let's start with the metro. it says there's a growing backlash against borisjohnson over the westminster lobbying row. the same story makes the front page of the i, with the prime minister facing mounting conservative anger over the handling of the owen paterson affair. the former health secretary matt hancock is calling for nhs workers to be legally required to get covid vaccinations before the winter. that's in the telegraph. the guardian reports that a watchdog had to prevent ministers breaching a code on political neutrality and independence during the search for new chairs for the bbc and the british film institute. and the ft says paris prosecutors are probing the french operations of sanjeev gupta, the uk metals magnate, over allegations of "misuse of assets". those are the front pages. we will begin our chat. caroline and tony, lovely to see you both again. caroline, could you kick because of plays, the storm in a sleaze cap on the front page of the metro. i plays, the storm in a sleaze cap on the front page of the metro. i think we will be seeing _ quite a few funds over the next few days because once again, boris johnson is kind of being hit by allegations that he has been somewhat, what shall we say, casual with his privileged position at the top of the ladder of power in this country so obviously needs a recap of the events of last week when his tory colleague owen paterson came underfire and this tory colleague owen paterson came under fire and this coincided with obviously a restructuring of the standards committee is obviously thatis standards committee is obviously that is all still having ricochets throughout the parliamentary characters as even many of his tory mps are starting to complain their mailing boxes are full of complaints saying, why should i ever believe you when you stand any card and devote with the tory weight when it is a u—turn? —— stand in the corridor and vote with a tory whip. topped up by allegations in the sunday times that it extends to the house of lords with all sorts of you pay your 3 million, you get your period. it always looks a little sticky but on the other hand, —— your peerage. we sticky but on the other hand, -- your peerage-— sticky but on the other hand, -- our eeraue. ~ . ., ., your peerage. we have a teflon pan minister from _ your peerage. we have a teflon pan minister from the _ your peerage. we have a teflon pan minister from the sense _ your peerage. we have a teflon pan minister from the sense that, - your peerage. we have a teflon pan minister from the sense that, tony. i minister from the sense that, tony. i wouldn't say so. boris johnson has iwouldn't say so. borisjohnson has obvious— i wouldn't say so. borisjohnson has obvious character flaws which has had had _ obvious character flaws which has had had throughout his career and toadies_ had had throughout his career and toadies knew that when they elected him as_ toadies knew that when they elected him as their leader. i have been covering — him as their leader. i have been covering westminster —— the tories. i covering westminster —— the tories. i have _ covering westminster —— the tories. i have never— covering westminster —— the tories. i have never seen a stunning self when _ i have never seen a stunning self when does — i have never seen a stunning self when does the government have managed — when does the government have managed to inflict upon themselves in the _ managed to inflict upon themselves in the past — managed to inflict upon themselves in the past few days because of anyone — in the past few days because of anyone who knows anything about how the house _ anyone who knows anything about how the house of commons works would have been_ the house of commons works would have been able to look at this tactic— have been able to look at this tactic and _ have been able to look at this tactic and think one step ahead and realise _ tactic and think one step ahead and realise this — tactic and think one step ahead and realise this would end in failure. it realise this would end in failure. it has _ realise this would end in failure. it has ended in failure but managed to upset— it has ended in failure but managed to upset the tory mps who rebelled because _ to upset the tory mps who rebelled because they are still being hit with the — because they are still being hit with the same sleaze allegations as the tory— with the same sleaze allegations as the tory mps who did not rebel and the tory mps who did not rebel and the tory— the tory mps who did not rebel and the tory mps who did not rebel and the tory mps who did not rebel are now the tory mps who did not rebel are how any— the tory mps who did not rebel are now any situation where less than 24 latei’. _ now any situation where less than 24 later, the _ now any situation where less than 24 later, the government pulls the rug from under— later, the government pulls the rug from under them so there is a lot of anger— from under them so there is a lot of anger meant— from under them so there is a lot of anger meant —— anger in the conservative party. this is one of a series_ conservative party. this is one of a series of— conservative party. this is one of a series of errors that the government has found _ series of errors that the government has found itself in i do not think it means — has found itself in i do not think it means curtains for him or the government but had to a growing sense _ government but had to a growing sense that he does not believe rules apply— sense that he does not believe rules apply to _ sense that he does not believe rules apply to men will basicallyjust do whatever— apply to men will basicallyjust do whatever he wants any minute, any moment— whatever he wants any minute, any moment to — whatever he wants any minute, any moment to get the solution he wants -- rutes— moment to get the solution he wants —— rules apply to him. it is moment to get the solution he wants -- rules apply to him.