it happened we clamped down on it hard. but no one is clamping down on it so, of course, it's happening more often. this weekend another mob came to the home of what they thought belonged to one of the witnesses in derek chauvin's defense. they smeared pig blood all over the house. what do you call that? tell it's textbook. it's witness intimidation. fighting things like that witness intimidation is precisely why we have a civil rights division at the justice department to protect people's civil rights. especially the right to speak freely at criminal trials. that's what due process is. where was joe biden's doj today? swarming the scene to protect the civil rights of everyone involved? to protect the legal system itself? no. sorry. they were too busy rounding up more elderly poor people who made the mistake of stepping inside the capitol on january 6th. so let's stop lying to ourselves about what's happening here. it's very obvious. grady judd is the sheriff of polk county florida he joins us tonight. sheriff, thanks so much for coming on. you enforce the law for a living. when violent mobs of civilians demand punishment for people outside of our legal system, what happens to the country? >> >> well, it breaks down the entire system. you know, we are a democracy because of our rule of law. and the republic fails to exist if we don't respect that republic and that law. and it's the beginning of the break down of the entire system, tucker. >> tucker: so, i mean, if your job -- and i assume if you know you work for the government at any level, local, state, federal, your job by definition is to preserve the system that we all, i thought, believed in. how do you -- if a mob shows up at a witness's house and smears pig blood on it, do you ignore that? >> not in the state of florida we don't. we lock them up. we put them in jail. there are specific laws against that. trespassing, intimidating the witness, interfering in the trial. it is offensive to me as an american to think that anyone could do that and get away with it. i guarantee you that won't happen in the state of florida. and it won't happen in this county. they will go to jail before quit. >> tucker: i believe you and that's one of the reasons some people are moving to florida right now. i have to ask. we have seen situations like this fairly frequently in the american history. we saw them in the 1950s and 1960s where municipalities decided they were going to ignore the law. so the feds got involved and said i'm sorry, it's america. you can't violate people's civil rights. we're not going to allow it if you have to send the 101st airborne. we are not going to allow that the biden administration is doing absolutely nothing. what do you make of that. >> well, certainly i hope that the attorney general garland recognizes and upholds his oath to have constitution. we all take an oath to support the constitution and individual rights of every one. people have a right to protest. they have a right to be angry with the government. they don't have a right to be violent. they don't have a right to attack government officials. they don't have a right to interfere in trials when people are trying to get a fair trial in the united states of america. we protect that right in the state of florida governor desantis is very strong. we are very strong. we do what's right in florida all the time. that's guarantee. >> tucker: i don't think i have heard it more clearly put than that sheriff grady judd of polk county, florida, i appreciate your coming on tonight. >> glad to be with you, tucker. >> tucker: you just heard the name of the florida governor which has been in the news quite a bit. people are saying he may have political ambitions beyond the state. certainly an interesting person and certainly doing something that is drawing many thousands of people to his state. they are voting with their feet. we had a long interview with governor desantis. we will show you part of it after the break. ♪ ♪ my retirement plan with voya keeps me moving forward... even after paying for this. love you, sweetheart they guide me with achievable steps that give me confidence. this is my granddaughter...she's cute like her grandpa. voya doesn't just help me get to retirement... ...they're with me all the way through it. come on, grandpa! later. got grandpa things to do. aw, grandpas are the best! well planned. well invested. well protected. voya. be confident to and through retirement. which shows will you be getting into tonight? how about all of 'em. netflix. cuz xfinity gets you really into your shows. when someone burns for someone who does not feel the same. oh, daphne. let's switch. from live tv to sports on the go. felix at the finish! you can even watch your dvr from anywhere. okay, that's just showing off. you get all of this with x1. so go on, get really into your shows. you need a breath mint. xfinity. it's a way better way to watch. ♪ >> tucker: it was just a few years ago florida seemed like the praise for retirees and drunk college kids on spring break. you wake up one morning and all of a sudden it's the hope of the nation it's the free state. how did that happen? probably a lot of reasons but ron desantis being governor is one of them. we wanted to sit down with a long conversation with him and we did. it's an episode on our new show "tucker carlson today" it came out this afternoon on fox nation. here's part of it. >> so, you went to harvard, you went to yale. of you were naval officer, you served in congress for six years. you certainly have