it will protect him legally. think of this as the whole thing, the trump campaign, the hacking by the russians as a jigsaw puzzle with 10,000 pieces. bob mueller has 9800. who has the other 200? some of them donald trump has. does donald trump want to help paint this picture for bob mueller? of course not. ainsley: there is a report that says obama intelligence officials, including john brennan and james clapper are the next targets in the investigation into the politicization. steve: the nunes probe. ainsley: politicization. brian: on the house intelligence committee. ainsley: anti-trump dossier. judge: in my opinion that s relied on the stea on the steelr and michael isikoff s yahoo piece. if you read the yahoo piece it begins by saying high ranking intelligence officials told me. who do you think they were?
reliable. the only problem with that was the yahoo piece was itself based on leaked information from steel. it have to be utterly incompetent to do something like that or, totally dishonest. meanwhile the man identified, and he is carter page. this application repeatedly describes you as an agent of the russian government. and are you aware of any criminal charges pending against you, do you expect to be charged for working for the russian government? not only am i not aware of it, also the fact that there is no question i have ever been asked, and none of those don t
the fisa application doesn t even begin to prove that carter page began to betray his country in any way that the application does other things. we now know that the dossier was central to the obama administration s request to the spy on the campaign.n. he perhaps assumed the actual request would never be released. comey claims that dossier was a not a significant part of the request which turned out to be a lie. it appears the fbi did essentially nothing to verify the claims of the dossier, despite the fact that he knew that it was a partisan document paid for by political operatives. the hillary clinton campaign and at the dnc.iv it was too good to check apparently.e instead of sending its own agents to run down the facts which it could have done, the fbi instead sent a yahoo news article to prove the dossier was reliable. the only problem with that was the yahoo piece was itself based