minute. that is the notion that you cannot bring a case unless you have a actual case or controversy. okay. courts this could happen in the future, and we want your opinion of now. yes. gp, and if you are dealing with the abstract hypotheticals, you will be dealt with in a harmful way of trust in the way that the decisions are made. and people disagreed with the ruling, and it is the law of the land now, and people are looking at this, and there were misguided work on the part of the plr in this. where the facts were inaccurate in way that and that
plr. first off, there s then counteroffensive that we have been hearing about for weeks and weeks. we don t know if it started or when it might start. but the russians say it started already and it is not going well. they say the russians blew up the dam to prevent the russian count ir to the counterattack. the other reason is the russians say it s all about water. specifically, water for crimea because they have had issues since 2014 since they annexed this area because ukraine essentially shut off the taps. but since the full-scale invasion, russia managed to gain control of a critical canal, which is supplied crimea officials say that the water is going to go down, but they have enough for the time being. obviously, there s this nuclear power plant, which you mentioned, the international atomic energy agent i sit says that that reservoir supplies the cooling tanks, but they are good for the time being. there s no immediate safety threat at this point.