political movie, but no one s going to buy. or we could save the company and start making good movies again with actor second act in people nothing against the people involved with this but there s a reason why you say no, and it s the writing it if the ideas and it s the woke stuff and the regressive stuff in there realizing americans don t buy this, so we are not going to do it. good for him. greg: about to tell you though. jamie, i want to see it now. so do i! greg: i want to know how bad it is. this is going to be movie that five or ten years from now will be at midnight showings, right? everybody will go they will know all the dumb woke comments. it will be like rocky horror. i swear to god i had a rocky horror picture, that s the first thing i thought of, now we ve got to see this. we must see it. how bad is this there movies are not that good. how bad is this movie that i think tyrus is absolutely right. i sometimes don t trust myself
were up to. writing it in an email, if the trump campaign advisor boris epshteyn. quote, we would just be it sending in fake electoral votes to pence so that someone in congress can make an objection when he starts counting votes and start arguing that the fake votes should be counted. in a follow-up to that message, alternative both is probably a better term than fake votes, adding a smiley face emojis. nice save there buddy, good one. now we know that the scheme is part of the department of justice investigation. washington post reports that that a grand jury issued subpoenas already to two arizona state lawmakers last month seeking communications related to any effort plan, or attempt to serve as an election for donald trump or mike pence. those subpoenas are just part of what s the pose described as a of a significant escalation and expansion of the justice department criminal probe. the same time, federal agents found out over multiple stasis or subpoenas, execute search
they thought that they might need some protection from the former president to absolve them, it clear them of their involvement to overturn the results of the election. you know, moe brooks nina afterwards and said he had to spin the email p molly michael, a senior aide at trump s white house saying to say he was writing it in advance of the potential prosecution, but in his actual letter, he used the words prosecution, and is a very clear difference there. so, jacqueline, thank you so much for joining me. i always enjoy your piece with, us whoever your sources are, you are so accurate and detailed. and i think it is important to create more transparency and what we are witnessing live unfold, when it comes to thank you for joining, us great live reporting. going we now is nbc news presidential historian ben bloch, also the host of five side history.
of dissecting it, trying to understand and analyze it. and then the actual people in the room, who got to ask their questions of the president today, claire. let me break some news here. if the people that are around the president are full well aware of his cognitive abilities. i can assure you, if joe biden had cognitive issues, they never would have let him call on newsmax or fox news. they would have said ahead of time, avoid these two people. by the way, they both asked stupid questions, and i was so glad that biden had an opportunity to say, hey, i m mainstream. you know, i like bernie sanders, but i m not bernie sanders. that s an important thing for him to say for the midterms, for the suburbs. and i actually think the only
had. he really tried to feel the pain that people are feeling when they re shopping for groceries or paying their rent. but there are there is a bigger picture. i was surprised that he didn t paint that broader picture in some of those exchanges. you mean in terms of the economic success of his first year? in terms of the jobs, how much money people have saved up, there are other statistics. and i think he was trying to really go where people are and people are scared about inflation, and they re mad about it. and they know they have to deal with this politically. but they have a lot of good economic news, and this gets to a structural problem, democrats have good facts on their side, they end up apologiing for what they haven t achieved yet. republicans rarely have either, and they pound their chest, make things up, and keep their base