Boulder creek golf course. The fires have torched close to 60,000 acres. Tonight, Scotts Valley residents and the uc santa cruz are the latest to be evacuated. We are live with the details tonight. Fire is zero percent contained and that marks another night of evacuations in Santa Cruz County. Those in Scotts Valley and uc santa cruz are the latest to receive the official notice to leave and it only came a few hours ago. Its this scene across the ccu august lightning complex fires. Forcing continued mandatory evacuations. A look at Boulder Creek in Santa Cruz County thursday evening. Homes are actively burning. Cars charred, since is igniting the devastation and ongoing danger has led to the evacuation of close to 50,000 people. You are hearing about some of the other surrounding fires. We are standing guard, the best way we know how. For Scotts Valley resident, the best way to stand guard now means getting out of town. The evacuation orders for the city, leave now. I have never seen a
If you are there, the sheriff said, leave now. The evacuation orders have expanded in Santa Cruz County. Take a look at the powerful new video. It shows firefighters on the front lines, battling flames trying to save homes near the Boulder Creek golf course. The fires have torched close to 60,000 acres. Tonight, Scotts Valley residents and the uc santa cruz are the latest to be evacuated. We are live with the details tonight. Amanda . Reporter the fire is zero percent contained and that marks another night of evacuations in Santa Cruz County. Those in Scotts Valley and uc santa cruz are the latest to receive the official notice to leave and it only came a few hours ago. Its this scene across the ccu august lightning complex fires. Forcing continued mandatory evacuations. A look at Boulder Creek in Santa Cruz County thursday evening. Homes are actively burning. Cars charred, since is igniting the devastation and ongoing danger has led to the evacuation of close to 50,000 people. You are
Attorney serving the neighborhood ive never seen a third bathroom in any house in the entire neighborhood. There are no threebathroom houses in the bayview district. And certainly it doesnt make sense to have a threebathroom and twobedroom unit for this single mother and her young daughter. It doesnt make sense. Which leaves the only logical conclusion in my mind that the Property Owner is intending to make this two short term rentals. The upstairs bedroom has been siphoned into units. The planning website reflects. The Property Owner told me this isnt planned but i have a hard time seeing any other possible reality that can occur here. No one believes in the maintaining the Affordable Housing more than i do. But in this case this isnt the hypothetical. Somebody is actually living there with her daughter. And this is potentially lowering her ability to live there in the same way that shes lived there for the past many years. Finally im sorry. I lost my train of thought. The unit oh the
About back here about 7 45, please. Thank you we are ready. Okay. Please be seated. Welcome back to the november 6, 2019 meeting of the San Francisco board of appealing. We are now on item number 7. This is appeal number 19085. Our mission no eviction versus the Planning Commission subject property is 344 shortstop 14th street, appealing the issuance to mm stevenson llc of planning code section 329 large project authorization. Adopting findings relating to a large project authorization for the project proposing new construction of a sevenstory, 78 feet at all mixed use residential building measuring 84,630 square feet with 5,890 square feet of ground floor retail use and 606 dwelling units consisting of four studio units, 25 twobedroom, two bathroom units which would utilize the code section 6591565918 and invoke waivers from the Development Standards for rear yard pursuant to section 134 usable open space 135 and height, planning code 268. Record number 2014. 0948. I need to make a di
Unit. It was created into a twobedroom unit. Shes lived in a twobedroom unit the entire time shes lived there. And the coincidences im talking about ive probably been in more homes in the Bayview District than pretty much any other person in San Francisco as a housing attorney serving the neighborhood ive never seen a third bathroom in any house in the entire neighborhood. There are no threebathroom houses in the Bayview District. And certainly it doesnt make sense to have a threebathroom and twobedroom unit for this single mother and her young daughter. It doesnt make sense. Which leaves the only logical conclusion in my mind that the Property Owner is intending to make this two short term rentals. The upstairs bedroom has been siphoned into units. The planning website reflects. The Property Owner told me this isnt planned but i have a hard time seeing any other possible reality that can occur here. No one believes in the maintaining the Affordable Housing more than i do. But in this