are you doing things differently? yes. and we take those criticisms to heart when they say we were too white and too male, think were right. howie: joining us, kat timpf and jessica tarlov. bernie prospered as the anti-hillary candidate. he never got tough scrutiny because pundits figured he wouldn t win. kat: last time he was the underdog. america loves an underdog. his campaign raising $6 million in 24 hours has people looking at him a little more seriously. the media won t be as nice as they were last time around when he was facing hillary clinton who everybody assumed would get
played so she wouldn t win. maybe you could talk about voting rights. if not, i m sure what you don t do, straacy abrams will have us keep hope alive. maybe you d mellow out a bit if you got geico to help you with your renters insurance. oh, geico helps with renters insurance? good to know. yeah, and they could save you a lot of money. wow, suddenly i feel so relieved. you guys are fired. get to know geico and see how much you could save on renters insurance. reach her health goals! i m in! but first. shelfie! the great-tasting nutrition of ensure. with up to 30 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals! ensure. for strength and energy.
the president may not have committed a crime by directing michael cohen to go held a lie, but that s not the only bar for presidential behavior. it matters that the president lied about it through the campaign and into his time in office. just because he didn t break the letter of the law doesn t mean it might be all right for a president to act this way. how much will that factor in. we talk about the president s base all of the time. there was a big chunk of people that voted that were taking a change on him and losing any of them could mean he wouldn t win by the same margin as last time. that s right and if it wasn t for 80,000 votes split up in three states. they didn t really like hillary clinton, they thought it was a
don t know how they make us productive. people say he won an election you guys said he wouldn t win. 100%. he s had i think pretty remarkable approval numbers considering the drumbeat of negative press attacks. you guys can say, look, it s going to be what he delivers. it s going to be what he delivers. i understand that, and i accept it to a certain degree because, you know, at the end of the day performance is productivity and we ll see what he can get done, and then people will vote on it. tone matters, though. but i think the public sees through it. let me give you an example. how many times in this book do they say people calling him an idiot, stupid. rex tillerson supposedly called him a moron. it s all kitchen table talk, but they re trying to make it seem like it s somehow real. quinnipiac poll recently asked americans what are the two best attributes of the president, and they said, 63%, he s a strong leader. that s pretty amazing considering again the attacks you
who s applauding? who s booing? this is all about what you see through your partisan lens. that s why the hearing was supposed to be different. they were supposed to establish facts that make their case in this showdown with strzok about the fact that his bias led to bad actions in this probe that make it a witch hunt. what did they find? really four things, okay? strzok screwed up by sending those texts. he exhibited bias against trump. that s true. it s really just one text, okay? this text came back to haunt him all day long. trump s never, ever going to become president, right, right? no, he won t. we ll stop it. he tried to explain it away by saying the american people would vote against him and he wouldn t win. it wasn t that compelling. and he admitted strzok the texting was wrong on several levels. one of them means that he arguably violated the fbi s code of conduct. strzok didn t have a great rebuttal for that either. now, because of that, they argue that strzok has no