— -- rules apply to him. it is at the same story _ -- rules apply to him. it is at the same story on — -- rules apply to him. it is at the same story on the _ -- rules apply to him. it is at the same story on the front - -- rules apply to him. it is at the same story on the front page - -- rules apply to him. it is at the i same story on the front page of the i. what likely consequences are there on this? be followed, anger, backlash, labour calling for him to step down. backlash, labour calling for him to ste down. �* ., backlash, labour calling for him to step down-— backlash, labour calling for him to ste down. �* . �* ., step down. angela rayner didn't hold back this week— step down. angela rayner didn't hold back this week and _ step down. angela rayner didn't hold back this week and has _ step down. angela rayner didn't hold back this week and has keir _ step down. angela rayner didn't hold back this week and has keir starmerl back this week and has keir starmer this morning whizzing, the whole thing reeks of like a sewer. you can hear the indignation in tony's voice is a long time follower of house apparel. it is unprecedented and we see that the tories are where they were referring to go on a couple points up. i appreciate we are all talking about is because we follow these things religiously. ijust don't know it beyond this media bubble of concern about this, i think we still have to wait and see. we have had so many examples of things we thought would break this chain and perhaps inspire some self reflection. we have talked about bouncy castle, the prorogation of parliament, etc, and nothing has stuck —— about the castle. you parliament, etc, and nothing has stuck -- about the castle. you feel ou have stuck -- about the castle. you feel you have been _ stuck -- about the castle. you feel you have been covering _ stuck -- about the castle. you feel you have been covering politics - stuck -- about the castle. you feel you have been covering politics for| you have been covering politics for many years and if a question to you is do you think public confidence actually matters to this government? i think the government is in a strong — i think the government is in a strong position generally in the sense _ strong position generally in the sense that... i do not have 16 hours to talk— sense that... i do not have 16 hours to talk about — sense that... i do not have 16 hours to talk about what is wrong with the labour _ to talk about what is wrong with the labour party but they cannot consistently cut through naples. in 2010 to _ consistently cut through naples. in 2010 to 2015 parliament —— the bolts — 2010 to 2015 parliament —— the polls the _ 2010 to 2015 parliament —— the polls. the fact the opposition cannot— polls. the fact the opposition cannot even rise a few more points and at _ cannot even rise a few more points and at the — cannot even rise a few more points and at the tories won't fall if you more _ and at the tories won't fall if you more points means the government's position— more points means the government's position overall is strong, but the point _ position overall is strong, but the point is _ position overall is strong, but the point is it's— position overall is strong, but the point is it's comedy of —— a few more — point is it's comedy of —— a few more -- — point is it's comedy of —— a few more -- the _ point is it's comedy of —— a few more. —— the government is connotative. et al. effects people because my day—to—day life so the government is very popular— day—to—day life so the government is very popular now. i expect that to change _ very popular now. i expect that to change over the next six months but even then— change over the next six months but even then i— change over the next six months but even then i does not make the next electiorr— even then i does not make the next election which may be up to three years away. we will turn to the front page — three years away. we will turn to the front page of _ three years away. we will turn to the front page of the _ three years away. we will turn to the front page of the guardian i three years away. we will turn to l the front page of the guardian and the front page of the guardian and the story at the bottom left—hand corner, a new rule could buy mps from consultancy roles.