count rirks i have called that terrorism over and over, again. that being said, tucker, i agree with you. itself a mistake to say that yesterday and the reason is what you just said which is we have now had a year of democrats and the media twisting words, and trying to say that all of us are terrorists. backs in the corner. tucker giving that quizzical look he practices so hard. and then, he had to he did the twist, hoping that by blaming the media, blaming democrats, carlson would get back on his side. didn t work. according to cnn s daniel dale, ted cruz called the capitol assault a terrorist attack at least 17 previous times in official written statements, and tweets, and remarks at senate hearings and in interviews. but the issue isn t his hypocrisy, really, only his abject subordination of himself. a sitting-u.s. senator. one of only 100. someone with actual influence a former-presidential candidate, nonetheless, groveling at the feet of tucker carlson. which is quite a com
for the death of gabby petito. written statements by him claiming picture for the death. the fbi announcing today new information that a revolver was found near brian laundrie s body. we few last fall he had taken his life near his family home. now we have learneded that a revolver was found nearby. regarding the notebook. we knew it was in decent condition. the question was, what was inside it? certainly the petito family was hoping for answers about what happened to their daughter. the question is, what are those details? we don t know what he wrote besides taking responsibility. did he say it was an accident, intention am, why or where this happened? also, it s important to note that the coroner last fall when he found the cause of death for gabby, the cornerner wyoming, he said it was homicide by manual
the goal was and the announcement was that this vote on both of these bills could happen as early as tuesday, that being a vote on the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill as well as the $1.75 trillion economic package, that they would go together. well, now we are hearing, my colleague daniellea diaz, a potential delay here. saying we have made extensive progress on prescription drugs and others that were not in the text. at this point we will need additional time to craft language and get final agreement with all parties involved. this language was supposed to go today rules committee on monday. that is now being pushed back and this vote will also be pushed back. we will see how this all unfolds. there are three criteria that have to happen. first, the progressive democrats
are looking for reassurances from those moderate senators that, yes, they are on board, that they will vote for the language, the text of this much bigger bill, the social spending bill. they are asking for explicit language, written statements. senator bernie sanders saying over the weekend. secondly, they want both of these bills to be voted in tandem. that is back on the plate here. that was not the case on thursday when house speaker nancy pelosi called for the vote for the infrastructure bill. now they say they will do that together, check that box. of course, the most difficult thing for progressive democrats, to let go of some of those policy priority initiatives that were a part of the negotiations and a part of that bill. part of that is going to be regarding family and medical paid leave, whether or not that survives and also whether or not medicare will be able to negotiate with drug companies about lowering drug prices.