will be here with a full round up of the days news. first it's time for newscast. we are working on the tradition that there is none worth reviving. that makes me — there is none worth reviving. that makes me really _ there is none worth reviving. twat makes me really worried. cake was a big thing for us during the brexit years. and now croissants. yes. all you are actually eating on their tv. if ed miliband was here he would tell me it's not advisable. ts if ed miliband was here he would tell me it's not advisable.- tell me it's not advisable. is that a normal butter _ tell me it's not advisable. is that a normal butter based _ tell me it's not advisable. is that| a normal butter based croissant? this is_ a normal butter based croissant? this is where your expertise will be looked upon. if a butter based croissant. looked upon. if a butter based croissant-— looked upon. if a butter based croissant. ~ ., ., ., ~ croissant. what are you talking about? so _ croissant. what are you talking about? so basically— croissant. what are you talking about? so basically the - croissant. what are you talking | about? so basically the greatest iece of about? so basically the greatest piece of investigative _ about? so basically the greatest piece of investigative journalism about? so basically the greatest i piece of investigative journalism at that my— piece of investigative journalism at that my entire career was here at cop 26~ — that my entire career was here at cop 26. the climate change conference in glasgow and going for breakfast _ conference in glasgow and going for breakfast one morning i reached reached — breakfast one morning i reached reached legendary status already and we talked _ reached legendary status already and we talked about on the podcast this week but— we talked about on the podcast this week but here's the tv version. with added _ week but here's the tv version. with added pictures of chris eno croissant in case you didn't know what _ croissant in case you didn't know what it _ croissant in case you didn't know what it looked like. i was surprised to find _ what it looked like. i was surprised to find out— what it looked like. i was surprised to find out that a plant based croissant _ to find out that a plant based croissant had more of a bigger carbon— croissant had more of a bigger carbon footprint than a bacon roll and that— carbon footprint than a bacon roll and that seems a bit counterintuitive because we are always — counterintuitive because we are always being told one of the things you can _ always being told one of the things you can do — always being told one of the things you can do to help reduce greenhouse gases _ you can do to help reduce greenhouse gases is _ you can do to help reduce greenhouse gases is eat— you can do to help reduce greenhouse gases is eat less meat. of course length _ gases is eat less meat. of course length on — gases is eat less meat. of course length on social media, farmers and a bit because they said all it shows are hot— a bit because they said all it shows are hot the — a bit because they said all it shows are not the bad guys but it turns out it _ are not the bad guys but it turns out it was — are not the bad guys but it turns out it was wrong. they put on for the wrong — out it was wrong. they put on for the wrong kind of croissant. the kind _ the wrong kind of croissant. the kind of— the wrong kind of croissant. the kind of croissant you're eating now, a butter— kind of croissant you're eating now, a butter one — kind of croissant you're eating now, a butter one which is full of dairy and it— a butter one which is full of dairy and it turns _ a butter one which is full of dairy and it turns out that a true plant based _ and it turns out that a true plant based croissant has a fifth the carbou— based croissant has a fifth the carbon footprint of a normal one. because — carbon footprint of a normal one. because an — carbon footprint of a normal one. because an international incident because — because an international incident because he bumped into the french mihister_ because he bumped into the french minister and she told french people to eat _ minister and she told french people to eat fewer croissants. which is... newscast from the bbc. hello. it is chris in the — newscast from the bbc. hello. it is chris in the city. _ newscast from the bbc. hello. it is chris in the city. it _ newscast from the bbc. hello. it is chris in the city. it is _ newscast from the bbc. hello. it is chris in the city. it is lower- newscast from the bbc. hello. it is chris in the city. it is lower in - chris in the city. it is lower in the studio with one and a half croissants for those people who are listening rather than watching. it listening rather than watching. it is at an the riverside studio in front— is at an the riverside studio in front of— is at an the riverside studio in front of their cop 26 climate conference in glasgow. hooray. we have loads — conference in glasgow. hooray. we have loads to _ conference in glasgow. hooray. we have loads to get _ conference in glasgow. hooray. we have loads to get to. _ conference in glasgow. hooray. we have loads to get to. beyond - have loads to get to. beyond croissants, vegan or otherwise. lara, quite a lot of stuff going on at westminster in the last 2a hours and particularly today thursday, with the development hour by hour around notjust one particular backbencher from a cabinet minister although he is at the epicenter of this, but the whole business of how mps and how their behavior is regulated. but bigger than that, what people looking in on this of it without absolutely, if you have been living under a rock come out to the short version, when pattison was a tory cabinet minister, failing to the short version, when pattison was a tory cabinet minister, very long serving more than a dozen times by talking to the government about various issues that he was on the payroll of two companies. the report into him and — payroll of two companies. the report into him and the _ payroll of two companies. the report into him and the standards _ payroll of two companies. the report. into him and the standards committee was very clear that he had made on the wrong thing. he's always insisted that he was innocent and he was acting in the public interest. by was acting in the public interest. by the standards committee which is in charge of making sure mps don't do naughty things reprimanded that he should be suspended for 30 days. parliament is going to have to vote on that. but instead of having a vote on that yesterday the tories came up with a plan to overhaul the rules that he had been found guilty of which would have protected him and torn up the rule book basically. that both speak to last night by a team each ring of a majority of 80, that tells you something is wrong. but it was a furious backlash, lots of tories were outraged, front pages were appalling for the conservatives this morning. and it became very clear that the opposition parties would not work with the government on creating this new system. so the big state, screeching u—turn, and then when pattison has now click and it is a mess. it backfired spectacularly and it's really raised this issue again and it's also start up this issue again and it's also start up all his questions about the prime ministers on attitude following the rules. we ministers on attitude following the rules. ~ , ., ., ministers on attitude following the rules. , ., ., . ., , rules. we should hear in the chamber this morning — rules. we should hear in the chamber this morning doing _ rules. we should hear in the chamber this morning doing the _ rules. we should hear in the chamber this morning doing the bit _ rules. we should hear in the chamber this morning doing the bit that - rules. we should hear in the chamber this morning doing the bit that if - this morning doing the bit that if you could put us on track to his death and break being pulled. the tires smoking and the car completely changing direction. n iast tires smoking and the car completely changing direction.