having a transnational bodyvictz to pick victims and victimizers. it s going to be staffedpeople eventually by people like venezuela, nicaragua, cuba, that are not constitutional system. and you know what that s going s o to lead to ? oh, i do what we have now.. tha davis hanson, thank you so much for that dark but accurate portrait. thank you. appreciate it. itt bes hard to believe this story is real, but it is in l manyik ways like it are real. there are a lot of victims of january 6th. they w, they re not all is phantom police officers supposedly murdered? they were protest who have been treated as political prisoners ,including one man who was arrested on january six for doing nothing violent and then denied enie cancer treatment in prison for months.ld and while being held on these ridiculous charges, his cancer progressed from stage one to straight aheadthree . that man s fiancee joins us straight ahead. but that was good.
laura: no story is it more obvious than two stories, the way they have covered this president and when you see when nbc got that access hollywood tape, they w never explain how the washington post or why it suddenly ended up withhe the washington post. they went with the story. the reporter who leaked it turned out to be a close friend of the head of the news division, noah oppenheim from harvard. i know what happened, he moved that tape and leaked it to the washington post to his friend and they fired billy bush it was a hapless bystander because he was in the way. one of the worst things i have ever seen happen, they never copped to it, never did an internal investigation, they covered it up. laura: this is where it becomes obvious, it s so critical in what you do every night i would say this to tucker if i didn t work at fox can lead
and now is it the solicitation statute. doesn t it have to fit some kind of law that the american people will understand? it has to be understandable to the american people because impeachment and conviction of political acts conducted by the two houses, but they re not locked in to defining a crime consistent with what s already been passed in the united states code or some criminal statute that exists, right. they can define it differently, they can articulate it differently. s they w that s why when peope talk about obstruction of congress, that s in an effort to obstruct impeachment inquiry, which is different. so you re in a different the right way to think about this, in my opinion, is you ve got to think about it in terms of the constitution itself and not be wrapped around any particular statute. this is just the indictment
for his border wall, but she and the president suggested they re waiting to see what the president can come up r with. we have other ways that we can get to that 5 billion that they will work with congress if they w make sure that we get a bill passed that provides not just these funding for the wall but there s adi piece of legislation that s been pushed around that democrats actually voted 26-5 out of committee that provides 26 roughly $26 billion in border security, including 1.6 billion for the wall. that s somethingn that we woul be able to support as longs as we can come that with other fundingit resources to help us g to the 5 billion. with we want to see what the senate cano pass. they ve thrown out a lot of ideas. the shutdown? see what happens. well, you say that, but too early to say. despite the optimism from the white house, the senate s republican and democratic leaders still seem divided on
there united message at the house republicans were running on because honestly i m not sure. you know i think going in it was clearly the economy that was the main focus because economy is doing really well. thing is that wasn t enough, with anden frankly the democrats didde a good job of going out ad lying i would argue and you know we, in fact, we were lying that we were trying to take away preexisting coverage but that s where they wept and tried to put people on defense and they have a lot of money behind that too. they w heavily outraised us ther base was very motivated i ll say this when president got engaged, we actually did really well in terms of bringing our base to a higher level of turnout too, and typically off year election doesn t do so well on turnout we saw very high, high percentage turnout this time around. but ultimately i do think that our message wasn t sharp enough or just enough to be for the economy. i think we should have gotten into a a more direct back