the left comes after her, every time the media comes after her. nikki, i don't have a woman problem, you have a corruption problem. i think that that's what people need to know — nikki is corrupt. this is a woman who will send your kids to die so she can buy a bigger house. would you like to respond? no, it's not worth my time to respond to him. some of nikki haley's contenders came to heraid. some of nikki haley's contenders came to her aid. thomas gift gave us his analysis on the absence of mr trump. i his analysis on the absence of mr trum -. ~ . , his analysis on the absence of mr trum -. ~ .,, ., trump. i think last month night had all the trappings — trump. i think last month night had all the trappings of _ trump. i think last month night had all the trappings of a _ trump. i think last month night had all the trappings of a normal - trump. i think last month night had | all the trappings of a normal debate until you stop and think that the front runner, letter eight, wasn't there and b, didn't want to be there. he's positioned himself as there. he's positioned himself as the inevitable nominee, he stayed above the fray, he's avoided wading into these controversial topics like abortion that can only hurt him, and he's elevated himself to what appears to be a second tier of candidates. they reallyjust comes who comes in second and by how much i does that lead to any candidates actually dropping out.— actually dropping out. well, s-ueakin actually dropping out. well, speaking of _ actually dropping out. well, speaking of the _ actually dropping out. well, speaking of the man - actually dropping out. well, | speaking of the man himself, actually dropping out. well, . speaking of the man himself, it actually dropping out. well, speaking of the man himself, it took 17 minutes before donald trump got a mention, and only one of his four rivals, chris christie, was openly critical of him.— critical of him. let's take a listen. this _ critical of him. let's take a listen. this is _ critical of him. let's take a listen. this is an _ critical of him. let's take a listen. this is an angry, i critical of him. let's take a i listen. this is an angry, bitter man who now wants to be back as president because he wants to exact retribution on anyone who has disagreed with him.— retribution on anyone who has disagreed with him. let's stick with donald trump _ disagreed with him. let's stick with donald trump for _ disagreed with him. let's stick with donald trump for at _ disagreed with him. let's stick with donald trump for at the _ disagreed with him. let's stick with donald trump for at the time - disagreed with him. let's stick with | donald trump for at the time being, he wasn't in alabama, he has done his own town hall question and answer on in alabama, a fraud trial brought against his organisation, chris christie referred to them during debate as he who must not be named, but he seems to be the name on everyone else's lips less than a month from the primary and the cockatoos on the road to the white house. let's go back to thomas gift. thomas, donald trump is a character, are any of these contenders going to give him a run for his money. the only way i see him getting any competition is if there is competition is if there is competition in the republican field. how these primaries works is that as long as donald trump is collecting a plurality of votes and we all know that he has a floor of votes, then he can more or lessjust run that he has a floor of votes, then he can more or less just run the table and i think it becomes a foregone conclusion that he's the nominee. now, if we have a clear second place candidate, coming out of iowa, if that candidate get some momentum into new hampshire and onto south carolina, all the other candidates drop out, then i think you might see a real race. the data shows that about 60% of the republican electorate are at least open to voting for a non—trump candidate, but as long as they are sort of split among many, donald trump is basically going to win this and he's going to win it easily. aside from donald trump, the candidates on stage in alabama each had their own strength that they were playing for, for chris christie it was the anti—trump rhetoric, for nikki haley foreign ambassador to the un, former ambassador, for ramaswamy it was conspiracy theories that he was talking about. with a particular topic that came out as the strong point and most interesting to most americans watching this?— interesting to most americans watchin: this? ., ~ ., �*, ., watching this? you know, it's hard to ick an watching this? you know, it's hard to pick an exact — watching this? you know, it's hard to pick an exact policy _ watching this? you know, it's hard to pick an exact policy issue - to pick an exact policy issue because so much of this debate actuallyjust because so much of this debate actually just centred because so much of this debate actuallyjust centred on actually just centred on personalities actuallyjust centred on personalities and so much of itjust centred on who is more likely to beat donald trump, so i think issues like immigration and the economy and health care, they really played second fiddle to this question of electability. i think there, nikki haley really has the best claim. she's got most of the momentum right now, she's done well in the debates, she won the coveted endorsement of americans for prosperity action, that's a co—pack network that has big money and outreach capacity, and our recent polls say they, she would beatjoe biden in a matchup by double digits, but the other candidates would be more of a dead heat. i really unfortunately cover for those who tuned in to hear about policy, they are going to be somewhat disappointed, but