Here, adams here, leslie katz here. Approval for items minutes for 2012 meeting can i have a motion to approve the minutes. Second all in favor aye. Item two Public Comment and executive session, is there any Public Comment . Come on up. Good afternoon commissioners im victor della cruz im here on behalf of the Development Company to express some dearns about the sea wall lot three will he notions that you are about in engage in. Our client is very concerned that the port of San Francisco is continuing to negotiate with the giant not with andlinging the departure of the quite iaye that constitutes the bulk of the propyling submitted by w w llc. , almost all of the development compatibility in the s w l associate the rl l c teams proposal seams to be out of the picture snow. The report is that the existing proposal is a little shell that reresembles nothing to the only proposals that is not only tremendously unfair to the other bidders who participants in this process but its not compet
Drop, i submit to you that one is too many. These numbers represent the patients who are transported to the hospital, not the victims who died at the scene or do not come in for care. Many people are killed from homicides, but suicide taking ones life with weapons is much more common in the United States. It is a silent killer since more than twice as many people die of suicide than homicide historically in the United States. There is an hep dim i can of Violent Crime committed with guns and is a Serious Public Health problem that we must confront head on. It is incidents like this past week bring these terrible crimes out in the public, but the reality is people are killed every day in this country with weapons that permanently change the lives of the families that they are with. In conclusion, i would like to thank the mayor for inviting me out to stand with supervisor cohen, police chief sur, to support sensible gun control. The Trauma Center stands ready to care for victims. Any in
Okay. Meeting called to order. Roll call commissioner kimberly brandon. Here, adams here, leslie katz here. Approval for items minutes for 2012 meeting can i have a motion to approve the minutes. Second all in favor aye. Item two Public Comment and executive session, is there any Public Comment . Come on up. Good afternoon commissioners im victor della cruz im here on behalf of the Development Company to express some dearns about the sea wall lot three will he notions that you are about in engage in. Our client is very concerned that the port of San Francisco is continuing to negotiate with the giant not with andlinging the departure of the quite iaye that constitutes the bulk of the propyling submitted by w w llc. , almost all of the development compatibility in the s w l associate the rl l c teams proposal seams to be out of the picture snow. The report is that the existing proposal is a little shell that reresembles nothing to the only proposals that is not only tremendously unfair
Work that is proposed currently and additionally, and a letter from mr. Morton was received yesterday after the publication of the report further out lying the concerns regarding the proposed work and a copy is available for the public and also been forwarded to the commission. And specifically the letter raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional h
Montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource. As such the department has found that the proposed work meets the standards and the requirement of article ten and therefore, it is exempt from the secua. The project sponsor is here to scribe the project for me and the details of the skop of work. That includes the administration and if the staff is available for any questions that you have. Thank you. We