The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows the board requests that you turn all our cell phones or Electronic Devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. Appellants and respondents are each given seven minutes to present their cases and three minutes for rebuttal. Members of the public who are not affiliated with the parties have three minutes each and no rebuttal. Time may be limited if the agenda is long or if there is a large number of speakers. For rehearing requests. The parties are given three minutes each with no rebutt al. Four votes are required to grant an appeal, modify any determination or grant a rehearing request. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, proceedings, or appeals, please contact the board. Sfgov is broadcasting and streaming this item live, and we will have opportunity to offer Public Comment on every item on the agenda. It will be rebroadcast on fridays on channel 26. A link to the website is found on our website, sfgov. Org boa. You can
The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows the board requests that you turn all our cell phones or Electronic Devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. Appellants and respondents are each given seven minutes to present their cases and three minutes for rebuttal. Members of the public who are not affiliated with the parties have three minutes each and no rebuttal. Time may be limited if the agenda is long or if there is a large number of speakers. For rehearing requests. The parties are given three minutes each with no rebutt al. Four votes are required to grant an appeal, modify any determination or grant a rehearing request. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, proceedings, or appeals, please contact the board. Sfgov is broadcasting and streaming this item live, and we will have opportunity to offer Public Comment on every item on the agenda. It will be rebroadcast on fridays on channel 26. A link to the website is found on our website, sfgov. Org boa. You can
Our hoist machine is located overhead, and this is a traction machine, so it is an evolution beyond the winding from elevator. This is the drive ship. This is the gear box, and this is original from 1913. It is a heavyduty design that we really do not see any more today. That is probably part of the reason why this elevator has already lasted close to 100 years. This is the break for the voice machine teh brake. We have the original controller here. Fortunately, the power is turned off. This room was built in 1913, but the National Elevator cut actually was not introduced until 1921. Tell us about this antique controller. What makes it different from a modern controller . The elevator is running on the original d. C. Power. Really simple in operation. Does not include a lot of the features we would have in an elevator today, Automatic Door operation, dispatching, push button operation. None of those features are present, but this is the original from 1913. On this side, we have all the
Not disturb the proceedings. Appellants, permit holders and Department Respondents are given 7 minutes to present the case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must include the comments within the 7 or 3 minute periods. Members of public who are not affiliated have up to 3 minutes to address the board and no eare buttal. Time may be limited to 2 minutes if the agenda is long or if there are a large number of speakers. The rehearing requests the parties are given three minutes each with no eare buttal. Our legal assistant will give you a verbal warning 30 seconds before the time is up. Four votes are required to grant an appeal, modify a permit or other city determination or grant a rehearing request. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, the board rules or hearing schedules, email board staff at board of appeals at sfgov. Org. Public participation is very important to the board and every effort has been made to replicate the inperson hearing proc
Now, the property at 1215, 29th avenue is developed a Single Family home. Its quite long and dense and it only provide an overview and be available for any questions. The first enforcement action regarding units on this property was a d. B. I. Complaint from the ground floor in 1999. That enforcement process moved slowly. There were other compliments filed over several years. The Property Owner filed a new Building Permit in 2014, nine years later to remove the unit. That permit was issued but never completed. Theres no evidence or documentation that the two illegal units were actually removed. Planning Department Engagement began in 2018 when the complaint was filed. The department obtained documents from 2011 and 2014 that clearly described two illegal units out ground floor, which at that time that the Property Owner did not dispute they were working with d. B. I. To remove those illegal units. In 30day notice for owner movein in 2018, the landlord stated she was occupying in illega