Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | com
of yours, but i have to correct something you said in a monologue former president trump absolutely did invoke executive privilege. nobody disputes that. not only that, he wrote a letter before the trial started. can reaffirming it in case anyone has a question about it. and that's all in the record. that's different from the navarro case. and judge nicholls even said today, well, the court of appeals opinion could have mentioned that, but they didn't and so on. but of appeals opinion is an abomination. they misstate the facts they omit the facts. they leave out the primary argument, the primary argument here is that in the 60 years since is like a vole case, which says willfully solely in the context of this statute, means did you get a subpoena and comply or not comply with no reason matters. 60 here's since then, the court has the definition of willfully has evolved. so in 2019, the court said literally, when congress wants to say an act is criminal, and they say willfully, you must know that the actor did was illegal or wrong, or we don't attribute criminal liability to it. that