of course this is a primary debate. so in terms of policy, there's not much daylight at the end of the day. we don't have much time left, sojust don't have much time left, so just briefly, one of the things that nikki haley was saying, is she supports us military funding for ukraine, that kind of goes against the grain of many republicans. is that going to damage her, do you think? i that going to damage her, do you think? ., ~ ., �* , think? i do think that it's certainly _ think? i do think that it's certainly a _ think? i do think that it's certainly a challenge, - think? | do think that it's| certainly a challenge, and think? i do think that it's - certainly a challenge, and that reflects growing scepticism about supporting ukraine as the american electorate as a whole, whenever the war started, electorate as a whole, whenever the warstarted, recent electorate as a whole, whenever the war started, recent data shows that that's down to him about 50%, and we're that reflected congress as well. ., . , we're that reflected congress as well. ., ., , , , ., we're that reflected congress as well. ., .,, ,, ., , we're that reflected congress as well. ., ,, ., , ., well. now, has russia been spying on leadin: well. now, has russia been spying on leading figures _ well. now, has russia been spying on leading figures in _ well. now, has russia been spying on leading figures in the _ well. now, has russia been spying on leading figures in the uk? _ that's the accusation being made by the british government — which is pointing the finger at the russian security service, the fsb. what has been taken according to british officials? false online accounts impersonating trusted contacts, in regards to how much has been taken, according to british sources vast amounts. and it comes to who has been targeted, the list is low, politicians, civilservants, think tanks, journalists, academics and others in public life. why, is the big question, to destabilise democracy and undermine the west and various other ways. democracy and undermine the west and various other ways. according democracy and undermine the west and various other ways. according to democracy and undermine the west and various other ways. according to the uk government. russia has not directly commented on these claims yet but it has consistently denied similar allegations in the past. live now to natia seskuria, associate fellow at the royal united services institute. very good to have you on the programme. these accusations have been made against russia, how common are they? been made against russia, how common are the ? ., ., been made against russia, how common are the ? ., ,, , been made against russia, how common arethe ? ., ,, , . been made against russia, how common are the ? ., ,, , . ., are they? thank you very much for havin: are they? thank you very much for having me- — are they? thank you very much for having me. well— are they? thank you very much for having me. well i _ are they? thank you very much for having me. well i think _ are they? thank you very much for having me. well i think it - are they? thank you very much for having me. well i think it is - are they? thank you very much for having me. well i think it is not. are they? thank you very much for having me. well i think it is not a i having me. well i think it is not a surprise that russia has been systematically attempting to interfere in domestic affairs, particularly in countries that the kremlin regards to be its adversaries. these accusations are common, but i think the recent developments of the uk at the accusations we have heard is the loudest confirmation yet from the uk government, an indication that the uk government believes that russia is directly targeting the government official and other significant figures within the uk, which is indeed a very concerning development.— indeed a very concerning development. indeed a very concerning develoment. �* ., , development. has britton been caught un--reared development. has britton been caught unprepared here? _ development. has britton been caught unprepared here? surely _ development. has britton been caught unprepared here? surely this - development. has britton been caught unprepared here? surely this is - unprepared here? surely this is entirely to be expected. yes. entirely to be expected. yes, absolutely- — entirely to be expected. yes, absolutely. targeting - entirely to be expected. yes, | absolutely. targeting officials, civil servants, journalists, other significant figures, this is been a trademark of putin's regime. and russia has been successfully waging the war against the western states, through the gray zone activities. so i think the war against ukraine, russia's war against ukraine has been an eye—opening development in that sense. before the war has happened, i think the western governments have been very much unprepared to counter this kind of measures, and by that i mean cyber attacks as well as disinformation and other tools that russia has been using against the western governments and of course the uk government as well.— government as well. these accusations _ government as well. these accusations are _ government as well. these accusations are against, i government as well. these accusations are against, in| accusations are against, in particular, the fsb which was once known as the kgb, of course putin was once a kgb officer himself, how important is the fsb to president putin in his international operations?