— changing direction. i last nights debate as conveyed _ changing direction. i last nights debate as conveyed to - changing direction. i last nights debate as conveyed to the - changing direction. i last nights - debate as conveyed to the individual case with— debate as conveyed to the individual case with a — debate as conveyed to the individual case with a general concern. this link needs— case with a general concern. this link needs to be broken. therefore, i link needs to be broken. therefore, i and _ link needs to be broken. therefore, i and others — link needs to be broken. therefore, i and others will be looking to work on a cross— i and others will be looking to work on a cross party basis to achieve improvements in our system for future _ improvements in our system for future cases. | improvements in our system for future cases-— improvements in our system for future cases. ~' . ., . , ., future cases. i think the chances of now bein: future cases. i think the chances of now being request _ future cases. i think the chances of now being request by _ future cases. i think the chances of now being request by the - future cases. i think the chances of| now being request by the consensus on this are dead as a dodo. even though the government has than it's been. i think so. instead of saying yes, let's look at the new system, from a factory now by the opposition parties very strongly reacting today send i have a chat area with cast—iron or deliberative processes is nothing less than corruption. what they have done is corrupt and often _ what they have done is corrupt and often in _ what they have done is corrupt and often in the — what they have done is corrupt and often in the situation make think you have — often in the situation make think you have a — often in the situation make think you have a prime minister who is trying _ you have a prime minister who is trying to— you have a prime minister who is trying to lead on public standards and what — trying to lead on public standards and what you've got with display nrinister— and what you've got with display minister in the pie minister who is leading _ minister in the pie minister who is leading his — minister in the pie minister who is leading his troops through the sewer and self— leading his troops through the sewer and self to _ leading his troops through the sewer and self to complete mess of their own making. it�*s and self to complete mess of their own making-— own making. it's a very strong activation _ own making. it's a very strong activation to _ own making. it's a very strong activation to say _ own making. it's a very strong activation to say this - own making. it's a very strong activation to say this is - own making. it's a very strong l activation to say this is corrupt. it activation to say this is corrupt. it is _ activation to say this is corrupt. it is corrupt _ activation to say this is corrupt. it is corrupt. because _ activation to say this is corrupt. it is corrupt. because there - activation to say this is corrupt. it is corrupt. because there is l activation to say this is corrupt. it is corrupt. because there is a clear— it is corrupt. because there is a clear finding after the process about — clear finding after the process about on _ clear finding after the process about on hutchison engaging in paid iobbying~ _ about on hutchison engaging in paid lobbying. that's been outlawed right in the _ lobbying. that's been outlawed right in the environment for many, many years _ in the environment for many, many years so. — in the environment for many, many years. so, there is a clear finding and then— years. so, there is a clear finding and then to — years. so, there is a clear finding and then to rip the whole system up to protect _ and then to rip the whole system up to protect him is corrupt. there is no point _ to protect him is corrupt. there is no point messing around and pretending that something else. it is corruption and on this occasion it's corruption from the top, from the pie _ it's corruption from the top, from the pie minister down because he whipped — the pie minister down because he whipped his mps devotes to bring down _ whipped his mps devotes to bring down the — whipped his mps devotes to bring down the entire standards system and that has— down the entire standards system and that has very wide implications for politics— that has very wide implications for politics for — that has very wide implications for politics for standards in public life in — politics for standards in public life in the _ politics for standards in public life in the united kingdom that do well beyond this individual case. there _ well beyond this individual case. there are — well beyond this individual case. there are two bits of this i find intriguing _ there are two bits of this i find intriguing watching _ there are two bits of this i find intriguing watching this - there are two bits of this i find intriguing watching this from . there are two bits of this i find intriguing watching this from a | intriguing watching this from a distance _ intriguing watching this from a distance. hearing _ intriguing watching this from a distance. hearing jacob- intriguing watching this from a distance. hearing jacob rees i intriguing watching this from a - distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in _ distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in the — distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in the debate _ distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in the debate of— distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in the debate of two _ distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in the debate of two think- distance. hearing jacob rees marg say in the debate of two think gotl say in the debate of two think got conftated, — say in the debate of two think got conflated, the _ say in the debate of two think got conflated, the system _ say in the debate of two think got conflated, the system and - conflated, the system and individual. _ conflated, the system and individual. and _ conflated, the system and individual. and actually i conflated, the system and individual. and actually ifl conflated, the system and i individual. and actually if you conflated, the system and - individual. and actually if you read the amendment— individual. and actually if you read the amendment that _ individual. and actually if you read the amendment that keep - individual. and actually if you read the amendment that keep us- individual. and actually if you read the amendment that keep us off. individual. and actually if you readl the amendment that keep us off by the amendment that keep us off by the mps _ the amendment that keep us off by the mps ied — the amendment that keep us off by the mps ied by— the amendment that keep us off by the mps led by andrea, _ the amendment that keep us off by the mps led by andrea, it- the amendment that keep us off by the mps led by andrea, it explicitlyi the mps led by andrea, it explicitly iisted _ the mps led by andrea, it explicitly listed the _ the mps led by andrea, it explicitly listed the two — the mps led by andrea, it explicitly listed the two things _ the mps led by andrea, it explicitly listed the two things on _ the mps led by andrea, it explicitly listed the two things on the - the mps led by andrea, it explicitly listed the two things on the same i listed the two things on the same motion _ listed the two things on the same motion and _ listed the two things on the same motion. and the _ listed the two things on the same motion. and the second - listed the two things on the same motion. and the second thing - listed the two things on the same motion. and the second thing is. listed the two things on the same i motion. and the second thing is that when _ motion. and the second thing is that when this— motion. and the second thing is that when this first — motion. and the second thing is that when this first emerged _ motion. and the second thing is that when this first emerged it _ motion. and the second thing is that when this first emerged it look - motion. and the second thing is that when this first emerged it look like i when this first emerged it look like it was— when this first emerged it look like it was a _ when this first emerged it look like it was a backbench _ when this first emerged it look like it was a backbench initiative - when this first emerged it look like it was a backbench initiative by- it was a backbench initiative by some — it was a backbench initiative by some concerned _ it was a backbench initiative by some concerned conservative i it was a backbench initiative by. some concerned conservative mps it was a backbench initiative by- some concerned conservative mps and it quickly— some concerned conservative mps and it quickly became _ some concerned conservative mps and it quickly became clear— some concerned conservative mps and it quickly became clear this _ some concerned conservative mps and it quickly became clear this was - some concerned conservative mps and it quickly became clear this was a - it quickly became clear this was a really— it quickly became clear this was a really orchestrated _ it quickly became clear this was a really orchestrated organized - it quickly became clear this was a i really orchestrated organized thing that peopie — really orchestrated organized thing that peopie like _ really orchestrated organized thing that people like the _ really orchestrated organized thing that people like the chief- really orchestrated organized thing that people like the chief weapon. that people like the chief weapon had been — that people like the chief weapon had been making _ that people like the chief weapon had been making phone - that people like the chief weapon had been making phone calls- that people like the chief weapon. had been making phone calls about and it— had been making phone calls about and it was— had been making phone calls about and it was really— had been making phone calls about and it was really planned _ had been making phone calls about and it was really planned and - and it was really planned and executed _ and it was really planned and executed i— and it was really planned and executed. i wanted _ and it was really planned and executed. i wanted to - and it was really planned and executed. i wanted to ask . and it was really planned and i executed. i wanted to ask you and it was really planned and - executed. i wanted to ask you about the conspiracy— executed. i wanted to ask you about the conspiracy theories _ executed. i wanted to ask you about the conspiracy theories that - executed. i wanted to ask you about the conspiracy theories that then - the conspiracy theories that then change _ the conspiracy theories that then change to— the conspiracy theories that then change to the _ the conspiracy theories that then change to the system _ the conspiracy theories that then change to the system was - the conspiracy theories that then i change to the system was designed basically— change to the system was designed basically to— change to the system was designed basicaiiy tolust _ change to the system was designed basically to just save _ change to the system was designed basically to just save 19, _ change to the system was designed basically to just save 19, when - basically to just save 19, when pattison, _ basically to just save 19, when pattison, theory— basically to just save 19, when pattison, theory number- basically to just save 19, when pattison, theory number one i basically to just save 19, when i pattison, theory number one and theory— pattison, theory number one and theory number _ pattison, theory number one and theory number to— pattison, theory number one and theory number to accommodate i pattison, theory number one and i theory number to accommodate not necessarily— theory number to accommodate not necessarily about _ theory number to accommodate not necessarily about the _ theory number to accommodate not necessarily about the system - theory number to accommodate not necessarily about the system can i necessarily about the system can make _ necessarily about the system can make about _ necessarily about the system can make about the _ necessarily about the system can make about the woman - necessarily about the system can make about the woman who - necessarily about the system can make about the woman who runs necessarily about the system can i make about the woman who runs a system _ make about the woman who runs a system at — make about the woman who runs a system at the _ make about the woman who runs a system at the moment. _ make about the woman who runs a l system at the moment. independent commissioner— system at the moment. independent commissioner for— system at the moment. independent commissioner for standards, - commissioner for standards, catherine _ commissioner for standards, catherine stone. _ commissioner for standards, catherine stone. what - commissioner for standards, catherine stone. what you . commissioner for standards, - catherine stone. what you make of those _ catherine stone. what you make of those conspiracy— catherine stone. what you make of those conspiracy theories? - catherine stone. what you make of those conspiracy theories? [- catherine stone. what you make of those conspiracy theories?- those conspiracy theories? i think it's absolutely _ those conspiracy theories? i think it's absolutely true _ those conspiracy theories? i think it's absolutely true to _ those conspiracy theories? i think it's absolutely true to say - those conspiracy theories? i think it's absolutely true to say there i those conspiracy theories? i think it's absolutely true to say there isi it's absolutely true to say there is no love lost between downing street and catherine stone who is the independent commissioner for standards. that's the case. it suggested to me that somehow boris johnson has got a real hate towards her because she found his behavior had not been absolutely as it should have been over that holiday and fairness we should also say they did nothing wrong and downing street had said they genuinely were trying to look at reforming the system because there is a widespread view that it does not work that well. i think it's clearly about more than one person. and now tonight, and westminster there are fingers being pointed at the chief whip but do you want to know that anatomy of how it's been described to me of exactly what happened?