The press conference just wrapped up about 15 minutes ago. The San Francisco Police Department did the best they could to update the media what motivated jimmy lam. Even though the suspect jimmy lam instead, this investigation is open. Heres what they told us this afternoon. They told us its not clear why he targeted those three victims. He did disclose that jimmy lam used to stolen guns. One a mac 10 which was stolen in utah and also a semi automatic pistol which was stolen in napa. They found the backpack with a round of ammunition and they told us that only the mac 10 was used in the shooting. This mac 10 held 20 rounds in a magazine. As for how jimmy lam was able to get the weapons into a secure facility , police would only say those rest with ups. Have you guys determine how he got into the facility with two firearms . Jimmy lam is an employee of ups and was in the building for employment purposes. Any information that we have as to where he came in and the security and the magnet
Answer period, please step up to the microphone next to the podium so they can get your question on the recording. Please make sure that it is, in fact, a question. Normally, when we finish an event, we ask you to fold up your chairs and put them against a book shelf. Please leave them where we are, as we have three more events this afternoon. As mr. Randall is finished talking and finished with the question and answer, hed be happy to answer questions. The line will start to the right of the podium. Mr. Randall details the 50 years and persistent attempts by the british to control american trade waters and how in spite of in the United States ultimately becomes the Worlds Largest independent maritime power. Publishers weekly said of the book revisiting such famous events as the chesapeake affair in which a british ship fired on and mustered an american crew, randall brings to life the violent skirmishes that played out in the name of trade on sea, lake and land. His account helps eluc
Back so i think theres a general consensus now this conflict is generational, its a different kind of conflict its not one where you can say you can walk away fromthis because we want. The enemy, this enemy has decided to keep fighting. You can watch this and other programsonline at booktv. Org. [inaudible conversation] hello everyone. Thank you so much for coming out tonight. Im part of the event staff here and on behalf of the staff and our owners we are honored to welcome you to host john simpson for his book the word detectives. Searching for it all at the meeting of the oxford dictionary and a few housekeeping notes for us to get started. Take out the cell phones and noisemaking devices and silence those at this time so we dont have any unnecessary interruption, that would be great. We will also mention that we are on book tv is here today and they will be filming the event and we are doing our own reporting as well so john is going to come us about a half hour we will have anothe
States are making very different sorts of calculations from people who are born here. I guess im not spin clarion. I think theres probably a lot more hope than just saying its culture. And, of course, the other thing is once you say its all culture, thats kind of like, its a big thing and its kind of like we cant talk about that. I think we can talk about this. What do you make of the increase of the labor force increase in alderman . And women, too. I think its terrific. I think its really the single glimmer of sunshine we see in the labor market over the past 25 years, this turn up from the 55 plus group. Its what should happen with a more educated, more healthy american population. When all these guys to and 56 they would to work . If you look at jason and the work on the age of cohort by cohort, we would have to lift and a lot of hope for that. So there were two questions that were actually union yang questions. One is to adjust cut these guys off . The other is if theyre not going
Include i had a piece of information that bob woodward wanted. I didnt articulate to myself. But when i looked back and i asked myself why i did this bad and stupid thing. I think thats what it comes down to. Sunday night, Georgetown University professor talks about working as a researcher and government writer for Hillary Clinton and bob woodward in her ook. I resisted. I spoke in general terms what it was like being in the white house and i told them the story about being in the room during this unusual exercise. I told them you cant use it. There were only these two women in the room who were doing this. These two guests and one or two staffers and mrs. Clinton. If you use it, everybody will know that i was the source. And i was very worried about that. But i trusted them. Sunday night at 8 00 p. M. Eastern on cspan. For the next hour, American History tv exclusive. Our cities tour visits harrisburg, pennsylvania to learn more about its unique history. For five years we traveled to