— corner, a new rule could buy mps from consultancy roles. yes, this is obviously the _ from consultancy roles. yes, this is obviously the next _ from consultancy roles. yes, this is obviously the next stage _ from consultancy roles. yes, this is obviously the next stage in - from consultancy roles. yes, this is obviously the next stage in the - obviously the next stage in the story which is the scratching heads, time of reflection and lessons learned. so keir starmer called for this this morning. i would be surprised —— sir keir starmer. i would be surprised if they do not make some gesture but if you think how many of the tories come up to 30 parliamentarians, according to this newspaper are earning between 180000 and 100s of pounds a year. hundreds of pounds is not sound much, but they already have an £82,000 salary as an mp in the house of commons and the house of lords, there is an allowance. obviously there will be some exceptions and anybody who sees somebody going off and doing a medical chef, a hospital chef, no one will argue with that. it obviously adds to the knowledge and experience —— medical shift or hospital shift. those who sit on some board, have a nice lunch, pocket a large sum, it is called the revolving door, you will make policies while you're in parliament, sitting on what is meant to be independent committees, you revolve back out into the real world and enjoy the benefits of that decision making. this is a basic entry—level page one of the corruption handbook, or at least it looks like it could be open to that. i would love to see this happen but i don't know if it will. ,, y this happen but i don't know if it will. . y ., y this happen but i don't know if it will. ,, , ., , , ., this happen but i don't know if it will. ,, y ., , , ., , will. surely, tony, this would be covered under... _ will. surely, tony, this would be covered under... 0r— will. surely, tony, this would be covered under... orjohn - will. surely, tony, this would be| covered under... orjohn nolan's will. surely, tony, this would be - covered under... orjohn nolan's -- covered under... orjohn nolan's —— john major's nolan principles with cover that. john major's nolan principles with coverthat. is john major's nolan principles with cover that. is this being ignored? it would not break the nolan principles because under that it would _ principles because under that it would not be allowed. caroline picked — would not be allowed. caroline picked on _ would not be allowed. caroline picked on a really important point which _ picked on a really important point which is _ picked on a really important point which is if— picked on a really important point which is if you're a doctor or nurse and going — which is if you're a doctor or nurse and going out to work it is seen as nice and _ and going out to work it is seen as nice and fluffy but if you are a qc putting _ nice and fluffy but if you are a qc putting any— nice and fluffy but if you are a qc pulling any lot, it is seen as bad and wrong _ pulling any lot, it is seen as bad and wrong. it would not surprise me because _ and wrong. it would not surprise me because this — and wrong. it would not surprise me because this backfired so badly, if they have — because this backfired so badly, if they have to ban consultancies altogether that would be a sweet irony _ altogether that would be a sweet irony as— altogether that would be a sweet irony as far as i'm concerned. let's change the result together. _ as i'm concerned. let's change the result together. the _ as i'm concerned. let's change the result together. the front - as i'm concerned. let's change the result together. the front page - as i'm concerned. let's change the result together. the front page of| result together. the front page of the daily telegraph, is there is an extraordinary intervention by matt hancock? the extraordinary intervention by matt hancock? , , , , hancock? the surprise is the telegraph — hancock? the surprise is the telegraph have _ hancock? the surprise is the telegraph have seen - hancock? the surprise is the telegraph have seen fit - hancock? the surprise is the telegraph have seen fit to i hancock? the surprise is the l telegraph have seen fit to give hancock? the surprise is the - telegraph have seen fit to give matt hancock, erstwhile important person, such a big spread on its front page. but yes, he has waded in. you could argue he has in the past and is perhaps still has access to important knowledge and he seemed to be doing a fair to middling attempt at thejob of be doing a fair to middling attempt at the job of health secretary before he was so abruptly thrown, defenestration to borrow tony's lovely word, and he has waded in to make it mandatory for nhs that they have the covered mac vaccination before winter hits. this would validate the passage of care workers already having it —— covid. we will see if the government see fit to follow this. if the government do, the paper says it will not be until spring next year. by, the paper says it will not be until spring next year.— the paper says it will not be until spring next year._ i . the paper says it will not be until l spring next year._ i want spring next year. a bit late? i want to clear up — spring next year. a bit late? i want to clear up one _ spring next year. a bit late? i want to clear up one thing _ spring next year. a bit late? i want to clear up one thing and _ spring next year. a bit late? i want to clear up one thing and cabinet . to clear up one thing and cabinet ministers — to clear up one thing and cabinet ministers do not have access to vast components— ministers do not have access to vast components of important information. it is curiously telegraph —— amounts of important — it is curiously telegraph —— amounts of important information. the counterpoint comes from the nhs themselves who say their concern is lots of— themselves who say their concern is lots of workers willjust leave the national — lots of workers willjust leave the national health service rather than -et