— putin in his international operations? putin in his international oerations? , operations? fsb has been serving as a rima operations? fsb has been serving as a primary weapon — operations? fsb has been serving as a primary weapon of _ operations? fsb has been serving as a primary weapon of choice - operations? fsb has been serving as a primary weapon of choice for - a primary weapon of choice for putin, i think he comes from the fsb background as you have noted. and the fsb has been used multiple times to disrupt domestic processes, democratic processes, in the, in countries that russia believes to be there adversaries. and in that sense, of course, the interesting fact is that the uk government has pointed at the specific units within the fsb, so—called cyber units, that are believed to be directly involved and interfering in uk's direct domestic affairs. that is a very important development, but others that we have seen fsb involved in all sorts of other disruptive activities within europe and within the united states as well. {lilia activities within europe and within the united states as well. 0k, from the united states as well. 0k, from the r0 al the united states as well. 0k, from the royal united _ the united states as well. 0k, from the royal united services _ the united states as well. 0k, from the royal united services institute, | the royal united services institute, thank you very much, appreciate your insights. thank you very much, appreciate your insi . hts. , thank you very much, appreciate your insiuhts. , , ., ., . around the world and across the uk. this is bbc news. the government has announced that the bbc licence fee will rise from next april — going up from £159 to £169, 50p. the cost had been frozen for two years, and the increase is based on the consumer price index rate of inflation for last september — which stood at 6.7%. the culture secretary liz frazer, said there would be a review into alternative ways of funding the bbc. i'm announcing today that the government is launching a review of the bbc�*s funding model. the review will look at how we can ensure the funding model is fair to the public, sustainable for the long term and supports the bbc�*s vital role in growing our creative industries. the board of the bbc said the settlement will still require further changes on top of the major savings which are already being delivered. it added that content budgets would be hit — which would have a significant impact on the uk's wider creative sector. there is of course much more on the bbc news website. you're live with bbc news. borisjohnson has told the covid inquiry that claims he didn't care about the suffering being inflicted on the country and wanted to let covid rip were simply not right. appearing for a second day — the former prime minister said he had experienced at first hand, during his time in intensive care, how appalling covid could be. he also said he had been "perplexed" at the suggestion that top mrjohnson also gave an explanation and an apology for the parties at 10 downing street. i've extensively tried to explain how i think that came about and why i think the people who were working in downing street for a very long time and very hard believed that they were operating, working within the rules of the time, though, as i say to to you, to those you represent and again, to the to to many, i understand fully the point that you are making. and i regretted it very much. lets go to chris smith live from the inquiry. he again apologised for the downing street parties, but documents from the time that are most revealing and we found out actually at the time the first story was broken, december 2021, he told the cabinet secretary probably should have been a bit more hard on some of his staff for their behaviour during covid, that's before he spent several months insisting all rules were followed. he posed more difficult questions for rishi sunak when he appeared for the inquiry next week by saying, i don't know how it came that we weren't consulted on this, it's all very odd. you can imagine the inquiry wants to ask you soon at that —— ask sunak that. agonising about some of the decisions he had to make. ~ 3 , about some of the decisions he had to make. ~ �*, , to make. while it's interesting you mention that. _ to make. while it's interesting you mention that, chris, _ to make. while it's interesting you mention that, chris, because - to make. while it's interesting you| mention that, chris, because boris johnson has a reputation as being someone who is quite verbose, quite bombastic, but we are seeing quite a different character on full public display in the sanctuary and this full public display does of course include people who were directly impacted by the effects of covert. yes, that's right, the sort of rambunctious, was largely absent from these hearings. he was much more sober, restrained, in some cases almost adjacent when he apologised to families to families. whether that's genuine emotion or careful preparation with his legal team but he was striking a downbeat note at times, even when it did seem to go against his natural instincts. did he say anything that surprised anyone, did you think? i did he say anything that surprised anyone, did you think?