Tradition. We want to take a look at the stage right now as were waiting for mayor ed lee to begin speaking. Yes, it is staged and the stage is certainly set, kris, as it is not just cities like San Francisco as we await, remarks from mayor ed lee, but major cosmopolitan cities all over the country dealing with this question. Lets listen in right now. San francisco, good morning. Good morning. And look at this incredible space were in. Hand for everyone. [ applause ] who brought this great space back to life. First off, i really want to thank all of the elected officials. Department heads. We will come in and bring you mayor ed lees comments as they happen. Pete suratos is there monitoring what the state of the city address is going to be. Some of it we anticipate smrks we dont know. Yesterday mayor ed lee came out and San Francisco would not be backing down from threats from the federal government, and specifically an executive order from donald trump citing that federal funding would
That car fire, a brush and that brush turned into a brushfire around red wood estates. That caused some evacuations we are told now though that those people are being allowed back to their homes partly because of quick water drops. Some of the water being picked up by helicopters in nearby lexington reservoir and then dropped over the hills and over the brush in red wood estates. As can you see from our chopper shot, most of the fire is gone. It is now smoke they are dealing with. Again fire is downgraded and people let back in and the worst we can tell you is if youre southbound anywhere south of los gatos it is a while and we still have no estimated time that freeway will be going south towards red wood estates. Scott budman, nbc bay area news. We see this develop and wined down for the last couple of hours. We will show you a live traffic map now again one lane of northbound 17 reopened but all southbound lanes as scott was mentioning closed. Can you see all the maps in los gatos. I
Required to legalize the changed use or occupancy and this is been confirmed by the Planning Department and the building inspection law doesnt provide for some sort of different process because the unit is quote unquote illegal a Building Permit is required to change the use which is exactly what the permit holler holder is doing when he plans to remove the unit from housing use and evict my client navigate hes tried to evict my client a permit holder has filed last month filed an unlawful detainer a lawsuit to evict my client weve demurred because the planning permit was not the proper permit to remove from the housing use youve heard prosecute your experts the permit hordes response to the demur he stated 31st his intent in filing the plumbing permit to remove the unit to change its use to change its occupancy navigate he also stated in his restraining order response to our demur a no permit was necessary well, the; is that right testimony and the Building Code says otherwise the cou
Client a permit holder has filed last month filed an unlawful detainer a lawsuit to evict my client weve demurred because the planning permit was not the proper permit to remove from the housing use youve heard prosecute your experts the permit hordes response to the demur he stated 31st his intent in filing the plumbing permit to remove the unit to change its use to change its occupancy navigate he also stated in his restraining order response to our demur a no permit was necessary well, the; is that right testimony and the Building Code says otherwise the court is looking for guidance we have a ruling from the court the judge stated the proceeding and ruled if the permit is denied or rejected hell sustain the demur meaning the unlawful detainer can be dismissed the plumbing permit at issue cant be used to change the unit use or occupancy the law requires a Building Permit we ask you revoke the plumbing permit because it cant be used to remove the united from housing use and also to r
What the permit holler holder is doing when he plans to remove the unit from housing use and evict my client navigate hes tried to evict my client a permit holder has filed last month filed an unlawful detainer a lawsuit to evict my client weve demurred because the planning permit was not the proper permit to remove from the housing use youve heard prosecute your experts the permit hordes response to the demur he stated 31st his intent in filing the plumbing permit to remove the unit to change its use to change its occupancy navigate he also stated in his restraining order response to our demur a no permit was necessary well, the; is that right testimony and the Building Code says otherwise the court is looking for guidance we have a ruling from the court the judge stated the proceeding and ruled if the permit is denied or rejected hell sustain the demur meaning the unlawful detainer can be dismissed the plumbing permit at issue cant be used to change the unit use or occupancy the law