— what happened? should we do that after we heard _ what happened? should we do that after we heard from _ what happened? should we do that after we heard from you _ what happened? should we do that after we heard from you when - after we heard from you when pattison and that statement to semi—with the anatomy of how it's been described to me of exactly what happened? should we do that after we heard from you when pattison and that statement to semi—see what he sang tonight before we unpick exactly where we are and what you're hearing? we have not heard from only pattison in front of cameras or microphones but he put out a written statement which i can bring you a bit of. he says... a reference to his late wife who took her own life last year. he was clear that one _ took her own life last year. he was clear that one of _ took her own life last year. he was clear that one of the _ took her own life last year. he was clear that one of the reasons - took her own life last year. he was clear that one of the reasons why i clear that one of the reasons why she had the connection trust was the whole process and how long the investigation dragged on and she had found out very distressing indeed. but i think that strength of feeling from ellen pattison and among his backers and his friends who were looking for a way out i think that came together as has been digested to me a concern in number ten about how this system works. what i understand happened was the cheap 7 chief whip was basically given an instruction that i was told he would set a target of finding a way of reforming the standard system and protecting them when pattison. he then found john whittingdale a friend of the newscast for 7 from a conservative cabinet minister to say we have got this idea about changing the system and would you be prepared to do it? he said i don't particularly fancy it but 0k to do it? he said i don't particularly fancy it but ok i'm being asked to do something, he believes also there is some concern about the way the process worked and angela letson and another former cabinet minister there in a group, brexiteers, former ministers, scene era. she put her name down into the amendment at that they were going to try and make this in parliament but of course, suddenly what happened in parliament last night with christ in shame, one neighbor and parliament last night with christ in shame, one neighborand becoming what have you done to this place? furious backlash and all the paper and that any downing street goes with the screeching u—turn and john whittingdale and other people involved i thinking hang on and in any, you guys were as a result when pattison felt well happened next week is they would have been a vote in parliament and he would have been suspended and instead what we are looking at is of iraq 7 by election and i'm looking for a second opposition party is going to leave this alone. it's also the case of the parties who think this thing does not cut through it, boris johnson is a politician people know that he has made a career out of getting this impression that he doesn't always do exactly the right thing but so what? of course downing street would say obviously he has not been anything wrong but they think in a way somehow they may be immune from this stuff but opposition parties are starting to question that case and its maids some politicians feel awkward. it’s some politicians feel awkward. it's been some politicians feel awkward. it�*s been felled here in glasgow hundreds of miles away because obviously it's a huge jamie of miles away because obviously it's a hugejamie sterry and you can ignore it and there are quite a lot of conservative mps here because they've got interests in what's happening in crp 26 in front of them are quite scathing about it as well to the lesson is the gossip has been in the air. we've got ministers here as well and you've got other government business here that is potentially being overshadowed by this so there was a huge announcement about phasing out coal power today which was one of boris johnson's big priorities but there crp 20 7 cop president i asked him about ellen pattison and the business secretary when i bumped into him i did not asking about some stats i asked about comments he made about the parliamentary commissioner for standards. about the parliamentary commissioner forstandards. be about the parliamentary commissioner for standards. be still stand by your comments about the parliamentary commissioner for standards7 do you think she should stay, do you think she would have a difficult time staying in post? that was informative, wasn't it? placement test to predict the effect the entire world is here i am now joined in this riverside location because i've beenjoined by former home secretary, form a working set 7 secretary and former energy secretary at the time of the paris climate change agreement, amber rod. thank you. and former woman in the quantities— thank you. and former woman in the quantities minister. thank you. we will talk— quantities minister. thank you. we will talk about your subject which is this, _ will talk about your subject which is this, the — will talk about your subject which is this, the seppi 26 and a second but what's — is this, the seppi 26 and a second but what's your reaction to what's been _ but what's your reaction to what's been happening with ellen pattison, with the _ been happening with ellen pattison, with the u—turn on the attempt to change _ with the u—turn on the attempt to change the standard system? i have watched _ change the standard system? i have watched it _ change the standard system? i have watched it with growing horror and sadness _ watched it with growing horror and sadness. ellen pattison has had, if you just _ sadness. ellen pattison has had, if you just accept the situation as far as i you just accept the situation as far as i can _ you just accept the situation as far as i can see — you just accept the situation as far as i can see from their distance here _ as i can see from their distance here he — as i can see from their distance here he could have had choices going forward _ here he could have had choices going forward and — here he could have had choices going forward and today we've learned that he has _ forward and today we've learned that he has decided to an mp altogether. so i he has decided to an mp altogether. so i think— he has decided to an mp altogether. so i think he has been poorly advised — so i think he has been poorly advised after doing some things but i advised after doing some things but i don't _ advised after doing some things but i don't know but he's clearly been found _ i don't know but he's clearly been found wanting in many different ways and i found wanting in many different ways and i wish _ found wanting in many different ways and i wish he had just accepted that rather— and i wish he had just accepted that rather than — and i wish he had just accepted that rather than perhaps being encouraged by his— rather