price of prescription drugs in order to negotiate, which would actually help a lot of people who need drugs. also raise taxes on corporations as well as rich high-earning individuals who the administration and manchin agree can. kate bedingfield making time at a very busy moment. thanks for being here. of course. thanks for having me. absolutely. our setup was quicker than usual, because we d be quoting the white house, but we have the white house, so bottom line, one, what does this all do? and two, the big question, how does this president get the senator, manchin, back on board? well, what is this all do? does an enormous amount for families all across the country. it tackles the climate crisis in a meaningful and urgent and frankly historic way. it s going to lower the cost of prescription drugs, the cost of health-care, and it s going to rewrite the tax code so corporations have to pay their fair share, and people making under $400,000 a year are not going to see a
Good morning. When ourfree range eggs are not free range . Well, when the hens are kept inside to stop them from getting bird flu. From tomorrow, new labels will appear on your packs. I will have all the details. It in sport, no problem for leicester. The faltering champions record their First Premier League victory of 2017 with a 3 1 win over liverpool. And carol has the weather. Good morning. A cold start to the day with the risk of ice but for many of us it is dry. However, showers in the west and through the course of the day they will cross into england and wales depositing snow on the hills. First, our main story. A bbc investigation has revealed there were more than 20,000 allegations of abuse made against Home Care Workers over the past three years. Many of the cases involved neglect but there were also allegations of physical, psychological and sexual abuse. The uk Home Care Association has described the findings as horrifying but warns the system is under extreme pressure. Br
response. you know, look, what s interesting about this, and we were just talking about this all these people, who had nothing to say when donald trump was being impeached for these very same things, people who kept their mouths shut, despite what we know they knew now, and despite how dangerous it was, now coming to the committee and making we don t know what they ll say, but given what we ve heard already, we ve already heard facts that are going to be evidence that put donald trump right in the center of a conspiracy. some thing people learned through these processes is something lawyers fixate on, sometimes too much, which is process. but when you control process and rules, you have a lot more control over outcome. so is there an instant replay or not? you make that question, that s going to depend on what you think you re going to benefit from, and that s why lawyers obsess over rules.
not a middle ground? i like the idea of mark meadows going to jail for the rest of his life, but i think the committee laid out the person on top of all this, in charge of all this, doing all this was donald trump. so i think indictments need to land at his doorstep for there to be a sense of justice. however, if we at least get to meadows getting to meadows, i won t call that nothing. that will be something. every single indictment counts, every single one. and every single indictment get you closer to more indictments, and we know that, including flipping witnesses. i do agree with ellie. i don t see a situation or scenario where if you re following the evidence you don t land at a serious investigation of donald trump, and the department of justice should do what it should do, which is investigate rigorously, follow the evidence, and bring all the charges it can based on that evidence. i think you both make great points, i will add, in fairness to mr. meadows work don t have
i would say what is particularly pivotal was cassidy hutchinson, because she brought evidence that, at least from public reporting we know they did not have because that is not the way they were investigating this case, right? and we didn t know about the ketchup. and we didn t so they that actually put it quite squarely in the court of investigating donald trump directly. but can i just say one thing? i m going to give it back to you, but it was also after cassidy hutchinson we learned some people at doj had to play catch-up with the committee. the question is i want to give credit to the department of justice here, because i m not quite as negative as my friend. is that the fake elector the denial dj was investigating fake electors, that was going to take them to trump. i do think cassidy hutchinson