national health service rather than get vaccinated and then the staffing crisis that— get vaccinated and then the staffing crisis that already exists will get even _ crisis that already exists will get even worse and winter is a vital time _ even worse and winter is a vital time for— even worse and winter is a vital time for the nhs, even worse and winter is a vital time forthe nhs, it even worse and winter is a vital time for the nhs, it is when it is at busiest — time for the nhs, it is when it is at busiest which is why they have decidedm — at busiest which is why they have decided... to insist on mandatory vaccination — decided... to insist on mandatory vaccination but wait until the spring — vaccination but wait until the spring. he has made some important points— spring. he has made some important points about vulnerable patients, cancer _ points about vulnerable patients, cancer patients, etc, his immune systems— cancer patients, etc, his immune systems would be compromise going into hospital and the people trying to save _ into hospital and the people trying to save the lives could contribute to save the lives could contribute to causing — to save the lives could contribute to causing problems or killing them. but the _ to causing problems or killing them. but the nhs makes a good point also about— but the nhs makes a good point also about having a staffing crisis already _ about having a staffing crisis already. i think invented something like 99%_ already. i think invented something like 99% vaccination amongst its nhs staff, which i think goes to show that britain started out being a leader— that britain started out being a leader in— that britain started out being a leader in vaccination across a whole range _ leader in vaccination across a whole range of— leader in vaccination across a whole range of fields, but other countries have cut _ range of fields, but other countries have cut up — range of fields, but other countries have cut up significantly with us. we already have nine in ten nhs workers have been double vaccinated within the nhs. staying with the daily telegraph and the northern ireland protocol could be scrapped. oh, my goodness, meanwhile on the other side of the room, this is all going on and it shows no signs of going on and it shows no signs of going away. what is theirs, it is handbags at dawn or beginning to look that way. how many years ago tony and i sat here and i think one of us intelligently say, must have been tony, that it was always going to be a contradiction between saving the union of northern ireland and saving of the union of northern ireland and the uk and embracing the principles of brexit and here we are. of course, it has not been working on the threat is that article 60 will have to be triggered, but it is on, the onus is on one side of the other to show societal homes and disadvantages —— article 16. it looks like that is happening as far as the uk is concerned and judgment day will happen, article 16 will be pulled by the end of this month. it looks like both sides are preparing to that. john major saying it would be absurd if that happens, tony. it john major saying it would be absurd if that happens, tony.— if that happens, tony. it would be absurd but _ if that happens, tony. it would be absurd but no _ if that happens, tony. it would be absurd but no more _ if that happens, tony. it would be absurd but no more absurd - if that happens, tony. it would be absurd but no more absurd than l if that happens, tony. it would be - absurd but no more absurd than boris johnson _ absurd but no more absurd than boris johnson agreeing a treaty with the european — johnson agreeing a treaty with the european union —— negotiating a treaty— european union —— negotiating a treaty with— european union —— negotiating a treaty with the european union and then later— treaty with the european union and then later saying it is unacceptable, etc. the government knew— unacceptable, etc. the government knew there — unacceptable, etc. the government knew there would be a trade—off, they would not be a border on the island _ they would not be a border on the island of— they would not be a border on the island of ireland so accustomed checks— island of ireland so accustomed checks would have to be on the irish sea, checks would have to be on the irish sea. so _ checks would have to be on the irish sea. so at _ checks would have to be on the irish sea, so at ports in northern ireland _ sea, so at ports in northern ireland. this is yet another example boris _ ireland. this is yet another example borisjohnson thinking, oh, i'll 'ust borisjohnson thinking, oh, i'll just do— borisjohnson thinking, oh, i'll just do the now and later on i will say i _ just do the now and later on i will say i never— just do the now and later on i will say i never meant to do it or it has gone _ say i never meant to do it or it has gone wrong — say i never meant to do it or it has gone wrong and try and change it. it is not _ gone wrong and try and change it. it is not so _ gone wrong and try and change it. it is not so much handbags at dawn, it is not so much handbags at dawn, it is like _ is not so much handbags at dawn, it is like we _ is not so much handbags at dawn, it is like we have got a handbag and they have — is like we have got a handbag and they have a massive digger. i think it is important to point that out as welt _ it is important to point that out as welt