ino sh a spirited debate. it was easier to shut down unwelcome speechspeech, and writ all off as misinformation. they were trying protect you, america. the only way we get past amer is if we arerefu careful about what we say and we use a power that we have to limitwhat w spread of that misinformation. my hope is that facebook, instead of taking it personally, that somehow i m saying facebook is telling people that they would do something about the misinformation or depending on the sociainl giants, to take down untruths and things of this sort. huntee downr biden, this lapp that intelligence officials have warneat inteld is likely rn disinformation. pr the golden oldies only much of what they were protecting you from durinotg election cycls turned out to be true. now the censorship squad has i been exposed and a bombshell ruling on july 4th. a federal judge in louisiana has blocke has bd the federal government from contacting or comeeting with media giants.ns it turns o
debate it was easier to shut down unwelcomed speech and write it all off as misinformation. they were trying to protect you, america. the only way we get passed misinformation is to be careful what we say and use the power we have to stop the spread of misinformation. my hope is facebook taking it personally, i m saying facebook is killing people, that they do something about the misinformation. relying on the social media giant to take down mistruths. hunter biden, this laptop that intelligence officials have warned is likely russian disinformation. raymond: the golden oldies. only much of what they were protecting you from during two election cycles turned out to be true. now the censorship squad has been exposed in a bombshell ruling on july 4th a federal judge in louisiana has blocked the federal government from contacting or meeting with social media giants. it turns out, the government has been targeting and censoring speech they disagree with for years. in a
impose criminal penalties for sitting, sleeping or lying outside on public property for homeless individuals who cannot obtain shelter. it held at the ordinances were unconstitutional and constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment. the matter came before the powerful 9th circuit court, which has jurisdiction for the western united states and all of california. the ninth circuit has been regarded as a progressive bastion, but president trump was able to appoint ten judges to the ninth circuit. it limited what idaho could do with regard to its homeless. this time a three-judge panel similarly ruled against a city s effort to regulate its homeless population. when grants pass then sought to have the matter considered by the entire circuit, it could not get the required vote from all a act tiff members of the bench. that s when all hell broke lose. the denial of a full review drew 16 dissents and many statements. as the oregonen reported, many who dissent
which is more cruel and unusual? one of the most influential appellate courts erupted in public disagreement over one of the most difficult issues of our time, homelessness. having recently decided matters of affirmative action, student loans and adoption, on top of last year s rulings concerning abortion, guns, religion and climate change, scotus might soon have the final word here, too. at issue, ordinances in grants pass, oregon, which would impose fines on homeless people for encampment on public property. a trial court was faced with this issue, whether cities can impose criminal penalties for sitting, sleeping or lying outside on public property for homeless individuals who cannot obtain shelter. it held the ordinances were unconstitutional and constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment. the matter came before the powerful ninth circuit court, which has jurisdiction for much of the western united states and all of california. the ninth circuit
that s just kidding. all right. well, we re going to talk about we have a lot to say abouts yo t we re going to joke about, that you and i, and we have we have something planned. concongratulations, anyway. thank you. all right. hannity thanks so muchu we wil we ll pick it up where you left off. i am laura ingraham. this is the angry man from washingtonashington tonigh tonit . and we have some big news to share with you later in the show. and you don t want to missdoo ms but first,, liars and stinkers.i nkthat s the focus of tonight s angle. e my i ve never spoken to my son son about anything. i ve never my business or their business, my sons or daughters and i ve nevery discussed them because they know where i have to do, n. my job and that s it. and they have to make their own judgments. a grhe s a grown man.he and it turns out he did not do a single thing wrong. f cour now, of course, no onese, not a single adult with any normal brain activity, believes this. the l