let s take a look at the week s top stories. as you know, i can t talk about particulars of this or any other ongoing criminal manner. as i said when i appointed mr. smith i did so because it underscored the justice department s commitment to an oath independents and accountability. mr. smith is a veteran career prosecutor. he has assembled a group i ve experienced and talented prosecutors. and agents, whose share his commitment to integrity and the rule of law. any questions about this matter will have to be answered by their filings in the court. attorney general, merrick garland, with some breathe where it s for the first time since donald trump s federal indictment. is it just may or willie are we starting to see again. not a complete breaking of ice. but a more thawing of ice? this is horrible. it s bad, but i m gonna pardon him. day three, too early to talk about pardons. because you know the news came out. i m sure mike pence saw the new jersey nightmare. the p
we found this research from harvard which shows that however you look at power, women don t really want to. we find the cost of getting it to high, and that actually power itself is this zero sum game nature power. more free means less for me. the hierarchical dominance nature of power, women just don t find it appealing. so we kind of turned the proposition on, instant medium we lead well, we re educated, we have all the right qualifications. what we need to do is change the way the power works in organizations. and that would be better for everybody. that gets that one of your points claire, which is that men and women defied power. i need to fight for that. when just look at it differently, don t they? that s part of what we found to joe s point to. we would ve thought there be more women at the top, but women opt out, what we found is part of the clash, the supply and demand program is women use it differently. we re almost other, you start
it shows the president approval has dropped from 53% in february to 50% in march. that s a million percent. and it shows that a times article note with uh mace meant, even as the debate raised over birth control insurance coverage. how can this be? they have to cover the full cost of birth control for employees or should the employers opt out for moral or religious moral, or religious reasons? women opt out 36-44. and when the question was what about for religiously affiliated employers, the numbers in favor of an opt out were larger with 53 to 38% favorable among women. how did the times cover these results? the poll found women were split as to whether health insurance plans should cover the cost of birth control and whether employ years could opt out. how is 58-33 a split?