To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
In many jurisdictions, now that guidelines for social distancing and wearing masks are better understood, trial courts remain open to receive new cases. In the Circuit Courts of Maryland and Virginia, plaintiffs and defendants are filing motions, conducting discovery, and preparing for trial. There is just one little catch, in many jurisdictions, civil jury trials that may have already been pending for years are not likely to occur until sometime in 2022. Parties become concerned that their evidence may go stale, memories fade, and witnesses move away, but the case is still open, and justice has not been done. If you need assistance with the litigation process, hiring an experienced attorney can be beneficial in navigating the road ahead.
Western Togoland case adjourned to April 20
modernghana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from modernghana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
EEOC Argues For Broader Causation Standard And Provides A Peek Into The EEOC s Future Focus | Jackson Lewis P C
jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Tuesday, February 23, 2021
certiorariin
CareAlternatives v. United States (
CareAlternatives), a case on appeal from the Third Circuit that could have assessed the issue of “objective falsity” under the federal False Claims Act (FCA). The Supreme Court’s rejection leaves standing the split among Circuit Courts on whether a whistleblower (Relator) must prove that a claim is objectively false in order to bring a successful FCA claim. This means that health care providers potentially face differing levels of FCA risk depending on where an FCA case is brought.
As we have previously discussed, federal courts are split on whether Relators must prove objective falsity. Both
On Monday February 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant
certiorari in
CareAlternatives v. United States (
CareAlternatives), a case on appeal from the Third Circuit that could have assessed the issue of “objective falsity” under the federal False Claims Act (FCA). The Supreme Court’s rejection leaves standing the split among Circuit Courts on whether the government or a whistleblower (Relator) must prove that a claim is objectively false to bring a successful FCA claim. This means that health care providers potentially face differing levels of FCA risk depending on the jurisdiction where an FCA case is brought.
As we have previously discussed, federal courts are split on whether Relators or the government must prove objective falsity. Both