been around a lot of elite institutions. you ignored them as they criticized you. >> of course, yes. >> tucker: why? >> well, first of all, when i first went to yale, i grew up in florida i was a blue collar kid. i showed up my first day in jean shorts and t-shirt because that's what we wore on the west close coast of florida was a major culture shock. that was not something that was received very warmly. and i never quite fit in there. and it was total culture shock to me. and i really rebelled against the leftist orthodoxy that i saw on that campus. and then when i see those in other institutions and so i have always had a really strong distrust of some of the elites in american society. because i think they have gotten a lot of things wrong over the years. so that was actually natural. i don't seek the approval of elites. i got elected by people here in florida. those are the folks that i was elected to serve. i don't really care what people in the beltway or new york city think about what we are doing in florida. >> tucker: it's interesting though because people who you see it a lot, people who come from some little town out in the provinces and they show up in a place like yale or harvard law school or become a naval officer which i think is maybe not different. it is an elite institution and they decide, you know, this is the world that i really love. these are the values that i believe. it sounds like you came away from your experience as more contemptuous. >> and appreciate united states where i came from quite frankly. i remember going to yale sitting in class. i had never heard anybody criticize america like everything was about how bad america was. i never heard -- i would go to church i never heard anyone criticize god or christianity and it was all -- yale's motto for god for country for yale. they hated god and the country and obviously had a weird way about going to their institution. seeing that was really eye-opening. and i realized very early on this is not quite where i permanently fit in. >> tucker: were the people impressive? >> it's interesting -- >> tucker: very hard to get into those schools. >> here what happens i would say. there are people who that are smart for sure. if you think you are smarter than you are, you got some problems. even if you are really smart, and i think what i saw was people who were smart but tended to think they were a lot smarter and knew a lot more than they really did. and i think that there is a lot of danger in that. i kind of learned early on you have got to have a little bit of humility, you know, you want to be confident in what you believe and what you think, but, there is always more information out there and be careful of getting over your success. -- skis thatserved me well. >> tucker: how important do you think thats is the fact that there wasn't widespread rioting in the state to people's decision to move here? you have seen a lot of people move here. >> it's definitely been a factor for sure. i think the fact that florida wasn't locked down like these other states. i think the lockdowns, you know, provided an impetus because people need an outlet to do things. some of these states like minnesota, california i think the fact that they were locked down had the opportunity to go out and do stuff, i think that that added fuel to the fire of what was going on. i think the fact that we took a hard line on that. people understood florida is a law and order state but also that we were open i think has been a huge factor in people moving to florida. >> tucker: so what -- obviously you have had a lot of successes, you are a very famous governor. what didn't go according to plan? how did you screw up in retrospect? >> i think early on, you know, i was just hungry for data. so i was looking at south korea, italy, and i'm trying to make sense of this virus it seemed to me that this was something that was risky for elderly people. >> tucker: yeah. >> didn't seem like this was much risk for people not just kids but even people who were in reasonably good health who were, say, under 50. but i didn't have the proof of that in florida. so when they did the 15 days to slow the spread and some of that stuff, we followed that. whereas i think if i had had more data i would have had the ability to say wait a minute, you know, why would we need to close a gym for two weeks? i mean, these are younger people going to work out. if you are healthy, you are going to end up dealing with the virus better. so i think that it took me a few weeks, march and into april to get enough date to to say okay, you know, we're not doing fauciism, we are going to make sure our state is open. we are going to get the kids back into school and we will just focus our protection on elderly people. >> tucker: ron desantis is one of those people you get the feeling is going to be around for a while and under greater scrutiny we had a long conversation about him. "tucker carlson today." new episodes come out monday wednesday and friday. go to fox nation.com to get them. so, january 6th was the qanon insurrection and we have been hearing about it every kay since. we have heard repeatedly that protesters murdered capitol hill police officer brian sicknick. is that true? well, the d.c. medical examiner just released the official cause of death. it's amazing. glenn greenwald joins us for that straight ahead. ♪ >> tucker: on january 7th of this year the u.s. capitol police released a statement telling the country that one of their officers, a man called brian sicknick had