it— it is important to point that out as welt it is— it is important to point that out as well. it is britain against the european union. which is a much more significant _ european union. which is a much more significant player in a world trade than the — significant player in a world trade than the uk is, let's be frank about that. we are enterin: let's be frank about that. we are entering the _ let's be frank about that. we are entering the final— let's be frank about that. we are entering the final week - let's be frank about that. we are entering the final week of - let's be frank about that. we are l entering the final week of cop26, let's be frank about that. we are i entering the final week of cop26, a front page of the guardian, too few of us are willing to change our lifestyle to save the planet. i’m lifestyle to save the planet. i'm anno ed lifestyle to save the planet. i'm annoyed boris _ lifestyle to save the planet. i“n annoyed borisjohnson has annoyed boris johnson has single—handedly annoyed borisjohnson has single—handedly managed to take all of the front pages away from this and that is my bitter pill swallowing this week. no surprises that few are willing to change their lifestyles to save the planet. we all have problems giving away our toys are being asked to give something up. that is what is being happening. people are not good or bad, theyjust like being told what to do and for it to be convenient, so it is going to require systemic one—off massive scale decision—making on behalf of corporations. i think if you leave it to the individual, we all have that little drop in the ocean, little pebble on the beach, what is the point of me doing anything? i think we owe relate to that. band think we owe relate to that. and many people _ think we owe relate to that. and many people saying, what else can i do? , ., ., ., ., do? -- be a relate to that. the government — do? -- be a relate to that. the government has _ do? -- be a relate to that. the government has made - do? -- be a relate to that. the government has made some i do? -- be a relate to that. the - government has made some pretty bold moves _ government has made some pretty bold moves here, _ government has made some pretty bold moves here, to be fair to them. i think— moves here, to be fair to them. i think from — moves here, to be fair to them. i think from 2030 the sale of petrol diesel— think from 2030 the sale of petrol diesel cars — think from 2030 the sale of petrol diesel cars will not be legal, that has a _ diesel cars will not be legal, that has a great commitment from the government but it requires a massive scaling _ government but it requires a massive scaling up _ government but it requires a massive scaling up of charging technology and that — scaling up of charging technology and that takes government investment and that takes government investment and the _ and that takes government investment and the government to spend less money— and the government to spend less money -- — and the government to spend less money —— money. —— spend money. i think that is the key there. as an individual— i think that is the key there. as an individual consumer, it can seem very— individual consumer, it can seem very difficult what to do but he did not particularly help in boris johnson _ not particularly help in boris johnson saying recycling effectively don't work. . ., at 1130 four as. thank you very much indeed. that's it for the papers this hour. tony grew and caroline frost will be back at 11.30 for another look at the papers. goodbye for now. this week, sustainability is the name of the game, which is why i'm on the eve ecargo bike. it's electric, it's made from natural and recycled materials, and it's usually used for inner city deliveries. but today, it is delivering me to the studio. nice wheels! oh, hello down there! hey! sinclair c5 — blast from the past! i know! an icon of the �*80s created by a computing icon. in memory of sir clive sinclair, i'm taking this for a spin, but it's really been souped up. inside is an escooter with some brand new batteries, which means i can go pretty fast! here! wait for me! cheering and applause spencer chuckles whoa! ah! 0h! good engines! that's how to arrive in a studio! hey! welcome to click! hello, hello, hello! oh, look at us! we've got a shiny studio! we have an audience! hello, audience! cheering and applause and right next door, through that wall and across the river a bit, we have some very important neighbours. yes, we're here at bbc scotland in pacific quay glasgow and just over there, the united nations climate conference, cop26, is hosting leaders from around the world, along with 25,000 delegates from 196 nations. the question is will they agree to take the steps needed to tackle our climate emergency? the un says current systems won't suffice. we need new ideas and solutions to secure our future. and so in this show, we're asking what role do technology and innovation play in helping reduce our emissions? can technology save our world? so, let's start, and did you know that one of the biggest causes of greenhouse gas emissions is the agriculture industry? now, we know we need to cut down on our meat consumption and one of the reasons is that cattle are responsible for 10% of those emissions. yes — but it's not from what we think it is, is it? the back end? no, no, it's not, no. nearly all methane from cows — 95% — comes from the front and not the back. yep, it's all about the burps. 