no doubt cleotha abston is involved in this case. jackie ibanez with major details, jackie. this is turning into an incredibly scary story. an unidentified body found for a missing mother of two eliza fletcher. authorities uncovered a body during their search for the billionaire heiress in a heavily wooded area just 7 miles where fletcher was last seen in a mile from where the suspect with his car close. the police have not confirmed the identity or cause of death. cleotha abston setrst hearing ls morning. the convicted felon is facing additional charges for identity theft after reportedly stealing a woman s cash wrap and gas card the day before fletcher went missing. . as the suspect s uncle tells news outlets, he is 100% sure he had something to do with her abduction. my whole family is wacky. they are all perpetrators of something. she set out for her job when she was attacked near the university of memphis. she was reported missing by her husband just before 8:00 in th
I think the salient points made by our memo still exist and they are still true. A little bit of it is creating so much dust and clout that people just give up and saying, you are saying that, i am just going to tune out. That may be part of it too. Martha it seems like one of the Big Bones Of Contention would be whether or not it was essential to the fisa surveillance. You have argued that it was essential, that without it, they would have not received the authorization for the warrant from the fisa court. Do they have you said that there is other information about carter page. You said they are basically three things. You have yahoo news article, the dossier, and other information about carter page. Can they argue that other information was substantial enough . They didnt make that argument to the judge. If you have enough without the dossier, then why did you
include the dossier . If you have enough without the dossier, why did you, in your court filing, lead with the dossier . Lawy
Consensus reached after multiple days and meetings among officials. We reviewed Department Policies and concluded Assistant Director pre steps exercise of description in opening the investigation was in compliance with those policies. We also reviewed, as we detail in the report, the emails, Text Messages and other documents of those involved in that decision, particularly mr. Pre steps. We didnt find documentary or Testimonial Evidence that indicated political bias or improper motivation influencing his decision to open the investigation. While the information in the fbis possession at the time was limited, in light of the Throw Threshold established by department and fbi predication policy which, by the way, is not a legal requirement but a prudential one in the fbi and Department Policies, we found that Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized
investigative purpose and with sufficient factual predication. This decision to open Crossfire Hurricane which involved the activitie
biden s business dealings. correspondent sarah, age is not an elected official but legitimate question should be asked and answered about business dealings and how it was handled by the fbi. this should not be a partisan issue. the tweet shared yahoo news article about counterintelligence questions raised by the sons past including leading hunter to potential influence operation be counterintelligence threat to the country. john will return to the president as white house senior advisor for clean energy innovation. and you remember podesta, the campaign chair. the campaign officials emails leaked prior to 2016 election rebilling things like in close coordination with media and obama administration as well as bernie sanders. john podesta said looks to revamp its claimant and claimant advisor jan mccarthy to step down later this month.
whether he was a source for the september 2016 yahoo news article that cited western intelligence sources, quote, unquote? if not, why not? they did not ask that question despite having the opportunity to do so. we got a variety of explanations including as to some of these issues that they didn t want to offend him or jeopardize their relationship with him. question two. on october 11th draft of the fisa application stating the fbi believed steel was the source for the yahoo news article but it was taken out in the october 14th draft. why did the fbi originally say steel was the source, and what factual basis did the fbi have to change that and tell the court that steel was not a source? this is what was so