just been murdered by rioters at the capitol. here is what it says united states capitol police officer brian sicknick passed away due to injuries sustained on deuteronomy. he was responding to the riots on wednesday, january 6th, 2021 at the u.s. capitol and injured while physically engaging with protesters. he returned to his division office and collapsed. end quote. now, we took that at face value. mostly because we didn't have a choice. congress has exempted the u.s. capitol police from the usual transparency laws. if a police department shoots somebody, they have to tell you the name of the officer, that's the law in most places. but congress exempted their own police force from that. they are also not subject to the freedom of information act foia. so, again, we had to take their word for it. they told us that rioters killed brian sicknick with a fire extinguisher. that's what the media said, watch. >> officer brian sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the hours' long attack. >> they beat a capitol police officer to death with a fire extinguisher. >> officer brian sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher touring the fight. >> he died at the age of 42 after he was bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher. >> tucker: over on msnbc a legal analyst familiar with the law suggested the president was liable for the murder of officer sicknick. >> here's the thing, it's a murder trial because brian sicknick was killed by that angry mob. in a court of law, you know, are there is this thing called the felony murder rule. i contend donald trump committed the felony of inciting an insurrection and, you know the legal consequences that flow from that is donald trump would be held criminally liable for any crimes for any crimes that resulted like the murder of brian sicknick. >> tucker: i contend okay lawyer boy. at some point you just want the facts. what happened? so now it's more than three months after the event and we finally have some facts. washington, d.c.'s chief medical examiner has announced that brian sicknick, in fact, died of natural causes. apparently officer sicknick according to the medical examiner suffered two strokes. an autopsy found no evidence that he suffered any internal or external injuries. so what did we learn from this? this is a very different story than the one we have been told. how far should we respond? glenn greenwald has written about this. we are happy to have him on. you can read his analysis. we hope you will. thank you for coming on. so what's your reaction to this fact? >> so, obviously, tucker, i have been on your show many times over the last five years analyzing media lies that completely fell apart and usually i think that happens because of just gross irresponsibility and recklessness like they just don't care if what they are say something true. >> tucker: right. >> they are saying to please the partisan responsibilities. i don't think that's true. i think they did care. they lied on purpose. i say that because it was vital to be able to claim that a pro-trump mob on january 6th murdered somebody because about that being true it would mean that all the people who died that day were pro-trump protesters. three of them died of natural causes, one of whom was shot by a capitol hill police. it's very difficult to depict this protested as this menacing insurrection if they actually killed nobody and they themselves were killed. he became so central to their narrative that they valor rised him the idea that he was killed by the pro tem mob made it into the official record of president trump's impeachment trial. someone wrote it down for joe biden to say this is how crucial it became and the whole time, tucker, there were so many reasons from the stop to know it was a lie. there were journalists like myself, i know you have been done segments who were saying there is no evidence for it. there is evidence to believe it wasn't true. the original autopsy found no blunt trauma. his family said that he called them that night to say that he was folgt totally fine. his mother said she thought he died of a stroke. this is what is so repulsive is they completely exploited this person, this young police officer who they obviously didn't care anything about. they saw him as a toy to exploit his death for purely political ends in ways that now we now know were a complete and utter lie. >> tucker: so there are moments in journalism when you find out even if you are acting in good faith that you were wrong. that there actually weren't weapons of mass destruction in walk, rets, et cetera. this is one of these moments they told us something that is proveably untrue. how do they respond to this new fact? >> they ignore it look, this is 48 hours after their entire two month long claim about russia paying bounties to the taliban to kill american soldiers completely fell apart, too and the government admitted there was very little evidence for it none of them went on the air or apologized or accounted for how they got it wrong and they are not going to do it here. because they train their audiences to want to be lied to. and their audiences don't want them to go and say we got this story wrong. they are just going to move on. they are going to ignore it and then they are going to wonder why nobody trusts them. and the last point i wanted to make quickly, tucker, these are the same people who are taking the lead and demanding that the internet be censored. that ordinary citizens be censored that they, ordinary citizens are