— did he say anything that surprised anyone, did you think? i don't think an one anyone, did you think? i don't think anyone would've _ anyone, did you think? i don't think anyone would've come _ anyone, did you think? i don't think anyone would've come out - anyone, did you think? i don't think anyone would've come out to - anyone, did you think? i don't think anyone would've come out to us - anyone, did you think? i don't think anyone would've come out to us of| anyone would've come out to us of the view of the inquiry and had fundamentally changed, i think most people that we were late to act both the spring and the autumn and couldn't quite work out how to balance it against the economy, nothing borisjohnson is saying is going to change our minds, and those who are looking for him to be skewered, to take that part of the inquiry, i don't think we'll see anything there but unequivocally negligent decision we did learn about the decision making, structure of the british state i think which is often what this inquiry is supposed to be about, improving, for the future, i mean for me, the most striking of mission —— admission johnson made, yes we understood the warnings, we have the numbers, half a million people more were going to die, hejust couldn't a million people more were going to die, he just couldn't quite get his head around the idea that a disaster of that scale might be coming to britain. you know, despite all our warnings and civil servants reports and registers in whitehall, politicallyjust and registers in whitehall, politically just couldn't grasp and registers in whitehall, politicallyjust couldn't grasp it. it just politicallyjust couldn't grasp it. itjust makes you wonder how much else might be looming around the corner that the state isn't getting its head around at the moment. {lilia its head around at the moment. 0k, chris smith, — its head around at the moment. 0k, chris smith, political editor for the times, thanks for your company, thank you. it was probably only a matter of time before someone worked out how to use artificial intelligence for nefarious purposes. well, now it seems that moment has come. a bbc news investigation has revealed that a feature on the chatgpt app — which allows users to easily build their own artificial—intelligence assistants — could be used to create tools for cyber—crime. the feature, called gpt builder, was launched last month by open ai ceo sam altman. it allows users to build customised versions of chatgpt for, quote, "almostanything." for more on this, i'm joined now by the bbc�*s cyber correspondent — joe tidy. joe, tell us a bit more about what your investigation has uncovered. we've known for a while, heavily, that there have been these warnings, that there have been these warnings, that as you say, a i could be used ljy that as you say, a i could be used by cyber criminals and scammers and fraudsters, but we haven't really worry too much about it because of course the biggest models, the most powerful models out there, the likes of gpt have got guardrails around them, they are moderated. so if you ask the normal everyday chat gpt to prove for example, make a whatsapp scan message, which of these fraudster messages that go around pretending to be from your daughter or son, pretending to be from your daughter orson, lost pretending to be from your daughter or son, lost in the city, i don't have my phone, send a taxi. the normal chat gpt won't do that, they'll say it's unethical. but if you use chat gpt or openai new gpt builder you can make whatever you want and you can create a custom gpt model, we did it out as an experiment, we made when it was an expert in social and she engineering, it gave you reasons why the these scams work because they use the principles of mothering, a mother's instinct and the need for greed, that kind of thing, so they are helping potentially cyber criminals out there. in are helping potentially cyber criminals out there.- are helping potentially cyber criminals out there. in the last few weeks we've _ criminals out there. in the last few weeks we've seen _ criminals out there. in the last few weeks we've seen the _ criminals out there. in the last few weeks we've seen the world's - criminals out there. in the last few weeks we've seen the world's first| weeks we've seen the world's first ai safety summit held here in the uk. is this the job of government or is this thejob uk. is this the job of government or is this the job of industry to regulate themselves? i think eve one regulate themselves? i think everyone is _ regulate themselves? i think everyone is still _ regulate themselves? i think everyone is still working - regulate themselves? i think everyone is still working thatj everyone is still working that outcome are they? we haven't got any legislation in place for how to handle ai, we know for example there are guidelines now that lots of different companies and countries have signed up for, there was an event last week where an international coalition of cyber authorities came up with a list of guidelines the likes of openai should be following in order to keep these ai tools on the right track. interestingly we haven't heard anything back from open—air about this, we explained the experiment and how this tool is essentially a gpt built solely for cyber crime, and we haven't heard anything back from them. of course they have been, their ceo sam altman travelling the world saying that al safety is crucial. �* g ., ., ., world saying that al safety is crucial. �* ., ., ., , crucial. and, joe, have we heard any stories about — crucial. and, joe, have we heard any stories about hey _ crucial. and, joe, have we heard any stories about hey how _ crucial. and, joe, have we heard any stories about hey how ai _ crucial. and, joe, have we heard any stories about hey how ai has - crucial. and, joe, have we heard any stories about hey how ai has used i stories about hey how ai has used in this way to impact people?