president getting a big vote of confidence from the university despite major backlash over congressional testimony concerning anti-semitism on campus attracting widespread outrage. the university released a statement of support and right now we re waiting to hear from house republican conference chair elise stefanik with a couple of fiery exchanges with dr. gay at that hearing. she is scheduled to speak in moments. right now the push to impeach president biden taking a major step forward. the house rules committee is meeting this hour preparing a measure to formalize the impeachment inquiry into president biden setting up the resolution for a vote by the full house as early as tomorrow. welcome to a new hour of america s newsroom, i m dana perino. we start with a bang. bill: yes, we do. we saw that coming, didn t we? i m bill hemmer. good morning at home. it now appears house republicans have the votes to authorize what is called an impeachment inquiry. house speaker mike
congress should have oversight and hold hearings, he played himself, took off his mask as an objective special counsel, and shoetd himself to be a political operative. swhn i watched the 9 1/2 minutes, gregg jarrett, i don t think he wrote it. i don t think he did. he didn t write the report either, it was written by committee, two committee, james quarrels side, the reasonable side, felt as if no collusion and not obstruction of justice. the other side was andrew weissmann s side. sean: we learned today did the hiring for mueller. absolutely. weissmann would find a crime if you just walk down the street. sean: is weissmann the one that was held in the book, if i recall correctly, known on withhold exculpatory evidence? and threaten with its, called on the carpet, reversed, rebuked by higher courts. this is a guy who should never be a lawyer or a prosecutor.
congress and suggesting that congress should have oversight and hold hearings, he played himself, took off his mask as an objective special counsel, and shoetd himself to be a political operative. swhn i watched the 9 1/2 minutes, gregg jarrett, i don t think he wrote it. i don t think he did. he didn t write the report either, it was written by committee, two committee, james quarrels side, the reasonable side, felt as if no collusion and not obstruction of justice. the other side was andrew weissmann s side. sean: we learned today did the hiring for mueller. absolutely. weissmann would find a crime if you just walk down the street. sean: is weissmann the one that was held in the book, if i recall correctly, known on withhold exculpatory evidence? and threaten with its, called on the carpet, reversed, rebuked by higher courts. this is a guy who should never be a lawyer or a prosecutor.
was an echo of their desire. let s debate. jennifer granholm and rick santorum. rick an especially valued guest as a former u.s. senator. you were not asked to sign on to this letter but would you have? no. but i think it tells you something that i wasn t asked to sign on to this letter. if you look at the 10 republicans who signed on the letter, all very good people, friends of mine but they are not i would say conservative republicans or supporters of the president so that s number one. number two, the fact that they didn t reach out beyond a group of folks who are anti-trump gives you more perspective on this. and the other thing what does this letter say? it looks like a letter that maybe was put together or the idea was put together to call on the senate to go after trump or the do something but it looks like a letter written by committee. they couldn t come up with anything other than stand for god and country but it says nothing so i don t know really what this is about. is it
generations, and we are way behind. nobody knows that better than you, carly, given your role in the whole silicon valley technology world, but you just mentioned something about the need for us to be safer. what do you think about president trump blasting often our intelligence agencies? you ve actually served on committees. you kw the importance. you know how hard those people work. do you worry when you see a president-elect doing that kind of stuff? i think clapper, the outgoing head of dni said it very well. it s one thing to be skeptical and to question. because the thing is about intelligence, if you read an intelligence report, there is lots of conflicting evidence. and frequently, the summary to an intelligence report, the thing that drives headlines has been written by committee, and it s filled with agendas, some of which are political. so you actually have to get into the details of the report. so when clapper said skepticism is one thing, disparagement is another.