than perhaps being encouraged by his friends to challenge it in this way — by his friends to challenge it in this wa . ., ., ., , this way. one of the famous line from back _ this way. one of the famous line from back in _ this way. one of the famous line from back in their _ this way. one of the famous line from back in their brexit - this way. one of the famous line l from back in their brexit argument days when you were on the tv with the prime minister, the now premised on the side describing him as the life of the party but he's not the man you wanted to drive you home at the end of the evening with ultimately about trust and this whole thing boils down to trust. and the potential for people thinking i'm having it in politics. that could be the consequence and it's a great shame because as we often say most vast majority of politicians are trustworthy good people and they try hard and they have a very difficult time. i must say having seen his resignation letter that that really stuck with me is his message to his family. it is very unusual as a career that your whole family have to take the consequences with you in quite such a way. mas family have to take the consequences with you in quite such a way.- with you in quite such a way. was it riaht for with you in quite such a way. was it right for number _ with you in quite such a way. was it right for number ten _ with you in quite such a way. was it right for number ten to _ with you in quite such a way. was it right for number ten to try - with you in quite such a way. was it right for number ten to try to - with you in quite such a way. was it right for number ten to try to rip i right for number ten to try to rip up right for number ten to try to rip upthe— right for number ten to try to rip up the rules?— right for number ten to try to rip up the rules? no. no, it was not riuht. i up the rules? no. no, it was not right- i would — up the rules? no. no, it was not right. i would not _ up the rules? no. no, it was not right. i would not have _ up the rules? no. no, it was not| right. i would not have supported up the rules? no. no, it was not. right. i would not have supported it if i had been there. i think it was a misjudgment of an epic and baffling proportion because the u—turn was swift because the consequence was enormous and rightly so. ., consequence was enormous and rightly so. ., ., , , consequence was enormous and rightly so. ., ., , , , ., consequence was enormous and rightly so. ., ., ,, ., consequence was enormous and rightly so. ., ., ,, i. ., ., consequence was enormous and rightly so. ., ., ., so. one of the “obs you do now, some --eole so. one of the “obs you do now, some people would — so. one of the jobs you do now, some people would call— so. one of the jobs you do now, some people would call lobbying. _ so. one of the jobs you do now, some people would call lobbying. now - so. one of the jobs you do now, some people would call lobbying. now that| people would call lobbying. now that you know more about that world, the thing that's compatible with being an mp at the same time as well? could you do both of those things? i could you do both of those things? i don't do lobbying. l could you do both of those things? i don't do lobbying. i invite _ could you do both of those things? i don't do lobbying. i invite you - could you do both of those things? i don't do lobbying. i invite you to - don't do lobbying. i invite you to don't do lobbying. i invite you to do some kind — don't do lobbying. i invite you to do some kind of _ don't do lobbying. i invite you to do some kind of public - don't do lobbying. i invite you to do some kind of public affairs. i | do some kind of public affairs. i have never engaged with the government. i only speak to businesses. wejust government. i only speak to businesses. we just label it all is one thing and he would say this is a very different thing.— very different thing. lobbying is about the you — very different thing. lobbying is about the you contact _ very different thing. lobbying is about the you contact the - very different thing. lobbying is - about the you contact the ministers or mps— about the you contact the ministers or mps are — about the you contact the ministers or mps are select committees and whatever— or mps are select committees and whatever it is. and the answer is no, i_ whatever it is. and the answer is no, i don't — whatever it is. and the answer is no, i don't think it is consistently fast~ _ no, idon't think it is consistently fast it— no, ldon't think it is consistently fast it is— no, i don't think it is consistently fast. it is difficult for mps to have — fast. it is difficult for mps to have alternative jobs but i think there _ have alternative jobs but i think there is— have alternative jobs but i think there is something they can to but there is something they can to but the business of not being a minister on behalf— the business of not being a minister on behalf of someone you are paid by is rightly— on behalf of someone you are paid by is rightly not allowed. you on behalf of someone you are paid by is rightly not allowed.— is rightly not allowed. you are there for the _ is rightly not allowed. you are there for the paris _ is rightly not allowed. you are there for the paris climate - is rightly not allowed. you are - there for the paris climate change agreement, i don't know how widely understood that document actually is. 195 country setting out their plans to limit the dangerous impact of climate change and to reduce emissions. that's why paris was so distinct from glasgow and was so extraordinary at the time we actually got one agreement signed by 195 countries. bud actually got one agreement signed by 195 countries-— 195 countries. and they headline fi . ure was 195 countries. and they headline figure was about _ 195 countries. and they headline figure was about limiting - 195 countries. and they headline figure was about limiting the - figure was about limiting the increase in global temperatures by the end of the century to two degrees. but then you are seeing baysse in this other one. fin degrees. but then you are seeing baysse in this other one.- baysse in this other one. on the front of the _ baysse in this other one. on the front of the document _ baysse in this other one. on the front of the document itself - baysse in this other one. on the front of the document itself it i baysse in this other one. on the i front of the document itself it was always _ front of the document itself it was always about two degrees. and at the very last _ always about two degrees. and at the very last moment the weekend when we all absolutely exhausted about 4am another _ all absolutely exhausted about 4am another text came out and the french had cut— another text came out and the french had cut off— another text came out and the french had cut off the coffee let alone the food in _ had cut off the coffee let alone the food in the building was being dismantled around us and this one and a _ dismantled around us and this one and a half— dismantled around us and this one and a half degrees appeared and it was to— and a half degrees appeared and it was to keep on the half degrees within— was to keep on the half degrees within reach and it was the small island _ within reach and it was the small island states he pushed on that a fantastic— island states he pushed on that a