jackie ibañez. tensions of the israel hamas war outgrowing us tens of thousands of people across the globe take to the streets demanding cease-fire. cease-fire now! palestinian marches, rallies happening now in major cities including london, paris, new york and washington d.c. protesters demanded less and less countries stop sending military aid to israel. they are pretty much bombing everything. this is not a war, or is military against military but this is against humanity. there round of protests, as u.s. secretary of state antony blinken met with middle eastern leaders, leaders from egypt and jordan are struggling condemning israel s defensive demanding immediate cease-fire. the u.s. opposes cease-fire, he pushes for israel to allow positive in its assault on gaza. the united states believes all will be facilitated by humanitarian causes. we believe posits can be a critical mechanism protecting civilians and giving aid and foreign nationals out while still enabling
people were reportedly killed in an israeli bombing at a refugee camp in central gaza. the camp is located in the evacuate zone where israel s military is urging palestinian civilians to seek refuge. israel s military says it s looking into the incident. it also comes as the us works to prevent the war from escalating. countries across the middle east and beyond have played an essential role in preventing its spread. we all agreed on the importance of using our respective influence and capabilities to deter any state or non-state actor from opening another front in this conflict or taking other destabilizing actions. all of us have a direct interest in this. saturday marks one month since the deadly attacks by hamas on israel sparked the conflict. i m jackie ibanez. now back to fox news saturday night. i m kat timpf and this is fox news saturday news.com. i m kat timpf and this is fox news saturday night. as you might know, new york city marathon. [cheering] if you are
Work that is proposed currently and additionally, and a letter from mr. Morton was received yesterday after the publication of the report further out lying the concerns regarding the proposed work and a copy is available for the public and also been forwarded to the commission. And specifically the letter raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional h
Extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource. As such the department has found that the proposed work meets the standards and the requirement of article ten and therefore, it is exempt from the
Work that is proposed currently and additionally, and a letter from mr. Morton was received yesterday after the publication of the report further out lying the concerns regarding the proposed work and a copy is available for the public and also been forwarded to the commission. And specifically the letter raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional h