they leave. borisjohnson has admitted his statements about the parties misled parliament but denied doing so intentionally. he described the report as rubbish and lies. let s go straight westminster and this report cannot be more damning, could it? it this report cannot be more damning, could it? , . , ., could it? it is a blunt damning re ort could it? it is a blunt damning report and could it? it is a blunt damning report and many could it? it is a blunt damning report and many expected - could it? it is a blunt damning report and many expected to l could it? it is a blunt damning i report and many expected to be could it? it is a blunt damning - report and many expected to be if we are not beating around the bush about this, it is essentially saying that he lied, notjust a parliament but also to the committee that were investigating whether he misled mps and that is because his conclusions that he deliberately misled mps on multiple occasions about what he knew of her
assurances because it couldn t be said that assurances because it couldn t be said that the rules had been properly said that the rules had been properly followed, but itjust cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it so. cheerfully decided to go ahead and do it. so, whatever the circumstances, which he says brought these circumstances, which he says brought these gatherings about, where he says he these gatherings about, where he says he thought they were part of work says he thought they were part of work events, when he actually came to the work events, when he actually came to the commons and explained what had been to the commons and explained what had been going on, he knew that there had been going on, he knew that there was had been going on, he knew that there was a problem and he deliberately decided to conceal it. it deliberately decided to conceal it. it has deliberately decided to conceal it. it has to deliberat
sense. borisjohnson gave evidence to the committee in march and was asked to explain why he tore parliament that guidance was followed when he had been a defence like this one in downing street where there was clearly little social distancing. the committee said his explanations were so disingenuous. borisjohnson is not only a lawbreaker but a liar, he is not fit for public lawbreaker but a liar, he is not fit for public office and continues to act like for public office and continues to act like a for public office and continues to act like a pound shop tromp in the way that act like a pound shop tromp in the way that he act like a pound shop tromp in the way that he tries to discredit anybody way that he tries to discredit anybody who criticises him when actually anybody who criticises him when actually it anybody who criticises him when actually it decent public service would ve actually it decent public service would ve done the honourable thing and at would ve d