boosting parties were essential work events, this hurts them. events, this hurts them. does she auree events, this hurts them. does she agree that events, this hurts them. does she agree that those events, this hurts them. does she agree that those members - events, this hurts them. does she agree that those members of - events, this hurts them. does she| agree that those members of this, who seem agree that those members of this, who seem to think that abstention is an appropriate response to this debate, an appropriate response to this debate, are wholly wrong, that this debate debate, are wholly wrong, that this debate goes to the heart of the very democratic debate goes to the heart of the very democratic principles on which our democracy democratic principles on which our democracy is founded, and that therefore. democracy is founded, and that therefore, for those people abstaining, they are guilty notjust of cowardice and duplicity but the very contempt firm which
memorial wall, hearts on the covid memorial well, just hearts on the covid memorial wall, just over the river. everyone represents a life lost to this awful disease. for every single heart, there is a human being loved, morant and missed. for each, there is a story around them of awful loss, of grief compounded by goodbyes and over smartphones, lives ended alone, people robbed of precious time together. and relatives unable to comfort iurge i urge members who continue to defend mrjohnson and attack the committee and their findings to think of these families, and what this means to them. they are our constituents. by defending mr johnson s consistent insistence that banks use birthdays and morale boosting parties were essential work events, this hurts them. does
assurances because it couldn t be said that assurances because it couldn t be said that the rules had been properly said that the rules had been properly followed, but itjust cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it so. cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it. so, whatever the circumstances, which he says brought these circumstances, which he says brought these gatherings about, where he says he these gatherings about, where he says he thought they were part of work says he thought they were part of work events, when he actually came to the work events, when he actually came to the commons and explained what had been to the commons and explained what had been going on, he knew that there had been going on, he knew that there was had been going on, he knew that there was a problem and he deliberately decided to conceal it. it deliberately decided to conceal it. it has deliberately decided to conceal it. it has to deliberat
says he these gatherings about, where he says he thought they were part of work says he thought they were part of work events, when he actually came to the work events, when he actually came to the commons, and explained what had been to the commons, and explained what had been going on, he knew that there had been going on, he knew that there was had been going on, he knew that there was a problem and deliberately decided there was a problem and deliberately decided to there was a problem and deliberately decided to conceal it. it has to be understood that this whole business is not understood that this whole business is not about what he did in downing street, is not about what he did in downing street, it is not about what he did in downing street, it is is not about what he did in downing street, it is whether he lied to the house street, it is whether he lied to the house of street, it is whether he lied to the house of commons. house of commons. attis dom
various statements about giving assurances that there had been no parties, he had been specifically told by his officials that he couldn t give such assurances because it could not be said the world had been properly followed, but you just cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it. so, whatever the circumstances, which he says brought these gatherings about, where he says he thought they were part of work events, when he actually came to the house of commons and explained what had been going on, he knew that there was a problem and he deliberately decided to conceal it. and it has to be understood that this whole business is not about what he did in downing street. it is whether he lied to the house of commons. whether he lied to the house of commem whether he lied to the house of commons. ~ . , , commons. well, that s interesting that ou commons. well, that s interesting that you make commons. well, that s interesting that you make that commons. well, that s interesting that you