the aisle were watching making feelings known loud and clear. here s republican congressman madison cawthorn in a video. kyle rittenhouse is not guilty, my friends. you have a right to defend yourselves. be armed, be dangerous and be moral. be armed and be dangerous. on the screen offers kyle rittenhouse an internship. the democratic side congressman eric swalwell said be pissed about the bias led to the rittenhouse verdict and blame the filibusters helping to write those laws. congressman thanks for joining us. emotions running high obviously after the verdict was read. but i have to say, a lot of legal experts are actually not surprised by this verdict. apparently the burden for the pro prosecution to prove there wasn t self-defense, that is a very difficult case to make for
will consider what they did wrong and how their bias led to mob action. maybe they will embrace this teachable moment. good thing the students at covington are standing up to teach them. sandra commences the right thing to do, these letters? should they sue all of them, some of them? sandra: you got to do something. with all of this, and the producers provided us with these lawyers who have dug deep into where he could possibly get with these lawsuits. it doesn t go far. within the legal framework today come with social media mobbing and it doesn t really fit. obviously that s going to have to be looked at but from a journalist standpoint, because he s taking on some of these media personalities, certainly there needs to be some held responsible. to run with something there for the entire video was even seen, and of course to put together their own edited version of this video. use google his name, this will live on forever for nick
was, find out if he was a good person or bad person. ultimately, i don t know what her motivation was, but i know that her bias led her to believe that that man was danger for some reason. i have said the most dangerous place for black people to live is in white people s estimation. i want to talk about serena williams. she was docked a game for her behavior on the court. that s one thing. now there is this cartoon in an australian newspaper, the harold sun which you think at. right. and you see this depiction, which certainly feels reminisce isn t of the way that black people have been depicted since slavery and before. but he says i guess the cartoonist says it wasn t racist. white dudes don t get to decide what racism is. you don t get to do that. you have blown it time and time again where you can t recognize it and it clearly is racist.
the justice department, the trump justice department is hiding those affidavits. on the grounds that the aths aths contain national security information. my goodness, here are the things we need to know about it. was the fact that hillary clinton and the dnc, the people who paid, was that pointed out to the judge? because if it wasn t you ve got a glaring omission. was it pointed out that steel during the course of this was fired by the fbi? has problems in his background exposed to the judge? was he presented as a fully reliable informant or were the questions you have to do that in an affidavit. sean: he never told the court in this affidavits that hillary paid for it. they purposely withheld that information. that would have been a nonstarter. sean: they never verified any of the information. here s the point, strzok created a false document. when we say, is there any evidence that his bias led to
information, mr. mayor. they lie to the american people. the justice department, the trump justice department is hiding those affidavits. on the grounds that the affidavits contained national security information. my goodness, here are the things we need to know about it. was the fact that hillary clinton and the dnc, the people who paid, was that pointed out to the judge? because if it wasn t you ve got a glaring omission. was it pointed out that steel during the course of this was fired by the fbi? has problems in his background exposed to the judge? was he presented as a fully reliable informant or were the questions you have to do that in an affidavit. sean: he never told the court in this affidavits that hillary paid for it. that would have been a nonstarter. sean: they never verified any of the information. here s the point, strzok created a false document. it when we say is there any evidence that his bias led to