July 16, 2021
NEW DELHI: Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday said messages exchanged on social media platform have no evidential value and that the author of such WhatsApp messages cannot be tied to them, especially in business partnerships governed by agreements.
According to a media report, a bench of Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justices A S Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy said, “What is evidential value of WhatsApp messages these days? Anything can be created and deleted on social media these days. We don’t attach any value to the WhatsApp messages.”
Meanwhile, amid an ongoing standoff with the Centre over its privacy policy, WhatsApp on Friday told the Delhi High Court that it has decided to “temporarily put its privacy policy on hold , till the Data Protection Bill comes into force.
Indian court closes case against Italian marines - English
ansa.it - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ansa.it Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Indian court closes case against Italian marines
lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.it - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lagazzettadelmezzogiorno.it Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
April 9, 2021 11:49:47 am
The Indian Supreme Court on Thursday denied relief in a petition challenging the detention of nearly 150 Rohingya refugees in Jammu and the government’s proposed move to deport them to Myanmar. The order was made with respect to an interlocutory application filed by the petitioners pending disposal of their main writ petition of 2017 that seeks basic human amenities for the Rohingya refugees in India.
The petitioners had argued the principle of non-refoulement is part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution that is available to non-citizens as well. They also relied on international law covenants ratified by India such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child 1992 to argue that non-refoulement is a binding obligation on the Indian state.