fantastic man called tony from the marshall— fantastic man called tony from the marshall islands who sadly no longer with us— marshall islands who sadly no longer with us on— marshall islands who sadly no longer with us on the uk and eu are very keen— with us on the uk and eu are very keen on— with us on the uk and eu are very keen on a — with us on the uk and eu are very keen on a much more ambitious agreement— keen on a much more ambitious agreement in the us and china which is now— agreement in the us and china which is now china — agreement in the us and china which is now china is pushing back on the idea that _ is now china is pushing back on the idea that one and a half degrees is the real— idea that one and a half degrees is the real text and ambition. it was going _ the real text and ambition. it was going to — the real text and ambition. it was going to be — the real text and ambition. it was going to be two degrees but it's really— going to be two degrees but it's really good news that since paris people _ really good news that since paris people have become more ambitious and we _ people have become more ambitious and we can— people have become more ambitious and we can look around us to see why _ and we can look around us to see why i_ and we can look around us to see why i do — and we can look around us to see why. i do see the evidence of climate — why. i do see the evidence of climate change for people wanting more _ climate change for people wanting more ambitious progress than was originally— more ambitious progress than was originally envisaged.— more ambitious progress than was originally envisaged. thank you for cominu originally envisaged. thank you for coming and — originally envisaged. thank you for coming and joining _ originally envisaged. thank you for coming and joining us _ originally envisaged. thank you for coming and joining us tonight. - originally envisaged. thank you for coming and joining us tonight. if i coming and joining us tonight. if people _ coming and joining us tonight. if people have _ coming and joining us tonight. if people have not _ coming and joining us tonight. if people have not been _ coming and joining us tonight. if people have not been followingl coming and joining us tonight. if- people have not been following this, there's— people have not been following this, there's been— people have not been following this, there's been a— people have not been following this, there's been a real— people have not been following this, there's been a real flurry— people have not been following this, there's been a real flurry of- people have not been following this, there's been a real flurry of stuff- there's been a real flurry of stuff emerging — there's been a real flurry of stuff emerging at _ there's been a real flurry of stuff emerging at the _ there's been a real flurry of stuff emerging at the beginning - there's been a real flurry of stuff emerging at the beginning of. there's been a real flurry of stuffi emerging at the beginning of this week— emerging at the beginning of this week but— emerging at the beginning of this week but if— emerging at the beginning of this week but if people _ emerging at the beginning of this week but if people aren't - emerging at the beginning of this. week but if people aren't following the ins _ week but if people aren't following the ins and — week but if people aren't following the ins and outs _ week but if people aren't following the ins and outs of— week but if people aren't following the ins and outs of it— week but if people aren't following the ins and outs of it in— week but if people aren't following the ins and outs of it in simple - the ins and outs of it in simple terms — the ins and outs of it in simple terms you _ the ins and outs of it in simple terms you can _ the ins and outs of it in simple terms you can what _ the ins and outs of it in simple terms you can what difference | the ins and outs of it in simple i terms you can what difference do the ins and outs of it in simple - terms you can what difference do you think this _ terms you can what difference do you think thisjamboree _ terms you can what difference do you think this jamboree in _ terms you can what difference do you think this jamboree in that _ think this jamboree in that wonderful— think this jamboree in that wonderful home _ think this jamboree in that wonderful home city - think this jamboree in that wonderful home city is - think this jamboree in that i wonderful home city is going think this jamboree in that - wonderful home city is going to make? — wonderful home city is going to make? there _ wonderful home city is going to make? there are _ wonderful home city is going to make? there are two _ wonderful home city is going to make? there are two things . wonderful home city is going to. make? there are two things that wonderful home city is going to - make? there are two things that are really— make? there are two things that are really important _ make? there are two things that are really important about _ make? there are two things that are really important about these - make? there are two things that are really important about these two - really important about these two weeks _ really important about these two weeks. , ., , .,. weeks. the first one is the fact that it is the _ weeks. the first one is the fact that it is the forcing _ weeks. the first one is the fact | that it is the forcing mechanism that it is the forcing mechanism that everyone talks about. when you say different countries and different companies in different stakeholders and we will do our best we might announce that, this is the time they have to do it by. and everybody is watching. that's a really good news. the second thing about this is that people are getting into groups to make this announcement say you have groups of carpets agreeing to net zero or south transparency rules and you have groups of countries that we just had this morning who make ambitious commitments to reducing or coming off coal altogether. so it's an effective way of getting people to be more ambitious while they're so much pressure on them since we are all here. i know there's an element of all my goodness what is best? it's people coming together and there is a fun element to it, different age groups and nationalities. but there's also very serious mix that there are real information being exchanged and the feeling is quite excited, quite optimistic. feeling is quite excited, quite optimistic-— feeling is quite excited, quite otimistic. ., ., ., ,, ., ., optimistic. how do we work out at the end of— optimistic. how do we work out at the end of it _ optimistic. how do we work out at the end of it whether _ optimistic. how do we work out at the end of it whether it's - optimistic. how do we work out at the end of it whether it's been - optimistic. how do we work out at the end of it whether it's been a l the end of it whether it's been a success or not?