It should be safe to say that the United States is finally starting to move past Covid-19 as herd immunity nears closer and closer. The debate over whether lockdowns were a good pandemic response has been raging since day one with each side attempting to grasp at whatever immediate evidence is available.
The overwhelming evidence at this point seems to suggest that after controlling for various outliers, most sweeping policy responses like stay-at-home orders and business closures have very little correlation with stopping Covid-19. After factoring in the economic and social damage of lockdown policies, the case for their long-term use becomes untenable. This fact has been hinted at almost since the beginning of the pandemic and increasingly confirmed by the latest data.
May 12, 2021
Anthony Fauci, leading leftists, and their malicious band of media mouthpieces have all been sticking their fingers in the dike of the lockdown strategy. But as the data blows holes in the idea of lockdown inerrancy and the science gushes out, the ruling class is getting swept up in the current of their own failures, flailing at their opponents in a desperate attempt to divert blame.
For more than a year, proponents and opponents of COVID-19 lockdowns have played tug of war over safety and freedom, with both camps declaring fealty to science despite opposite messages. Thanks to the ruling class who insisted shutting down would save lives, that became the conventional wisdom. Fauci, President Joe Biden, and their allies in the media called for nationwide lockdowns, with Biden condemning Trump for leaving the decision to states and Fauci saying this time last year, “I don’t understand why” a nationwide stay-at-home order isn’t happening.
email article There is only this way that we have established over the months of performing together, and what it is congruent with isn t ourselves but past performances we re has-beens at heart, routinely trotting out the old, old act. Philip Roth,
The Counterlife
The counterfactual is a term for what would have happened if not for some intervention, action, or policy. Here, I want to explore the COVID-19 counterlife. What would have happened if. Obviously, this is an act of imagination, but anchored by over 10 years of studying science, medicine, and policy, and how people respond.
So, what would have happened if.
DECLARATION OF CANADIAN PHYSICIANS FOR SCIENCE AND TRUTH ON COVID-19 POLICY
The Declaration
We are a broad and diverse group of Canadian physicians from across Canada who are sending out this urgent declaration to the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of our various Provinces and Territories and to the Public at large, whom we serve.
On April 30, 2021, Ontario’s physician licensing body, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO), issued a statement forbidding physicians from questioning or debating any or all of the official measures imposed in response to COVID-19.
1
We regard this recent statement of the CPSO to be unethical, anti-science and deeply disturbing.
Sat, 08 May 2021 02:00 UTC
A new Vaccination Demand Observatory is using surveillance, bots, and behavior change mass marketing schemes to press reluctant people into getting the shots
The U.S. is awash in a surplus of coronavirus vaccines as there has been a sudden in drop in demand for them; most Americans who want the shots have had them. Now an army of Big Biotech s agencies set up to address vaccine hesitancy are turning up their mass marketing to create demand using surveillance, rapid data analysis, media control, and host of behavior control strategies they ve outlined in their playbooks.
Demand plummets