10% of our entire greenhouse gas emissions come from cow burps. and that means you, magenta — everybody, meet magenta, magenta, everybody. applause she's appearing here alongside her her team and her showbiz agent eileen wall, head of research at scotland's rural college. eileen, welcome. hi, spencer, and hello, magenta. hello, magenta. can i ask you what is magenta wearing and why? magenta's wearing the latest in wearable technology for our bovine friends. she's got two bits of kit on her. one, a pedometer — kind of like what we all wear on our wrists — that measures what she is doing, lying down, sitting, walking around and how much energy she's using. and around her neck, she's got something that measures her head movements so we can know when she's eating and when she might be producing something out of her front end. and that helps you to work out how much methane she's producing? yeah, so methane is produced after she's eaten her meals, so if we know how much she's eating, how often she's eating, we'll be able to extrapolate her methane, as well as being able to measure it to compare it. and you have belch chambers, is that right? we do. we use those for research, that's not something we use routinely in the field, and we use it very infrequently to really get an idea of how the methane changes over time, how it might differ for this cow over another cow or eating different foods. is there any way we can find out how much methane magenta's producing right now? yeah, so the equipment that we have in the chamber is not exactly the same as this — this is a laser methane reader. right. that measures the parts per million of methane that might be coming out of magenta's front end at any one time. i'm going to get out of the way because it's a laser! there's a laser, and we all know how dangerous lasers are. so magenta, if you don't mind. yeah, don't listen, magenta! 0k. oh, she's licking it, she knows it's coming. she doesn't chase it like a cat does. oh, she's... and the reading is 18 ppm. so it's been a while since she's had a lot of food. ok, she's having a clean day. well, that went a lot more smoothly than it may have done! but what comes out of a cow can also be affected by what you put into a cow. this lot are eating feed created from seaweed found in the waters of hawaii, and its makers, blue ocean barns, claim it cuts emissions by 80%. but will it make your beef taste fishy? apparently not, because the thing is... bugs! come and get your lovely bugs! your tasty, crunchy, nutritious bugs! spencer, what are you doing? lara, welcome to my wondrous emporium filled to the brim with fine foods from the future. oh, great, because i'm absolutely starving. 0k. well, i tell you what, get your lips around these delicacies. um, ok, i'm actually thinking that because our audience have gone to the trouble of coming here to join us today... oh, right, ok, yes. ..that they may be more deserving of this than me. i'm sure you'd love to try some, wouldn't you? just here, we've got the first course for you. help yourselves. did we fill in the forms for this? i'm sure there were forms. listen, trust me, they're not bad. i've eaten roasted mealworm in china and it never did me any harm. see, in the future, we might be eating more insects than meat. they are cheap, they're richer in protein, calcium and iron and have less fats than beef, pork or chicken. best of all, there are bazillions of them. yes, i heard there are 1.5 billion per person on earth. what do you think? how do they taste? they're very crispy. crispy. you don't look too impressed. and you? like roasted chickpeas. ok, that's not bad! interesting. do you like roasted chickpeas? love 'em, yeah. 0k! fairenough! how about... ..these? ok, that actually looks borderline appetising. hmm—mm. do you want to try? i think i may be asking you again. yeah, right, ok, yeah. just behind here you will find that. all right. just have a taste of that. there we go, anytime you're ready, and i will tell you that these are — drum roll — spicy crickets. yes? these dishes are made from insects packed by a british firm called bug — who love bugs, obviously — and they say that bugs use less water, they use less land than animals, they need less feed than animals and, in fact, they can be fed on the things that we throw away. but are they delicious? weakly: they're quite spicy! clears throat 0k. a bit of a kick. right, i don't think you're impressed by any of this! i think it's like _ sweet—and—sour chicken. ok — again, that's not bad! you'll eat anything! chickpeas and sweet and sour chicken! i think you've got dinner here sorted, haven't you? totally! now, it's all very well having tasty stuff to eat but in terms of the climate, how ourfood is produced is key. and our very ownjen copestake is in a greenhouse for us. jen. yes, i'm here in the norwich greenhouse and it looks completely different than it did on my last visit. it's absolutely filled with plants now. there are 378,000 tomato plants here, and that represents 5% of the uk's consumption of tomatoes. last year, we saw this world—first project being built using an environmentally friendly heating system. a typical greenhouse would burn fossil fuels to create the heat that you need to go through these rails. but our greenhouse takes waste heat from sewage treatment works. we use that heat instead of burning fossil fuels. the hard