— the end of it whether it's been a success or not? today, for instance the iea success or not? today, for instance the lea which _ success or not? today, for instance the iea which is — success or not? today, for instance the iea which is run _ success or not? today, for instance the iea which is run by _ success or not? today, for instance the iea which is run by the - the iea which is run by the international energy association which has been really concerned about the lack of activity said the announcement itself i mean the mates kept under two degrees by the end of this century riches quite a good achievement so far because the general evidence is that whatever it is announced and acted on, don't forget acted on has to follow announcements is that the existence of the technology and the movement by the public means that accelerates. so that's good news and this looks like it would be better than people thoughts.— this looks like it would be better than people thoughts. that's a good auestion than people thoughts. that's a good question because _ than people thoughts. that's a good question because i'm _ than people thoughts. that's a good question because i'm turning - than people thoughts. that's a good question because i'm turning my - question because i'm turning my thoughts to what's he going to be like at the end of next week when the 13 or 1a days and you talk to the 13 or 1a days and you talk to the negotiators and say what will you discuss for that last week and they think things like that hundred billion dollars promised from rich countries to poor countries to help them with the transition to green, that's meant to run out in 2025 we need to start talking about what will the process be for deciding what the next round of funding will be for the next five years. and we need to let that artist 7 article six of the paris agreement really work out the agreements of the market and elect 7 how do we calculate the different risk premiums for people building a bridge and you think you know what that does not lead me to think this and debbie olympic style closing ceremony for borisjohnson to coming into this spice girls at the end of next week. are you not worried this will end with a bit of (7 having started with a big bang? will end with a bit of (? having started with a big bang? something could no started with a big bang? something could go wrong _ started with a big bang? something could go wrong of— started with a big bang? something could go wrong of course _ started with a big bang? something could go wrong of course but - started with a big bang? something could go wrong of course but at - started with a big bang? something could go wrong of course but at the| could go wrong of course but at the moment. it might be bad. it feels like there is momentum going in the right direction. i don't think they would be an olympic style ceremony that he was in paris. with his gavel plays, when ecuador stopped the whole thing saying we don't believe in markets, where marxists that we have to really delete but i don't think there will be back to my people have their own way of looking at this to see if their success but if you get people like the iea saying this is good, we're on track if you get people make the green organization saying we're not there yet but this is the right ambition than they will be evidence that he can say this is a success but it's not an opportunity to stop. it's just an opportunity to accelerate. my just an opportunity to accelerate. my own thing i'll be looking for is sufficient evidence that the markets, the money is really going to continue to fund renewables and carbon storage and all the things that need to industrialize countries any greenway. i think a lot of the potential investors are looking at the same either sufficient signals for us and can be really rely on a new green industrial resolution7 and i think that confidence could really create a momentum investment that would be really helpful. if you look at all the strategies that the government has come out with him to build up to the conference which they had to do because they're going to host this conference you have to be green. itla to host this conference you have to be ureen. ., ., , ., be green. no way does it say i as an individual will _ be green. no way does it say i as an individual will have _ be green. no way does it say i as an individual will have to _ be green. no way does it say i as an individual will have to do _ be green. no way does it say i as an individual will have to do anything i individual will have to do anything different — individual will have to do anything different. ls individual will have to do anything different. is that credible or realistic? i think there is an awareness that this screen industrial resolution is going to have _ industrial resolution is going to have certain costs and we are beginning _ have certain costs and we are beginning to see from his last budget— beginning to see from his last budget and spending review that way he is going to get that but i think the public— he is going to get that but i think the public knows there's going to be changes— the public knows there's going to be changes but i think it's not unreasonable and a delicate balance for politicians here. the}r unreasonable and a delicate balance for politicians here.— for politicians here. they want to make sure _ for politicians here. they want to make sure they _ for politicians here. they want to make sure they set _ for politicians here. they want to make sure they set the - for politicians here. they want to | make sure they set the framework for politicians here. they want to - make sure they set the framework to get the outcome that we want and lower carbon emissions but they want to scare horses. there is a famous phrase i sometimes refer to riches politicians know what to do that just don't know how to get reelected after they had done it. so we need to be careful to take everybody with us. . ., to be careful to take everybody with us. ~ ., y ., , to be careful to take everybody with us. would you be comfortable if you are a cabinet — us. would you be comfortable if you are a cabinet minister _ us. would you be comfortable if you are a cabinet minister now, - us. would you be comfortable if you are a cabinet minister now, but - us. would you be comfortable if you are a cabinet minister now, but if. are a cabinet minister now, but if you are _ are a cabinet minister now, but if you are a — are a cabinet minister now, but if you are a cabinet minister now especially— you are a cabinet minister now especially if he's offering you a lift famously. i think the people you need — lift famously. i think the people you need to go for their vegan croissant— you need to go for their vegan croissant which does not taste as nice as _ croissant which does not taste as nice as the — croissant which does not taste as nice as the bacon sandwich because people _ nice as the bacon sandwich because people the — nice as the bacon sandwich because people the scientists say they're going _ people the scientists say they're going to — people the scientists say they're going to eat less meat, would you be comfortable recommending to people that's what we do? no, comfortable recommending to people that's what we do?