— this way to impact people? not in this way to impact people? not in this particular _ this way to impact people? not in this particular case. _ this way to impact people? not in this particular case. we _ this way to impact people? not in this particular case. we know, - this way to impact people? not in this particular case. we know, for example, there are illegal large language models out there that have been created for the sole purpose of what i'm describing, but nothing anywhere near as powerful as gpt for, orany anywhere near as powerful as gpt for, or any of the other mainstream models. we haven't seen this yet, i wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing this kind of thing. i wouldn't be the only person in the world that's had this idea, for example. i think it's going to be the challenge now for the likes of openai to try to put some guardrails and moderation around these kinds of models which are basically a free—for—all in a sense. you can build whatever you want out there, as long as you have, you know, an idea and you know how to train the models. i have to say as well, none of this took any programming or coding, i did it in a few minutes with zero technical experience. jae with zero technical experience. joe tid , or with zero technical experience. joe tidy, or cyber correspondent thank you very much, and you can read his full report on the bbc news website and the bbc news app of course, all the details about his investigation uncovered and how ai could be used for nefarious purposes. you are watching bbc news. the poet and writer benjamin zephaniah has died at the age of 65. he had been diagnosed with a brain tumour eight weeks ago. his family described him as a �*true pioneer and innovator�*. our media correspondent david sillito looks back at his life. i used to think nurses were women. i used to think police were men. i used to think poets were boring, until i became one of them. this is benjamin zephaniah. benjamin zephaniah... i love me mudder and me mudder love me. we come so far from over de sea. he rose to fame in the �*80s, his dub poetry rooted in the rhythms, language and street politics of his home, handsworth, in birmingham. his words were political, musical, radical, reflecting racism and what life was really like on the streets. it was also highly acclaimed — the recipient of 16 honorary doctorates and for one friend and fellow poet, his passing is a terrible loss. i think what marked benjamin out was his very unique personality, he was... his roots, so proud of his roots. and he was a kind, funny person. he also appeared more recently in peaky blinders. dearly beloved, we are gathered here today... in a statement, his family said he was a true pioneer and innovator, who has left the world a joyful and fantastic legacy, the poetry of benjamin zephaniah. i am not the problem. if you give me a chance, i'll teach you of timbuktu. i can do more than dance. i am not the problem. i greet you with a smile. you put me in a pigeonhole. but i am versatile. well, these conditions may affect me as i get older, and i am positively sure i have no chips upon my shoulders. black is not the problem. mother country, get it right. and just for the record, some of my best friends are white. the poet and writer benjamin zephaniah who's died at the age of 65. dr max kinnings is a reader in creative writing at brunel university where professor zephania was the chair of creative writing. good evening to you, thank you for being with us. we heard there in that piece, just the spread of some of this man's many talents, and pieces of work. what was it about him, for you, that stood out? well. him, for you, that stood out? well, ben'amin him, for you, that stood out? well, benjamin was _ him, for you, that stood out? well, benjamin was obviously _ him, for you, that stood out? well, benjamin was obviously a _ him, for you, that stood out? well, benjamin was obviously a giant - him, for you, that stood out? -ii benjamin was obviously a giant of popular culture, and you know, he was a poet, novelist, musician, television presenter, actor as we just heard in peaky blunders, he was also a brilliant activist for animal rights and veganism but above all he was just a kind and rights and veganism but above all he wasjust a kind and generous man and he was wonderful. obviously i worked at him at brunel university as he was professor of creative writing and i saw him working with students and i saw him working with students and i saw his generosity and his kindness. he left words and language, he left to help students to speak their truth through poetry and spoken word, and he was truly inspirational, and it was always staggering to me how much he sort of moved people and connected with people. when he first started at brunel back in 2011, i was asked to show him around the campus. and it literally took about an hour and a half because everywhere we went, people wanted to stop and talk to him. a couple of people even wanted to hug him, which he was quite happy to hug him, which he was quite happy to oblige with. and one pictures with him, and hejust connected with people. i think he was that sort of fundamental connection that people felt with him, not only on a personal level but also through his work. there really sort of sets him apart, and you know, it's a huge loss to the cultural fabric of this country, and obviously, you know, to me and my colleagues at brunel university and the creative writing department there, he's left a, an unsellable gap. he department there, he's left a, an unsellable gap-— unsellable gap. he talked in interviews — unsellable gap. he talked in interviews in _ unsellable gap. he talked in interviews in the _ unsellable gap. he talked in interviews in the past - unsellable gap. he talked in interviews in the past how. unsellable gap. he talked in | interviews in the past how he unsellable gap. he talked in - interviews in the past how he had a difficult upbringing, a violent household. he clearly got a huge sense of reward and gratification from working in particular with young people. from working in particular with young people-— from working in particular with ouna --eole. , ., ., , young people. yes. oh no, he really did. and young people. yes. oh