"the new york times" i don't think has a defensible standard because if sarah jeong had used the "n" word, it doesn't matter what it was, she can go on for years saying horrible things about white people and that's okay. >> look, i'm a big fan of the times. i read it multiple times online every single day so i'm bending over backwards to try to be fair. in the statement that they released i know that they say for a period of time she responded to that harassment by imfating the rhetoric of her harassers implying they were all tit for tat, but it doesn't seem that way for me. >> they're racist on their face and there are some people who make the argument that there is no such thing as racism against white people. that's completely ridiculous, and if you have an imus based on the color of their skin and it's mostly blame worthy and sarah