— that's what we do? no, i would not. when i that's what we do? no, i would not. when i was — that's what we do? no, i would not. when i was growing _ that's what we do? no, i would not. when i was growing up, _ that's what we do? no, i would not. when i was growing up, there - that's what we do? no, i would not. when i was growing up, there was l that's what we do? no, i would not. i when i was growing up, there was one vegetarian _ when i was growing up, there was one vegetarian restaurant around, it was called _ vegetarian restaurant around, it was called cracks. and now it's everywhere. i had not considered my political— everywhere. i had not considered my political career. last night i was at one _ political career. last night i was at one of— political career. last night i was at one of those nice dinners and i looked _ at one of those nice dinners and i looked around and demand on my left and the _ looked around and demand on my left and the man on my right they were both having — and the man on my right they were both having the vegetarian option and it— both having the vegetarian option and it looked a bit nicer than mine. i and it looked a bit nicer than mine. i don't _ and it looked a bit nicer than mine. idon't think— and it looked a bit nicer than mine. idon't think i— and it looked a bit nicer than mine. i don't think i will confess what it was _ i don't think i will confess what it was like — i don't think i will confess what it was. like having the green energy is going _ was. like having the green energy is going to _ was. like having the green energy is going to turn out to be the better thing. _ going to turn out to be the better thing. not — going to turn out to be the better thing, notjust the right thing. what — thing, notjust the right thing. what i — thing, notjust the right thing. what i ponder what may or may not have been on your dinner plate last night let's talk about the prime minister. you know him well from being in government and the brexit debates in all of that. let's talk about all things boris johnson debates in all of that. let's talk about all things borisjohnson and agreed. he sounds like the greenest activist you ever bumped into. he has not always been like that. masha. has not always been like that. now, he has not- — has not always been like that. now, he has not- he _ has not always been like that. now, he has not. he has _ has not always been like that. now, he has not. he has the _ has not always been like that. now, he has not. he has the zeal- has not always been like that. now, he has not. he has the zeal of- has not always been like that. now, he has not. he has the zeal of the i he has not. he has the zeal of the conference — he has not. he has the zeal of the conference. and it's great. those of us who— conference. and it's great. those of us who really do want this to happen have been— us who really do want this to happen have been talking about it for a while — have been talking about it for a while we — have been talking about it for a while. we canjust about have been talking about it for a while. we can just about the have been talking about it for a while. we canjust about the mix. 1 while. we canjust about the mix. i will while. we canjust about the mix. will go to while. we canjust about the mix. i will go to bed now because i have while. we canjust about the mix. i will go to bed now because i have to get up early tomorrow because i'm told will get one of the first kind of good assessments of how successful pop has been already for some people staying up all night working out all the pledges so thank you to amber. i working out all the pledges so thank you to amber-— you to amber. i hope you have good news tomorrow, _ you to amber. i hope you have good news tomorrow, something - you to amber. i hope you have good news tomorrow, something to - you to amber. i hope you have good news tomorrow, something to build | news tomorrow, something to build upon _ news tomorrow, something to build upon and _ news tomorrow, something to build upon. and goodbye. have a marvelous second _ upon. and goodbye. have a marvelous second week— upon. and goodbye. have a marvelous second week in our home city, looking — second week in our home city, looking glorious in the organizer is waiting _ looking glorious in the organizer is waiting very nervously for when it's going _ waiting very nervously for when it's going to _ waiting very nervously for when it's going to rain on all those people standing — going to rain on all those people standing outside for a hour and a half but — standing outside for a hour and a half but they brought us ? lots and lots. half but they brought us ? lots and lots the _ half but they brought us ? lots and lots. the die. hello. eastern england saw the lion's share of the sunshine today after a frosty start. milder air has been pushing in across the west of the uk with a lot of cloud so northern ireland has been mainly cloudy. although there hasn't been much in the way of rain out of this cloud but things are now about to change as we get into the weekend. there's an area of low pressure heading our way which is notjust some rain but some stronger winds with it. it will turn windy across the uk but particularly in northern scotland by the end of saturday, saturday night and into sunday morning. and rain will move south across the uk but it will weaken as it does so. it is largely dry for bonfire night. just a few spots of rain into the west. but more persistent rain overnight and into the morning across the north northwest scotland the wind picking up as well. it's a much milder night and of course we will notice that where there is the first to start the day today. overnight and into tomorrow it is wet in northwest scotland and the rain tomorrow is going to move its way south across scotland through northern ireland, into northern england most persistent to the west of the pennines and to wales as well late morning and into the afternoon. for the midlands, east anglia and southern england a lot of cloud, a few brighter breaks, a few splashes of rain especially into the evening there will be increasingly light and patchy rain moving through. scotland and northern ireland brightening up in the afternoon, temperatures around ten to lg celsius. a windier day across the board. fireworks displays tomorrow evening take note of the wind. especially in northern scotland, these are some of the dust as we go into the evening. the severe gales developing around some of the coast of northern scotland, gusts of 60 to 70 miles an hour coupled with high tide could well bring big waves in dangerous conditions into sunday morning before these winds gradually ease during the day along with all of these blustery showers. a few other showers across mainly western areas on sunday, one or two may trickle a little further east but they'll be some sunny spells especially in the eastern part. overall sunday is looking likely dryer brighter day of the two into the weekend. temperatures stay on the mild side going into next week there'll be some rain at times, more especially across northern and western parts of the uk. not much reaching towards the south and east. tonight at ten... yorkshire county cricket club is engulfed by the racism row — the biggest crisis in its history. the controversy over the club's response to the racist harassment experienced by former player azeem rafiq has prompted its chairman to step down. what i have seen is a culture that is locked in the past. a culture that finds it difficult to challenge and change. former england captain michael vaughan was accused of making a racist comment to players — something he denies. the bbc says he won't be presenting his cricket programme next week. also on the programme tonight... thousands of young climate activists march through the streets of glasgow outside cop26, led by the swedish campaigner greta thunberg. we have had 26 cops.