no, he really did- and he — young people. yes. oh no, he really did. and he ran _ young people. yes. oh no, he really did. and he ran a _ young people. yes. oh no, he really did. and he ran a module _ young people. yes. oh no, he really did. and he ran a module for- young people. yes. oh no, he really did. and he ran a module for our. did. and he ran a module for our third year undergraduate programme here at brunel, and it was performance poetry. and obviously students were writing their poor tree, but also performing it, and opting that is quite a scary thing for people, particularly if they haven't performed before. and he really sort of helped them with that and to see him work with the students and sort of the respect and admiration that they have... i’m admiration that they have... i'm sor will admiration that they have... i'm sorry will have _ admiration that they have... i'm sorry will have to _ admiration that they have... i'm sorry will have to leave it there, we're out of time. thank you very much for sharing your thoughts with thanks forjoining me, except as the context but here's the weather with staff. hello there. it's going to remain unsettled for the rest of this week. spells of wet and windy weather around, but it will be noticeably mild. but with more rain falling on saturated ground, we've already seen some localised flooding is going to exacerbate existing flooding problems up and down the uk. so stay tuned to the forecast. this area of low pressure has been quite potent. lots of isobars on the charts being very blustery, active weather front, slowly spreading northwards and eastwards. and we've been introducing milder air pretty much right across the country throughout the day. and now the rain becomes confined to the north east of scotland, the northern isles, with a strong winds through the course of the night. elsewhere, it's a little bit quieter, some clear spells, but showers or longer spells of rain pushing into northern and western areas as low pressure sticks close by. and it will be blustery, but a largely frost free night to come. so for friday, we start off with a bit of sunshine across southern and eastern areas. showers from the word go in the north and the west. they merge together to produce longer spells of rain at times into the afternoon. but i think east and southeast england may escape. most of the showers stay largely dry with some sunshine, and it will be a milder day. double figure values for england, wales, northern ireland, eight or nine degrees across scotland. for friday night, it stays quite blustery. see further showers or longer spells of rain pushing northwards across scotland, northern england. then the next batch of weather fronts and low pressure move into the south west to bring wet and windy weather here. and again, a fairly mild at night to come than what we've had of late. and again, a fairly mild night to come than what we've had of late. this area of low pressure moves through during saturday and then for sunday we've got another low pressure system bringing another spell of wet and rather windy weather to our shores. so it'll start quite wet saturday. england, wales. northern ireland. looks like the rain will become confined to scotland through the afternoon. it brightens up for northern ireland, certainly for england and wales through the afternoon with sunny spells, a few scattered showers and feeling very mild, 11—14 degrees that feel pleasant in the sunshine. nine degrees across scotland. sunday starts off dry with some sunshine this stage, but then it looks like it'll turn wetter and windier as we move through the day and turn very windy in the northwest corner of the country with gales developing here. but once again, it's going to be pretty mild for the time of year. many central and southern areas seeing temperatures in double figures. it remains unsettled into the new week as well. the signs of high pressure starting to build in for the second half of the week, which will bring some quieter, cooler, sunnier weather. hello, i'm christian fraser. you're watching the context on bbc news. outmatch russia by 30—1 in terms of the size of our economies, we outmatch russia by 30—1 in terms of the size of our economies, the size of our gdps. we've just got to make that size count. they are playing chicken with our national security, that's what we're seeing here, and israel will remember them harshly. —— history well. -- history well. iwill not -- history well. i will not go back to south carolina _ -- history well. i will not go back to south carolina to _ -- history well. i will not go back to south carolina to explain... i will help— to south carolina to explain... i will help all— to south carolina to explain... i will help all of— to south carolina to explain... i will help all of our— to south carolina to explain... i will help all of our allies. - to south carolina to explain... i will help all of our allies. but i will help all of our allies. but we've — will help all of our allies. but we've got— will help all of our allies. but we've got the _ will help all of our allies. but we've got the help _ will help all of our allies. but we've got the help ourselves| will help all of our allies. but - we've got the help ourselves first. we are expecting to hear from foreign secretary david cameron alongside his us counterpart, antony blinken. it's a visit clearly focused on trying to get that funding the united nations that it could no longer operate in operation in gaza. paul adams will be with us tonight. we'll speak to lord bethell test and trace minister during the pandemic on what he thinks the inquiry is delivering. good evening. in a video call with g7 leaders last night, president volodymyr zelensky