hats and hi—vis gear we wore last time have been replaced by coveralls to protect the crops from bringing in external bugs and viruses. workers here have their clothes cleaned on—site. and how many people are working here now? cos when i came before, there was nobody. yeah, so we have about 50 people currently working in here on picking. so these tomatoes are going out to the shops? yes, yeah, they're being picked, ready to be packed and you'll see them in the supermarket soon. and we see different varieties of tomatoes, so can you explain what's going on? as we've got here, this is ready to be picked. these ones are just starting to get some colour on, so they'll be picked within the next ten days. we introduce predatory insects. at the beginning the year, we introduce macrolophus pygmaeus, which is a true bug. it's a predatory insect that feeds on anything like whitefly, aphids, commonly known as greenfly, spider mites. there's one of my macrolophus. ah! hello! so we do not want to damage him? he's fine? he looks like a greenfly. yeah, he's just searching away, looking for something to eat. because we're coming to the end of the crop, we've taken the top of the plant off. so this would have extended all the way to the top of the greenhouse? up to the top of the wire, the string here. oh, wow. so we keep a buffer over the top of the greenhouse so we can control the atmosphere and the climate within here. and more produce is growing in a greenhouse just next door using the same green technology. how many cucumbers are you growing in the other greenhouse? the other greenhouse here is 14 million cucumbers. 14 million? 22 million peppers. 22 million peppers?! i don't know how many tonnes of tomatoes, but a lot. it's done better than we'd anticipated in its first year, if i'm honest. yeah. and, but, you know, great. so this project has proven that you can grow a large scale of produce in a low—carbon way — you just need to be near a waste heat source, and there are plenty of those around the world. thanks, jen. of course, once our crops have been harvested, they need to be stored safely so they don't spoil. an estimated 630 million tonnes of grain goes bad each year, which is such a waste. well, dr lorenzo conti thinks he might have a solution. dr lorenzo, what is it? what we have developed, lara, is the world's first subterranean drone and we're using it specifically to help the grain storage operators maintain the quality of their stock. you called it a drone but it doesn't look much like drone. that's right. since there wasn't a word in the dictionary to describe what it is we have come up with one. we call it a crover. how does it work and what does it do exactly? it swims through grain in storage, like in silos and sheds, monitoring the conditions of the grain like temperature and moisture and helping maintain quality. how does this vary from conventional methods of looking after your grain? well, traditionally you would need a farmer to physically walk on top of the grain bulk with a heavy spear and taking samples at a few points which is dangerous and in some situations not possible to do. ok, that sounds like a biggerjob. so do you think farmers are going to use this? right now, we're focused mostly on centralised grain storage hubs which are usually owned by grain merchants and port operators but we'd like to develop in the future a version that is suitable for farmers as well. ok, and i'm hoping when it's used in the real world, it doesn't mix up the grains like that. i can hardly look! thank you so much, dr lorenzo. thank you, lara. and that is it for our click special from cop26 in glasgow. as ever, you can keep up with the team throughout the week. find us on social media, on youtube, instagram, facebook and twitter @bbcclick. thanks for watching and we'll see you soon. bye— bye. hello, monday morning gets off to a chilly start, a touch of frost around parts of eastern scotland and down the eastern side of england. milder air poised to move back in with a set of atlantic weather fronts bringing in a rush of air. central and eastern and southern parts of england clouding up about saying loudly dry during daylight hours. a chilly feel in norwich but up hours. a chilly feel in norwich but up to 15 degrees in belfast. the breeze picking up with the rain moving in as well. further outbreaks of rain across scotland, northern ireland overnight into tuesday and pushing into parts of northern england. to the south of that, largely dry and much milder on monday night. tuesday, some patchy rain in northern england, especially to the west of the pennines for wales. pushing to the midlands and south—east england. sunny spells in scotland and northern ireland, if you share is moving their way southwards. mild does it will be for the rest of the week —— a few showers. welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore, i'm karishma vaswani. the headlines... iraq's prime minister appeals for calm — after surviving a drone attack on his home in baghdad. the uk's prime minister is accused of "corrupt and contemptible behaviour" by the opposition labour party — after he tried to protect a former cabinet minister who had broken lobbying rules. chinese president xijinping is expected to cement his authority and legacy at a key communist party gathering which opens this monday. and the us will shortly reopen its borders to fully vaccinated travellers from much of the world.