dissemating disinformation. nobody spreads more disinformation than those media outlets and those people who you just showed in those video clips leading into this segment. >> tucker: that is so true. people who won't admit that they have been proven wrong are acting in bad faith is as simple as that. thank you for pointing that out. i invite varietied you on to talk about the slow march to war with russia. i hope you will come back. >> i'm happy to come back to talk about that any time. >> tucker: thank you. glenn greenwald, thank you, appreciate it. >> okay, tucker. >> tucker: so it seems like the forces of oppression are moving every side. every institution you grew up in are being corrupted. that's not entirely true. some people standing up and tell the truth in the face of what's happening. a few brave people. one of them is a father to private school in manhattan. we will tell you what he said. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: everyone is towering and afraid in the face what we are seeing now. not everyone there is good news. a father from a brotherly school. where. so richest people send their daughters it has long been a liberal place. over the past year, like so many schools in this country it has become cultish and totalitarian. a parent called andrew gutman finally said so. here is part of what he wrote, quote: our family recently made the decision not to reenroll our daughter at brearley for the 2021-'22 school year. she has been at brearley for seven years, beginning in kindergarten. in short we no longer believe that brearley's board of trustees have any of our children's best interests at heart it cannot be stated strongly enough the that brearley's obsession with race must stop. cowardly and appalling lack of leadership by appeasing anti-intellectual ill liberal mob and allowing the school to be captured by the same mob. i object to the view that i should be judged by the color of may skin. i cannot tolerate a school that not only judges my daughter by the color of their kin but encourages and instructs her to pre-judge others by theirs. every aspect of history every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race we are desseeing creating the legacy of dr. martin luther king jr. and utter live violating the movement for such civil right leaders believed fought and died. i object to the charge of systemic racism in our country and in our school. we have not had sis tell mic racism against blacks in this country since the civil rights in 1960s a period of more than 50 years. to say state otherwise is a flat out misrepresentation of our country's history and it adds no understanding to any of today's societal issues. if anything, longstanding and widespread policies such as affirmative action pointed precise in exactly the opposite direction. rarely by adopting critical race theory is ant indicating the abhorrent viewpoint that black americans should be regarded as helpless victims and inkabul of success regarding will of skills, talents and hard work. what brearley is teaching our children is precisely the true and correct definition of racism. i object to brearley's vacuous inappropriate, and fanatical use of the words equity, diversity and inclusiveness. if brearley's administration truly concerned about so-called equity at this time it would be discussing legacy, siblings and families with especially deep pockets. let's pause now and smile because that's so true. if the administration was genuinely serious about diversity, it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students and families to a single mindset most reminiscent of the chinese cultural revolution. instead the school would foster an environment of intellectual openness and freedom of thought and broorly really cared about inclusiveness, the school would return to the concepts incapsulated one brearley instead of teaching the extraordinarily divisive idea that there are only and always two groups in this country victims and oppressors. i object to the censorship of books that have been taught for generations because they contain dated language potentially offensive to the thin-skinned and hyper sensitive. something that's already happened in my daughter's fourth grade class. i object to the lowering of standards for the admission of student and for the hiring of teachers. i object to the erosion of rigger in class work and the escalation of grade inflation. our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than what we have now. nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its own history. the letter goes on like this. the entire thing is worth reading and it's worth sending to everyone you know. it is brilliant. why isn't this guy running the country? how did the school respond to the letter? the school didn't respond. brearley's head semiliterate called james freed dismissed it out of hand as quote deeply dismissive and harmful afternoon moved on without addressing a single one of andrew gutman's point shut up and send your 60 grand that was her response. have you got to wonder this is a scam obviously. but how much longer can this scam continue? the scam we pretend brearley is an impressive place and the rest of collegiates pick your school they are not impressive they are poisonous. how long will we pretend they are impressive? not much longer you have got to think. ♪ so in the name of diversity the federal government is now trying to ban words from the english language. the faa you should never use the term unmanned drone. never again. don't misgender raytheon property. that's not the wildest example. you can never make any of it we are not going to as we talk to tammy bruce. ♪ ♪ ♪ don't know where your strength is ♪ ♪ it's been so long ♪ ♪ you get a call from a friend to remind you ♪ ♪ that you're not alone ♪ ♪ then you know deep down inside ♪ ♪ it's gonna be all right ♪ ♪ all right ♪♪ speak to federal immigration authorities have just received new orders, no, they are not about securing the border. they are being told what words they can use to discuss what is happening at the border. trace gallagher is on the story for us. hi, trace. >> border patrol agents are now being asked to follow two sets of guidelines and here's why. the legal term for someone who crosses the u.s. border without permission is illegal alien. and federal judges have ruled that when ice agents and border agents file documents, illegal alien is the term. ice and cpd must refer to illegal aliens as undocumented noncitizens or undocumented individuals and the list goes on. aliens will now become noncitizens or migrants and unaccompanied alien children are now noncitizens unaccompanied children. a memo sent to both ice, this replies to stakeholders, partners, and the general public. it is notable that those who cross the border illegally will no longer have to assimilate. now, they will integrate. president trump once said "we have a country where to assimilate, you have to speak english. this is a country where we speak english, not spanish." and in fact, some media outlets say biden's new inclusive term policy is a rebuke of terms widely used during the trump administration. but the truth is, the terms "illegal alien" or "illegal immigrant" have been used for many, many decades. tucker. >> tucker: trace gallagher for us. thanks so much. got to wonder why the biden administration is issuing anything in english at this point. but it is not just ice. the associated press has just banned the word use of the word mistress. gender-neutral language for drones. they kill people from above. but what really matters is what we call them. don't call them unmanned because it is misogynistic. the faa gave us a statement. the faa is looking to identify and replace terms that may discourage those inspired to work in aviation. so, drones are now aviation. [laughs] what you make of this customer she is the only one who understands it. she has a host of "get tammy brooks on fox nation." what matters is not miss gender in it. >> yeah. you certainly don't want that name sally, do you. because boy, that would give people the impression that women can do by man can do. >> tucker: [laughs] >> it is insane what is going off, but there is a reason for it. there is a method to the madness and i saw it on fold when i was on the left and it was shocking to me, but this is the fact of the matter. the person that controls the language always wins. if this is the dynamic that if you control the language, if you control the definition. but george orwell was concerned about this as well because what he saw it turning into as fascism rose in the first half of the 20th century, was this focus. and we see it with the biden administration. we have seen it throughout the last 20 years here, that the less that you can speak the truth, the less clear language is, the more meaningless that it is, the more vague, truth is the victim. because you can't be specific. and so, you end up having these word salads that you have to crawl through like academia puts it, that mean nothing. and so you don't even know what the topic is and then everyone is required to speak in that manner or right in that manner, creating a vicious circle of foolishness. and it feeds in on itself. so you don't know what questions to ask. and in the beginning of your show, you had a perfect example of it. with the reporters yelling at the sheriff to not use the word "riot," because that was the truth. and if you are not allowed to use that word, then you can have a mostly peaceful demonstration, which completely obscures the reality of what is happening in this country. this is what the left has always done. orwell has written many stories about it. one vote, a small book about lynnwood and politics. this is what the left focuses on, because they can't operate with the truth and with clarity. that is our oxygen for them. it really annihilates their ability to function. >> tucker: if you control the words, you always win. i just think that is so deep and true. it is almost from politics in the english language, as you were talking about. tammy brooks, thank donna great to see you. thank you. >> thank you, sir. >> tucker: we are out of time, amazingly. thankfully we have more time on digital on foxnation.com. the episode today is a long conversation with governor ron desantis. go to foxnation.com and see it. some sad news report here we just learned that former vice president, walter mondo has died. 93 years old. have a great evening. sean hannity stands five. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> sean: and welcome to "hannity." and tonight, we are broadcasting from the always beautiful mar-a-lago in palm beach florida where just moments, the 45th president of the united states, donald j. trump will join us for his first sitdown television interview since leaving the white house. no topic is off-limits. no question is off the table. we will cover joe biden, the radical left of the future of the g.o.p. in 2022 and 2024. covid-19, the crisis on our southern border. the mob, the media, and everything in between.